|
|
"My People Are Destroyed For Lack Of Knowledge
Because You Have Rejected Knowledge, I Reject
You..."
(Hosea 4:6)
Spiritual
Knowledge Is The Fruit Of The Tree Of Life
Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they
may have the right to the tree of life,
and may enter through the gates into the city. But
outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral
and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and
practices a lie.
Rev 22:14-15
|
|
The Church As A Secret
System:
In the approximate year of 178 of our Common Era, Celsus,
the Epicurean Philosopher and opponent of Christianity, published a rather
embarrassing work in opposition to Christianity known as The True Word or
Discourse, which portrayed the Church as a
"secret system" which
taught the elect the doctrine of the soul that evolves to perfection over the
course of many lifetimes, while teaching the unenlightened entry-level
Christians the doctrine of Heaven and Hell. It is said that this work was so
widely published and used by the Pagan world as an attack on the Church. Seventy
years after its publication The True Word was still so widely circulated, that
the Church Father Origen was commissioned by St. Ambrosius to refute this attack
by Celsus. Who was Origen that he was asked to present the official position of
the Church? Origen is called
“…the most prominent of all the church fathers”
(Encyclopedia. Britannica), and was considered by Jerome to be
“the greatest teacher of the Church after the Apostles.”
St. Gregory of Nyssa called him
“the prince of Christian learning in the Third Century.”
In his Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, by Dr. F. H.
Scrivener, one of the ablest of modern-day biblical scholars and critics writes
of Origen:
“Origen is the most celebrated biblical critic of
antiquity. His is the highest name among the critics and expositors of the early
Church. He is perpetually engaged in the discussion of various readings of the
New Testament, and employs language, in describing the then existing state of
the text, which would be deemed strong if applied even to its present condition,
after the changes which sixteen more centuries must needs have produced… Seldom
have such warmth of fancy and so bold a grasp of mind been united with the
lifelong, patient industry which procured for this famous man the honorable
appellation of Adamantius.”
Based upon the above, the published reply
of Origen known as Contra-Celsum, to the allegation of the Church being a
"secret system"
that teaches those who have achieved degrees of spiritual maturity different
than the masses of entry-level believers, must be understood as the official
position of the Church prior to the takeover of the religion by the Emperor
Constantine in the fourth century. Quoting the Wikipedia with respect to the support of the
confirmation of teachings in Origen's Contra-Celsum (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra_Celsum
:
"Eusebius admired Contra Celsum so much that in his Contra
Hieroclem, he declared that Contra Celsum provided an adequate rebuttal to all
criticisms the church would ever face".
The position of the Church was that only
the believer who sincerely embraced the teachings of Jesus -- becoming the
"good ground" in the
parable of the Sower and the Seed (see
http://SowerAndTheSeed.Ebionite.com
), could fulfill the purpose and
objective of the Gospel teachings. Preparedness to understand man's higher
Soul-Reality, is why Jesus spoke only in parables to the masses of people who
lacked the necessary spiritual maturity to comprehend the core Gospel teachings
-- i.e.,
"And with many such parables He spoke the word to them as
they were able to hear it. But without a parable He did not speak to them. And
when they were alone, He explained all things to His disciples"
(Mark 4:33-34). Only those who had achieved degrees of
spiritual maturity, could the mysteries of the Kingdom be revealed -- i.e.,
Jesus explained:
“Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom
of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables:
That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not
understand” (Mark 4:11-12). Which is why St.
Jerome wrote:
“The doctrine of transmigration (reincarnation) has been
secretly taught from ancient times to small numbers of people, as a traditional
truth which was not to be divulged.” Why in
the pre-Nicene Church were the more spiritually mature taught differently than
those who failed to advance? Origen responded to the allegation of Celsus by
explaining that:
“For there are in the divinity of the Word some helps
towards the cure of those who are sick”,
meaning the sinners.
And this is true, as Origen explained,
that
the doctrine of the (physical)
resurrection of the body, says Origen,
is misunderstood by the spiritually
unaware, and writes that it was
“preached in the Churches… for the
simpleminded and for the ears of the
common crowd who are led on to live
better lives by their belief”.
Why would
Origen in his official response by the
pre-Nicene Church, portray one group of
faith-based Christians as being
"...simpleminded",
and incapable of comprehending the
spiritual meaning of the Gospel
teachings? To answer this
question, it is important to understand
why Jesus is portrayed as not being able
to speak plainly to the people when he
was teaching them about the Kingdom when
he explained to his disciples:
“Unto you it is
given to know the mystery of the kingdom
of God: but unto them that are without,
all these things are done in parables:
That seeing they may see, and not
perceive; and hearing they may hear, and
not understand”
(Mark 4:11-12). Why could Jesus
convey the mysteries of the kingdom to
his disciples, but not to the multitudes
who came to hear him teach? When
the reason is rightly understood, the
answer is the same as to way Paul could
not speak plainly to the baptized
Christians who are portrayed as having
received the "testimony
about Christ [which] was confirmed in"
the people (1 Cor 1:4-) -- and yet Paul
warned them:
"And I, brethren,
could not speak to you as to spiritual
people but as to carnal, as to babes in
Christ. I fed you with milk and
not with solid food; for until now you
were not able to receive it, and even
now you are still not able; for you are
still carnal"
(1 Cor 3:1-3). Why was Paul unable
to convey the spiritual concepts
and meaning of the Gospel to the
baptized and committed Christians who
had received the
testimony
of Christ [which was] confirmed in them"?
He explained that as organic humans,
they could not receive and comprehend
the spiritual meaning of the Gospels and
the higher Spiritual Kingdom -- i.e.,
“But the natural
man does not receive the things of the
Spirit of God, for they are foolishness
to him; nor can he know them, because
they are spiritually discerned”
(1 Cor 2:14).
Why would the mind of organic man reject
the higher spiritual wisdom as
"foolishness"?
To
answer these questions, it is important
to understand the meaning of the
word that Paul used which is translated
the
"natural"
mind. What is the Natural Mind of
mankind that is incapable of
comprehending higher spiritual concepts?
The Greek meaning portrays the natural
organic mind of man as being at an
animal level of consciousness -- ruled
over by his lower animal nature -- as
demonstrated where the Jamieson-Fausset-Brown
Bible Commentary writes with respect to
the meaning of the word
"natural"
in the original Greek language:
"natural
man—literally, 'a man of animal soul'."
Which means that even though the people
were baptized Christians who the
"...testimony
about Christ was confirmed in",
Paul warned that these faith-based
Christians were still mentally
functioning in accord with their lower
animal consciousness and mindset.
And this fact of life is further
explained in the Treasury Of Scriptural
Knowledge, where it is revealed that
this profound statement at 1 Cor 2:14
reads (quoting Paul):
"'But
the natural man receives not the things
of the Spirit of God: for they are
foolishness to him: neither can he know
them, because they are spiritually
discerned.'
Then
provides the interpretative-meaning of
Paul's words with respect to the reality
of what is portrayed by Paul as the
natural man:.
[Psuchikos,] the animal man, one who
lives in a natural state, and under the
influence of his animal passions; for [psuche]
means the inferior and sensual part of
man, in opposition to the [nous]
understanding, or [pneuma,] the spirit".
And this is not only true -- but is is a
fact of life that all spiritually
developed and enlightened souls must
deal with when interacting with organic
man. Which is exactly why
Paul profoundly stated to the very
people who he had personally taught the
Gospel message:
"And I, brethren,
...fed you with milk and not with solid
food"
Stating to the body of confirmed and
baptized believers who he stated had
received all truth and knowledge
pertaining to the elementary
"traditions"
of Christ:
“But the natural
man does not receive the things of the
Spirit of God, for they are
foolishness
to him; nor can he know them, because
they are
spiritually
discerned”
(1 Cor 2:14).
It was this fact of life that
Origen was attempting to explain as to
why the pre-Nicene Church permits the
faith-based Christians to believe in the
spurious doctrine of heaven, hell and
judgment day -- thereby prompting
Epicurean Philosopher Celsus to accuse
the Church of being a "secret system" --
teaching the inner core of Christians a
totally different doctrine than the vast
multitude of faith-based believers.
To which Origen explained:
“For there are in the divinity of the Word some helps
towards the cure of those who are sick”.
And this is true, as Origen explained,
that
the doctrine of the (physical)
resurrection of the body, says Origen,
is misunderstood by the spiritually
unaware, and writes that it was
“preached in the Churches… for the
simpleminded and for the ears of the
common crowd who are led on to live
better lives by their belief”. Wherein,
Origen then clarifies his statement and writes that these
sinners are by no means invited to
“…participation in mysteries, then, and to fellowship in the wisdom hidden in a
mystery, which God ordained before the world to the glory of His saints”.
As demonstrated in the foregoing, it
wasn't that the multitudes were misled
-- but rather, the fact was that the
organic mind of man is incapable of
comprehending the higher reality of the
Soul. Which means that they were
encouraged to believe
"entry level"
doctrines that prepared them to mentally
and spiritually advance to the level
where they could receive the Sacred
Knowledge that Jesus taught.
When the promise of eternal life was
made, it was not made to the complacent
believer who failed to spiritually
advance. In his famed work De Principiis, Origin
explains who can be a recipient of the Mysteries of the Kingdom and the Gospel
of God:
“Whoever has clean hands, and therefore lifts up holy
hands to God… let him come to us… Whoever is pure, not only from all defilement,
but from what are regarded as lesser transgressions, let him be boldly initiated
into the mysteries of Jesus, which properly are made known only to the holy and
the pure… To those who have been purified in heart, he whose soul has for a long
time, been conscious of no evil, especially since he yielded himself to the
healing of the Word, let such a one hear the doctrines which were spoken in
private by Jesus to his genuine disciples”.
Paul made reference to the inability of entry-level Christians who he, himself,
had taught, to understand the spiritual meaning of the Gospel teachings when he
said:
"...I fed you with milk and not with solid food; for until now you were not able
to receive it, and even now you are still not able; for you are still carnal".
It is therefore imperative that modern
believers understand Paul's words when he stated to those who he had personally
taught:
“But the natural man does not receive the things of the
Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because
they are spiritually discerned”
(1 Cor 2:14). Thus,
it is not a
"secret system"
when it
is recognized that teachings such as the pre-existent Soul that evolves to
perfection over the course of many lives, cannot be understood by the Christians
who fail to advance to an intellectual level where they are able to comprehend
man's higher Soul-Reality.
Within the official reply to Celsus by
the Church is this teaching on the pre-existent Soul that evolves to Wholeness
and Perfection over the course of many lives:
"Is it not rational that souls should be introduced into
bodies, in accordance with their merits and previous deeds, and that those who
have used their bodies in doing the utmost possible good should have the right
to bodies endowed with qualities superior to the bodies of others?... The soul,
which is immaterial and invisible in its nature, exists in no material place
without having a body suited to the nature of that place; accordingly, it at one
time puts off one body, which was necessary before, but which is no longer
adequate in its changed state, and it exchanges it for a second".
And in his famed work De Principiis the Church Father
Origen explains:
"The soul has neither beginning nor end... Every soul... comes into this world
strengthened by the victories or weakened by the defeats of its previous life.
Its place in this world as a vessel appointed to honor or dishonor is determined
by its previous merits or demerits. Its work in this world determines its place
in the world which is to follow this..."
Where the vast
majority of people heard the words
"For
God so loved the world that He gave His
one and only Son, that everyone who
believes in Him shall not perish but
have eternal life".
Thus, while they claimed to believe,
they ignored the defining factor of
belief as stated in the words:
"The Light has
come into the world, but men loved the
darkness rather than the Light because
their deeds were evil. Everyone who does
evil hates the Light, and does not come
into the Light for fear that his deeds
will be exposed. But whoever practices
the truth comes into the Light, so that
it may be seen clearly that what he has
done has been accomplished in God"
(John 3:16-21)
In order to inherit the Promise, and
come into the Light, the person must
"...practices
the truth"
by becoming the
"good ground" in the
parable of the Sower and the Seed (see
The Sower
And The Seed
http://SowerAndTheSeed.Ebionite.com
).
Who, then, is a believer?
"Every tree that
does not bear good fruit is cut down and
thrown into the fire. So then, by their
fruit you will recognize them. Not
everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’
will enter the kingdom of heaven, but
only he who does the will of My Father
in heaven. Many will say to Me on that
day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in
Your name, and in Your name drive out
demons and perform many miracles?’ Then
I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew
you; depart from Me, you workers of
lawlessness!"
(Matt 7:19-23). If salvation is by
faith, then what is the good fruit that
is required? Moreover, what is meant
when a faith-based believers who have
"...prophesy in
[the Lord's] name, and in [the Lord's]
name drives out demons and performs many
miracle"
is portrayed as being
"lawless"?
To his disciples who were
portrayed as being In The House with the Lord, Jesus said:
“Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto
them that are without, all these things are done in parables: That seeing they
may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand”
(Mark 4:11-12). In the Gospels we encounter two groups of people who exist at
greatly differing levels of consciousness and understanding -- i.e., those who
are portrayed as being "without", and the
few who are said to be "In The House".
With respect to the reality of those who are portrayed in the Gospels as being
"without", in contradistinction to those
who are said to be In The House, the quotation of the early Church Father Origen
represents an excellent portrayal of the reality of mind and being that is
presented in these words of Jesus -- wherein, Origen writes in reply to the
allegations of philosopher Celsus that the Church is a secret system:
“I have not yet spoken of the observances of all that
is written in the gospel, each one of which contains much doctrine difficult to
be understood, not merely by the multitude, but even by certain of the more
intelligent, including a very profound explanation of the parables, which Jesus
delivered to 'those without' while reserving the exhibition of their full
meaning for those who have passed beyond the stage of exoteric teachings, and
who came to him privately in the house. And when he comes to understand it, he
will admire the reason why some are said to be without, and others in the house”.
In
our modern day it can be said that this reply by the Church Father Origen is
even more important than when it was written.
Why?
Because the
majority of Christians today have been so disenfranchised from the spiritual essence
and objectives of
the teachings of TheWay (The Way) that Jesus taught, that it is as if they are practicing
a different religion.
Because
they view life from a quasi-Darwinist perception -- and their minds have been
trained by the secular philosophers of our day to limit their thinking to a
counterfeit three-dimensional perception of Creation -- they remain helplessly
lost, repeating scriptural verses that has little meaning to their present
secularized state of mind.
In
our endeavor to enlighten ourselves with regard to a much clearer picture of the
original Gospel message as it was envisioned by the early Gentile church at that
time prior to its Paganization under the government of Rome -- and in our effort
to begin the process of comprehending our present day theological limitations
which was a result of the Reformation -- it would be very helpful for us to
begin by examining the church prior to the time when its doctrine came under the
direct control of a series of Roman Emperors in the fourth century.
From this perspective, what we have in both The True Word by Celsus, and the
official reply of the church in the form of Origen's work known as
Origen
Contra Celsum -- or, Origen Against Celsus -- is a window to the past that
provides a rather unique glimpse into
the beliefs and doctrines of the first and second century Gentile Christian
Church.
Unique, in that the
text not only contains the allegations of the second century Pagan world against
the Church, but also the official reply of the Church to these allegations.
The document known as
The True Word no longer exists, but its text
is largely preserved in the eight (8) books that Origen wrote in the endeavor to
refute the charges against the Church by the Pagan Philosopher Celsus.
In
examination of this document, the modern Christian must initially ask:
Who today
would accuse the Christian Church of being a “secret system”?
No one -- because the Church today has lost its spiritual essence -- and
is a mere shadow of its former self over the first three centuries of its
existence.
Therefore, it is
important for us to recognize that such an allegation would be unheard of in our
present time.
|
The Institutionalized Church
|
|
Orthodox Christians Sold
Their Soul To The Devil
|
|
Why Are Sinners Even
Tolerated In A Spiritual Church?
|
|
Spiritual Vs
Institutionalized Church
|
|
Widows And Orphans
|
|
Man As A Soul-Embryo
|
|
The Pre-Existent Soul
That Evolves To Perfection Over The Course Of May
Lifetimes
|
|
The Church
As A Secret System
|
|
The Exoteric
Doctrines Designed For the Entry-Level Believers
|
|
PART II: Physical vs
Spiritual
|
|
The Minor
Mysteries
|
|
Scriptures
Written In The Acceptable Customs Of The People
|
|
The
Threefold Pattern Of The Scriptures
|
|
Shepherd Of Hermas
|
|
People Only See
Their Own Doctrines Of Belief In The Scriptures
|
|
Part III: The Inconceivable
Reality Of The Scriptures
|
|
The
Conformation Of Science
|
|
Origen On Allegory
|
|
Untruths Written
Into The Scriptures
|
|
Intentional Conflicts
Written Into Text
|
|
The Flawed Genealogies
|
|
Origen On Scriptural
Objectives
|
|
The Allegorical Genesis
|
|
The Key Of Knowledge
|
|
The Righteous Need Not A
Physician
|
|
Paul On The Allegory Of
Abraham
|
|
The Shepherd Of Hermas
|
The
Institutionalized Church: The
modern Church views its mission as a sort of religious outreach to save sinners
-- and yet, quite contrary to the modern agenda, Celsus viewed sinners as being
detrimental to a religion such as Christianity. In fact, he questioned why they were even tolerated.
Before we inquire how such a statement could even be made, let us
remember that the Apostle Paul said the exact same thing when he wrote:
“Do
not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness
have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?” (2 Cor
6:14 NIV). Further, the whole dogmatic foundation of the modern
Church that dispenses salvation on the basis of merely saying a prayer and
accepting Jesus as one's personal lord and saviour -- is openly condemned and
rejected in the New Testament (see
The Ten Minute Test).
This
view -- in and of itself -- is crucial to both demonstrate and understand the
major fundamental differences between a secular institutionalized church --
which was born during the Nicene (Nicene Council in the year 325) and post
Nicene period (after the year 325) -- and the anti or pre-Nicene Church (prior
to the year 325 AD), during the first three centuries of our Common Era.
It is important to understand that from the perception of the pre-Nicene
Church, the very pagan version of Christianity that came into existence in the
fourth century -- the manmade dogma of which is the foundation of the Church
today -- not only would have been condemned as heresy by the early pre-Nicene
Church -- but is openly condemned as apostates to the New Covenant and the
Kingdom in the Bible itself (see
The Ten Minute Test).
If
we are to begin the process of the spiritual restoration of the essence of the
teachings of TheWay, it is important for us to understand that the doctrine of
the Nicene and post-Nicene Church was largely under the control of the Emperors
and the Roman Government.
This
meant that in the fourth century, Christianity had become the religion of the masses -- masses of what
-- masses of Pagan and heathen converts from every quarter of the Roman Empire.
This also meant that freedom to believe in accordance with either ones
conscience, or even ones spiritual knowledge, was terminated once the church was
brought under government control.
In
fact, it could be stated that freedom of belief no longer existed once the
church became institutionalized.
The
church -- which had become secular in nature -- formulated official dogma, and
like any other government edict or law, everyone was required to adhere to this
doctrine.
Anyone who
disagreed with the official position of the Church was either banished from the
empire, or put to death.
At
the direction of the Emperor Constantine, the Council of Nice declared Jesus to
be God, and affirmed what is today known as the doctrine of the Trinity -- which
basically states that God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, are
all one and the same being.
Yet, the scriptures openly stated that Jesus was a man who fulfilled the Law
within himself, and became the (adopted) Son of God and Messiah at his baptism
in the Jordan (see
The Ten
Words). And that the modern Church continues to reject the very
Words of God spoken to mankind, is a reality that has not only spiritually
disenfranchised the modern Church -- but has inhibited them from receiving the
Divine Knowledge/Manna of the Kingdom -- and like the Jews, has banished them
into a Spiritual Diaspora of profound ignorance.
Church Sold It's
Soul To The Devil: It can
be said that when you sell your soul to the Devil, then you dwell under
diabolical control. From a spiritual perspective, the Roman
Emperor Constantine was in every way the minister and servant of the
Devil -- and when the segement of the Church which called themselves
Orthodox entered a covenant with Constantine, then the Church itself
became a possession of the Left Hand -- and that the Church would
worship Satan instead of God, was predicted by Paul (see
The Church Of The
Anti-Christ).
What
is important to understand is that prior to the Council of Nice there existed a
whole host of differing and often conflicting opinions with regard to the nature
of Jesus.
Was Jesus God?
Was Jesus a man who matured to his true potential as the Offspring of
God, and in essence took his place next to God his Father?
What we fail to realize today is the fact that, in a religion with a true
spiritual foundation, these differences of opinion -- opinions that are not
permitted under government rule -- are an absolutely necessary condition for the
establishment of a healthy Church In fact, it is the flexibility in doctrine
that is necessary for the very
structural fabric that is vital to support the proper functioning and framework
of an enlightened Church.
In
contradistinction, such flexibility in doctrine is absolutely detrimental to a
secular institutionalized church -- where the hierarchy of priests must be
maintained as the source and authority of church teachings and doctrine.
The Institutionalized Dogmatic Church breeds ignorance, and this can be readily
demonstrated with the profound ignorance of the modern sect of Jehovah's
Witnesses -- who must strictly adhere to the dogma of their Bible Aide that is
published by the Watchtower in Brooklyn, New York. Those who
can observe the plight of the Jehovah's Witnesses portray their Bible Aide that
has all the approved answers that a Witness is permitted to give, the sects
"Paper Pope".
We
can observe this same problem at work today in Communist China.
There is only one church -- which is the government ordained church.
Doctrine is controlled -- religious thought and expression is controlled
-- the clergy being ordained to their position by the state, is tightly
controlled -- by virtue of these controls, the church is never at odds with the
government -- and the very manner in which the people worship is also
controlled.
Genuine,
spiritual religion is suppressed, and anyone who deviates from the prescribed
doctrine of the government-church is immediately dealt with -- severely.
In
a Spiritual Church such as that which Jesus ordained, the focus is not on the
believer holding the proper set of beliefs, or a hierarchy of priests -- because
the source and authority is spiritual, and remains above and beyond the physical
world.
The belief's of each
person are therefore seen as a product of the people's stage of spiritual
development -- i.e., their spiritual condition -- and their level of
understanding is in direct accordance with the individual person's condition in
relation to man's spiritual reality.
Because each person is at a different level of spiritual awareness, fixed
creeds and dogma are a detriment to a truly spiritual religion.
Why Are sinners Tolerated? When
Celsus questioned why sinners were tolerated in the Pre-Nicene Church, he was
merely affirming the Apostle Paul's warning when he commanded:
“Do not be
unequally yoked together with unbelievers?” (2 Cor 6:14 NKJ).
To the degree that the Congregation of believers are commanded not even to eat
with sinners -- i.e., "But now I have written to you
not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or
covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner —
not even to eat with such a person"
(1 Cor 5:11 NKJV). Yet, the modern Church which is very much secular
and instutionalized, not only opens their doors
to sinners -- but does not even require a change of mind and lifestyle
(repentance) from their sinful ways. And while these people
may profess to be believers, their actions and thoughts of the heart reveal them
to be unbelievers. Why? Unbelievers are those who, because of their carnal thinking and
lifestyle, are spiritually undeveloped, and do not have a solid spiritual
connection with God.
They may
profess a belief in the Lord -- they may demonstrate the outward appearance of a
religious person -- they may even be a priest or member of the clergy -- but
because their heart and mind is focused on the things of this world, their
condition is carnal, and they are said to be of the flesh rather than the
spirit.
To
a Spiritual Church, these unbelievers who put on the appearance of being a
Christian are in fact an anchor to the soul of the Church, and cause it to be
grounded in the error and the dark ignorance of this world.
Being sinners, their condition is one of spiritual sickness -- they are incomplete and
not whole, and unable to connect with God in the true spiritual sense.
As both Celsus and the Apostle Paul warns, if they are in too great a
number, they will bring about the death and demise of the church itself.
In the end, the warning of Celsus, which merely reflected that same
warning in the Epistles of Paul, proved correct. And the Church
Father Origen who was commissioned by the Church to refute Celsus, has been
condemned as a heretic -- even though Origen was one of the greatest saints and
enlightened holy men in the history of the Church.
A government Church -- i.e., a secular institutionalized church not only welcomes sinners
--
but its strength and continued existence depends upon a large body of adherents
that Celsus calls sinners, and what Paul refers to as unbelievers.
Where a Spiritual, or Living Church must be accessed through man's
spiritual nature -- and innate spiritual nature that is dormant in those who are carnal in their thinking and
lifestyle -- the authority of an institutionalized church is very much of
this world -- and it is necessary that its members remain at a level below, and
in mental subjection to its body of pseudo-priests and clergy.
Genuine followers of the Christ would have nothing to do with the likes
of Constantine, and neither would they enter into a covenant with the secular
powers of this world.
Spiritual vs
Institutionalized Church: It
is important for us to recognize the fact that neither Celsus, Origen, the
Apostle Paul, or the Pre-Nicene Church could have been imbued with the thinking
that too many sinners or unbelievers were detrimental to the religion of Jesus
and TheWay, unless
they possessed what we call a Gnostic mindset -- and their church was built upon a
spiritual framework. But since the
mere use of the word Gnosis and Gnostic causes modern Christians to be alarmed,
it is important to understand the meaning of the word Gnosis from a higher
perspective of soul and spirit. Quoting from
The Reality
Of Gnosis: Gnosis is the Greek word meaning Spiritual Knowledge -- and
True Gnosis is defined as Knowledge received directly from God. Gnosis cannot be
found in a book -- it cannot be taught by another man or teacher of this world
-- and it is representative of a higher spiritual reality that simply cannot be
redefined by man. Gnosis is the Greek word which indicates that revelationary
experiential Knowledge received directly from God -- and cannot be imparted by any other
Source. Which means that when quasi-religious and politically-religious
motivated people condemn Gnosis/Spiritual Knowledge as heresy, they are in every
way condemning and rejecting the Divine Manna/Knowledge imparted to the most religious and
spiritual of mankind, as heresy. Those who ignorantly condemn Gnosis, condemn
the Directly Acquired Knowledge of God. And the fact that, because of the politics of religion and
the fact that governments the world over have traditionally used religion as a
means to maintain rule and authority over the people, we can begin to understand
the very reason why genuine Mystics who have dedicated their lives to seeking
Spiritual Knowledge -- defined as Gnosis -- have concealed the means to acquire
this Spiritual Knowledge within the written text of the scriptures -- cloaked in
allegory, so it would not be revealed to carnal/organic man.
What
this means is that Gnosis has nothing to do with man's history --
nothing to do with any historical people, including Jesus and Mary
Magdalene (see
The Cult
Of The Worship Of Mary Magdalene) -- and what is presented in the
scriptures, is an allegorical portrayal of the forces and Laws at work
within the cosmology of one's own body, mind/soul and spirit. That
this body of esoteric knowledge is so important to preserve and protect,
is the reason why Mystics and Spiritual Disciples will write virtually
anything in the literal text -- even outlandish absurdities -- so long
as the unenlightened people of organic consciousness will insure it is
carried forth into future generations (see
An Inconvenient
Truth).
This
fact is further explored in Origen's reply to the allegations of Celsus, and in
his answer we can see revealed the true mission of the genuine Christian Church
that was ordained by Jesus and his Apostles.
Origen responded to the allegation of Celsus by explaining that:
“For there are in the divinity of the Word some helps towards the
cure of those who are sick”, meaning the sinners.
Origen then clarifies his statement and writes that these sinners are by
no means invited to “…participation in mysteries, then, and to fellowship
in the wisdom hidden in a mystery, which God ordained before the world to the
glory of His saints”.
To
demonstrate the biblical foundation of this great truth in Origen's reply to
Celsus, we can see the same exact message in the assertion of Paul that there
were different doctrines -- i.e., the
“milk” for the carnal believer
-- the lesser mysteries for the seeker -- and the deeper realties of the spirit
for the genuine Christian -- of which Origen wrote:
“Now, in answer to such
statements, we say that it is not the same thing to invite those who are sick in
soul to be cured, and those who are in health to the knowledge and study of
divine things. We, however, keeping both these things in view, at first invite
all men to be healed, and exhort those who are sinners to come to the
consideration of the doctrines which teach men not to sin, and those who are
devoid of understanding to those which beget wisdom, and those who are children
to rise in their thoughts to manhood, and those who are simply unfortunate to
good fortune, or -- which is the more appropriate term to use -- to blessedness.
And when those who have been turned towards virtue have made progress, and have
shown that they have been purified by the word, and have led as far as they can
a better life, then and not before do we invite them to participation in our
mysteries. ‘For we speak wisdom among them that are perfect’”.
What
we have demonstrated in this reply to Celsus by Origen is the framework of a
True Spiritual Church.
Contrary
to the structure of the modern church, the Word is presented at varying levels
in accordance with the needs of the individual.
The sinner is invited to partake of the healing of the Word -- and if
they repent, and have a change in heart and mind, they will have prepared
themselves to move onward.
After
purification from the transgressions and mindset of this world and servitude to
man's carnal nature, the minor mysteries can be revealed to the disciple --
which minor mysteries will then enable the disciple to begin the process of
attaining the next stage of birth, and gaining entrance to the spiritual kingdom within them (see
Gate Of Eden).
As the disciple gains spiritual strength and vitality, and develops his
innate spiritual attributes -- attributes which lie dormant in the carnal
believer -- the disciple is then able to take the hand of the Lord and walk in
the footsteps of the Master.
This
great spiritual truth is seen in the words of Origen when he writes regarding
the mysteries of God:
“…others
again, which to the pure in soul and body exhibit the revelation of the Mystery,
which was kept in secret since the world began, but now is made manifest by the
scriptures of the prophets, and by the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ”.
Origen then goes on to explain that the Christ will appear to, and teach,
everyone who will be His disciple and follow in His footsteps:
“…which
appearing is manifested to each one of those who are perfect, and which
enlightens the reason in the true knowledge of things”.
In these words Origen confirms the essence of Christian doctrine -- a
spiritual doctrine -- that even today, the Christ is the One and Only Teacher
for the genuine disciple of the Light (see
The True
Prophet).
These
words of Origen are of the utmost importance to the modern Christian in search
of the higher mysteries of the Gospel.
What he is saying confirms the essence of New Covenant thought with
respect to the existence of the
One Teacher who will instruct the faithful flock
when they have sufficiently purified themselves from the defilements of this
world. Where the objectives of the Pre-Nicene Spiritual
Church was to gain access and learn directly from the
One Teacher
who Jesus taught to seek out and learn from, these spiritual objectives were
deemed heresy by the pseudo-priests of the Institutionalized Church.
The
modern Christian is greatly inhibited in his spiritual knowledge by the fact that the Roman Church of the
fourth century threw away the keys to understanding the manner in which man
grows and evolves to perfection.
Instead,
the modern faith-based believers cling to the dogma of Pagan Rome, and the words of the Apostle when he proclaimed:
“For all have
sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23 KJV).
And because all have sinned, the modern Christian manufactures a perpetual array
of dogmatic excuses -- all of which the pseudo-clergy provide dispensations --
which have the effect of a continued imprisonment in the abyss of profound
ignorance.
In perceiving only a very limited vision of man's reality, we erroneously
conclude that man's natural state is sin, and he must be redeemed.
Because the sixth century Emperor Justinian forced a quasi-Darwinist
mindset upon the thinking of the church, we no longer understand that man's
spirit
is ever residing with God -- and our spirit is in fact depicted as the older son
in the parable of the prodigal son.
In
the parable, the elder son who remains with the father is older, because he
represents our pre-existent soul and spiritual natures that has transcended all time as we understand
it today.
What
Origen and the first Christians were working to build was in fact the very
essence and foundation of a Spiritual, or Mystical Church.
Those believers who purify the body in which they dwell, and seek the
teachings of the Spiritual Christ, rather than clinging to the
“Milk”
of the Gospel, are those who mature enough to receive the knowledge of the
Kingdom.
In understanding the
differences between this pre-Nicene church, and what remains today, it is
important to understand that the very word knowledge was of a multidimensional
nature -- i.e., the word used to describe the knowledge gained as the vision of
the disciple pierces beyond the great divide between this world and the Kingdom,
in the Greek is called “Gnosis” -- or Gnosticism.
When the more spiritual disciples of the Apostle Paul said to the carnal
Gentile converts, that man is saved through knowledge, they were speaking of the
knowledge -- or gnosis -- that was given to them by the Anointing of the Spirit
-- a knowledge that the carnal mind cannot receive, because spiritual truths and
reality appear as “foolishness” to them
(see
Mystery Of
The Gospel).
What they said was true because one cannot be Anointed without Knowing,
and one cannot know without being Anointed.
Thus, spiritual knowledge and the Anointing of the Light are synonymous
-- and this Anointing is in accord with each individuals spiritual condition!
Now
the carnal believers who are unable to perceive the true vision of man's
spiritual reality focused on Paul's doctrine of faith, without comprehending
that the faith which Paul preached was not an end to itself -- but rather, a
beginning of TheWay.
Because
many carnal believers were being misled by the manner in which they understood
what Paul wrote, James and other Ebionite Nazirene Christians intervened, as seen in the
words: “What use is it, my brethren, if a man says he has faith, but he has
no works? Can that faith save him? …Even so faith, if it has no works, is
dead, being by itself. But someone may well say, 'You have faith, and I have
works; show me your faith without the works, and I will show you my faith by my
works’” (James 2:14-18 NAS).
The
problem is explored in the words of the Barnes' Notes Commentary for James 2:26:
"...all history has shown, the statements of Paul on the subject of
justification are liable to great abuse. All the forms of Antinomianism have
grown out of such abuse, and are only perverted statements of his doctrine. It
has been said, that if Christ has freed us from the necessity of obeying the law
in order to justification; if he has fulfilled it in our stead, and borne its
penalty, then the law is no longer binding on those who are justified, and they
are at liberty to live as they please. It has been further said, that if we are
saved by faith alone, a man is safe the moment he believes, and good works are
therefore not necessary. It is possible that such views as these began to
prevail as early as the time of James, and, if so, it was proper that there
should be an authoritative apostolic statement to correct them, and to check
these growing abuses. If, therefore, James had, as it has been supposed he had,
any reference to the sentiments of Paul, it was not to correct his sentiments,
or to controvert them but it was to correct the abuses which began already to
flow from his doctrines, and to show that the alleged inferences did not
properly follow from the opinions which he held; or, in other words, to show
that the Christian religion required men to lead holy lives, and that the faith
by which it was acknowledged that the sinner must be justified, was a faith
which was productive of good works."
In
the teachings of the New Covenant, faith is the foundation -- and it is the
works of the spirit that opens the (mystical) gate between this realm and the
Kingdom within
(see
Gate Of Eden)
that enlightens the mind of the disciple with the (gnosis) knowledge of
the Light.
In order to begin
to get a right sense of the reality that is being conveyed in these terms, we
must understand that in the same way that gnosis has nothing to do with doctrine
and the concepts of carnal men, neither does the term works have anything to do
with the rituals or religious observances which was practiced by the secular
Jews and the later Roman Church.
True Works is the manifestation of the Gospel Teachings and Principles in the
life of the disciple/believer -- and has nothing to do with outward rituals in
the manner of the carnal Jews who Jesus condemned as the offspring of the Devil.
The
problem in the early church began to manifest when many of the Gentile converts
attempted to reinterpret the teachings of TheWay as a means of justification
and redemption from sin, whereby they could philosophically believe in Jesus and continue to
live a carnal lifestyle.
From
a gospel perspective, what these carnal believers were doing was embracing one
part of what Paul wrote, and ignoring the other parts. This is acknowledged by Barnes' Notes in the words:
“All
the forms of Antinomianism have grown out of such abuse, and are only perverted
statements of his doctrine. It has been said, that if Christ has freed us from
the necessity of obeying the law in order to justification; if he has fulfilled
it in our stead, and borne its penalty, then the law is no longer binding on
those who are justified, and they are at liberty to live as they please. It has
been further said, that if we are saved by faith alone, a man is safe the moment
he believes, and good works are therefore not necessary”.
Because
their perception of the gospel was fragmentary and incomplete, they naturally
ignored what they were unable to comprehend, and they were unable to perceive
the reality of what Paul was attempting to covey where he wrote:
“for if
you are living according to the flesh, you must die; but if by the Spirit you
are putting to death the deeds of the body, you will live. For all who are being
led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God” (Rom 8:13-14 NAS).
In the end perhaps the ultimate example of a spiritually illegitimate
doctrine is seen to have emerged out of this carnal reinterpretation of the
gospel message as it became embodied in the doctrine of Original Sin -- which
doctrine was conceived by the Latin Church Father St. Augustine -- whereby all
men were born in sin, and incapable of doing anything good.
Those
believers -- both Jewish and Christian -- who understood the essence of what
Jesus conveyed in the parable of the prodigal son -- that the soul and spiritual
natures pre-existed
the body, and our indwelling spiritual nature which is the very source of our
being, remains with the Father in the Kingdom -- were able to move their
thinking beyond the carnal perception of the Word, pierce the great divide
between this realm and the Kingdom, become enlightened by the illumination of
the Holy Spirit, and embrace the Truth and the Light. Those believers who clung to manmade carnal doctrines
-- doctrines that envisioned man's reality from the perception of the body, and
not the spirit -- caused the believers to fall into error.
Over
the course of the first four centuries the conflict raged between the carnal
Christians who called themselves Orthodox, the spiritual (Gnostic) Christians, and at times the original Jewish
Ebionite Nazirene believers who were often viewed as heretics by the majority of Gentile
converts.
The end of the
conflict came when the carnal Christians who called themselves Orthodox, entered into a covenant and alliance
with the Roman Emperor Constantine, who then annihilated both the spiritual
Christians and the Ebionite Nazirenes -- thereby making the very carnal
reinterpretation of the gospel message the winner of the controversy.
The
problem was that the carnal Christians were incapable of understanding the
Apostles words when he wrote: “What shall we say then? Shall we continue in
sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live
any longer therein?” (Rom 6:1-2 KJV). The ideas they developed that man was genetically
incapable of not being a sinner, and that even after becoming a Christian
continued to sin, negated the words of Paul when he wrote:
“Know ye not,
that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom
ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?”
(Rom 6:16 KJV).
One of their
paramount errors was their failure to perceive the words of Paul in their true
spiritual sense -- i.e., when Paul spoke of death he was not indicating the
death of the body, but more appropriately, the severing of the natural man from
his spiritual nature.
Thus,
as sinners, and men of the flesh, the essence of New Covenant theology -- which
was the spiritual perfection of the believer -- was simply beyond their
comprehension.
The
political leaders of the church -- men such as Augustine -- waged great battles
with those of an opposing viewpoint such as Pelagius, who championed the cause
that “Man is able, if he likes, to live without sin and keep the
commandments of God, in as much as God gives him this ability”.
Before we become offended by the early Christian idea that man can live a
life free of sin, it is important for us to recognize in the words of Pelagius
that he did not say that man has the power to live without sin -- but rather,
“God
gives him [man] this ability”.
What believer today would disagree with this statement?
The
political leaders of the church could not even begin to envision the secret to
the controversy when Jesus said: “Every kingdom divided against itself is
brought to desolation, and a house divided against a house falls” (Luke
11:17 NKJ).
It is not that
physical, or natural man had to become perfect -- but rather, that man only had
to break down the great wall of divide that separates his carnal self, from his
spiritual nature.
From
the perspective of the Old Testament symbolism, the plight of carnal man is
embodied in the reality of the unmarried and unfaithful woman. It is for this reason that James used the feminine
gender when he wrote: “Ye adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of
the world is enmity with God? Whosoever therefore would be a friend of the world
maketh himself an enemy of God. Or think ye that the scripture speaketh in vain?
Doth the spirit which he made to dwell in us long unto envying?” (James
4:4-5 ASV).
It is for this
same reason that the author of the Imitation of Christ used the feminine
gender when he wrote: “I WILL hear what the Lord God will speak in me.
Blessed is the soul who hears the Lord speaking within her”.
Throughout
the New Testament the Lord is often called the Bridegroom.
Why?
In the symbolism
of the scriptures male and female are viewed as opposite polarities -- sometimes
within the same realm, other times the disciple is portrayed as female, while
his soul or spiritual nature which resides in another parallel realm, is
correctly portrayed as
male. Thus, it is for this reason that both the Old and New
Covenant theology is often viewed as being obsessed with the absolute purity of
the wife.
Why? So she will be a fit vessel for the husband -- i.e.,
which husband could be either the soul or spiritual nature of the disciple --
and is even used to portray the relationship between the Son of God and the
disciple.
It
is impossible to understand either the inner meaning of the scriptures, the
relationship between this physical world and the parallel spiritual realms, or
any other aspect of life and Creation without comprehending the all pervading
force of male and female energies that interact and bring all things into
existence throughout all worlds and dimensions of Being.
What few people are cognizant of is the fact that all the secrets of
Creation can be understood as men and women seek out and explore the true depth
of their own relationship one with another.
In the same way that an unfaithful wife squanders away the vital Creative
Life-Force that is indigenous to the male or positive power of Creation, so too do we
squander away the vital life-force that flows into us from our indwelling soul
and spiritual natures when we permit ourselves to become entangled in the
elemental things of this world.
Because
all that is manifest exists and has it’s being within the Two Great Powers of
Creation -- and these Two Great Powers move out into Creation and remain present
in every life-form that holographically exists throughout every realm and dimension of Being,
once the Divine Pattern is fully understood, this knowledge can then be used to
unlock the Mysteries and Sacred Secrets of the Eternal-God.
Widows And
Orphans - The Spiritual Birth Within Us:
That mankind is represented as the lost prodigal sons -- and that man is
portrayed as being feminine in relation to his indwelling spiritual
nature -- is demonstrated in both the statement in the Epistle of James
and the most used Gospel of the early Church which was the Shepherd of
Hermas. The Epistle of James reads:
“Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and
faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress
and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world”
(James 1:27 NIV)
-- but when it is understood that the term
Widows
and Orphans possess a spiritual meaning that is not at all
understood by those whose minds are in a carnal condition, the above
words of Origen pertaining to the early pre-Nicene Church takes on a new
and important spiritual meaning. As explained by Origen, the
term
Widows and
Orphans does not at all pertain to a woman whose husband had
physically died -- but rather, orphans are defined as
“youthful minds are admonished, who have
not yet deserved to have God as their Father, and are on that account
styled orphans”. With regard to
widows Origen writes:
“They, again, are the widows, who have withdrawn themselves from the
unjust man, to whom they had been united contrary to law; but who have
remained widows, because they have not yet advanced to the stage of
being joined to a heavenly Bridegroom”.
Widows and Orphans are
therefore the allegorical portrayal of believers who are in the process
of transition and transformation -- with a woman who is a fit wife of
the Bridegroom, no longer losing vital life-force -- or what is
portrayed as the inheritance of the prodigal son -- being squandered
away on the things of this world.
What
this ultimately means is that when our consciousness -- our vital energies --
and our focus in life is projected into this world, we are the lost prodigal
sons who squander away our inheritance -- i.e., the adulteress and
unfaithful wife who is the sinner and evil doer that must be redeemed.
Our sin -- and for that matter, the very nature of sin from a biblical
and spiritual perspective -- can only be truly understood when be begin to
perceive the very incomplete nature of our physical being.
When we are no longer the
“house divided” that Jesus condemned
as a fatal flaw, and we become married to our inner spiritual nature by the
mystical refocusing of our consciousness and vital energies with the spouse of
our soul, we take on the attributes which are portrayed in scripture as the
virgin -- undefiled from the world -- who gives birth to the Child of the Light
-- or the Son of God within us.
Because
the political leaders of the church embraced a carnal and pagan reinterpretation and
perception of the Word, the believers who adhered to the doctrines of the Church
of the Roman Empire became helplessly lost in their quest to walk in The Way.
The problem is that the Christian world continues to remain helplessly
lost because they no longer possess the knowledge of the Divine Pattern of
Creation -- and neither do they understand the workings of the laws that control
this realm -- the laws that control the interaction between man’s physical,
soul and spiritual natures -- and especially the Royal Law that is spoken about
in the Epistle of James.
The
biblical concept that the flesh can do nothing good on its own, and is in need
of redemption, is the scriptural manifestation of the “house divided”.
What we must begin to realize is that from a biblical perception,
spiritual sterility is a sin. In view of the fact that natural man is feminine in
relation to his soul and spirit, the barren woman or the whore of this world is
viewed as a sinful creature.
In
the same way that a woman cannot conceive and give birth to a child without her
male counterpart, the idea of man's inherent sinful nature can only be
comprehended when one perceives man as being in a state of incompletion.
When
the disciple walks in TheWay, this division is overcome -- and the feminine,
carnal nature, becomes merged and married to its inner spiritual nature.
It is for this reason the Bible teaches that the wife must be in total
subjection to the husband -- or, in the mystical sense of the marriage, the
flesh to the spirit.
The
true dilemma of man's existence in this world was easier to comprehend when our
culture was based upon these biblical and spiritual realities.
Thus, the concept that woman was an integral part of the man is seen
demonstrated in our laws that predated our so-called modern times.
In
Blackstone's Law Commentary, under the common law, Book II,
Chapter XXIX, VI, marriage is described as the absolute merger of husband and
wife into a single legal identity:
“…By marriage, the husband and wife
are one person in law... The very being or legal existence of the woman is
suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into
that of the husband, under whose wing, protection, and cover she performs
everything; and is therefore called… a femme-covert; and her condition during
her marriage is called her coverture”.
In
Law, the concept of the unity of husband and wife as a single person was so
complete, that a married woman was even absolved of full criminal responsibility
for her own conduct: “…criminal acts committed by a woman in her
husband's presence were assumed to be done under the husband's command, and he
was therefore held responsible” (The Law of Domestic Relations by Homer
Clark, St. Paul, Minn, West Publishing Co., 1968, p. 229). As U.S. Supreme Court Justice Black observed:
“…this rule has worked out in reality to mean that though the
husband and wife are one, the one is the husband”
(Law, Society, and
Industrial Justice by Philip Selznick, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969,
p. 53).
Once
properly understood, the Bible is neither sexist, nor is it anti-woman, as
falsely envisioned by many people today.
These polarities -- male and female -- are holographically true and
relevant on every level of our being -- and are used in the manner as depicted
in the scriptures, because we are actually living the polarities of Creation
throughout every aspect of our daily lives.
Moreover, this is not only the case in relation to men and women, but
also our multi-dimensional nature -- which ultimately means that we are living
out the very blue-print and Design of all of Creation.
That we are a reflection of our pre-existent soul -- and that if we are
to overcome this world we must be in total subjection to our soul that is not
manifest in this world or our physical body-vessel (see
The Reality Of The
Soul And Cosmology of Mind And Being) -- is
something that cannot be negated through all the political correctness that we
can imagine and create.
Why?
Because the being we truly are can only be perceived and realized from
the reality of our soul which not only has projected us into this world (see
Man As An
Embryonic Soul-Image), but is
the very immediate source of our being.
That each level of mind and being within us is a projected image of the level
which precedes it -- i.e., God into our individual spiritual nature, spirit into
soul, soul into physical -- means that our immediate obstacle is to overcome the
wall of division that separates us from our pre-existent soul.
Moreover, because the vital life-force upon which our personality and
consciousness springs forth in its own unique individuality, originates with God
and flows through our spiritual and soul natures prior to entering into us, our
soul is male (positive polarity) in relation to us (reflected polarity). What this means is that when we attempt to ignore
reality and cling to cultural philosophy and political correctness, we end up
being unfaithful to our true self -- and ultimately, we make ourselves less by
attempting to live in accordance with traditions, falsehoods, and counterfeit
doctrines that we have ourselves manufactured.
People
in search of Spiritual Truth endeavor to mold their lives in accordance with the
Divine Pattern of Creation.
Philosophy
-- opinion -- manmade religious dogma -- political correctness -- gender
re-engineering -- is all meaningless from the perspective of man’s higher
reality.
It is for this
reason that in a genuine Jewish and Christian spiritual community which attempts
to manifest the higher reality of God and Man, the people recognize that the
most gain is always accomplished when each individual explores and perfects the
role in life they were born into.
Are
you a woman?
A man?
Then learn what it is to be a woman or a man -- and especially in
relation to the opposite sex.
Overcoming
the natural barriers of the physical world in which we dwell is not easy.
When we can use the indigenous powers and energies of the body, and
channel them in the direction we wish to move, the task is made much more
simple, because it is natural to one's present state of being.
Man As A Soul-Embryo: What
we are making reference to is the relationship between the soul -- or active
principle -- and the natural person of this world which is embryonic and
reflective of the soul.
In
the designs of our Creator, people prepare themselves to embrace the unity of
the soul by first learning to move into an abiding Oneness with their physical
spouse.
In a spiritual
community, men and women live out this all-encompassing mystical concept, which
is a foundational principle of the teachings that Jesus taught as The Way.
It is an abiding truth that the flesh, without the union of spirit, could
do nothing good on its own, and was in need of redemption -- or marriage with
man's spiritual nature.
Thus,
it is not that the carnal nature of man is evil -- but rather, carnal man exists
in a state of incompletion.
It
is not until we begin to understand that from a spiritual perspective, all evil
is the result of this incompletion, that we are able to get a more perceptive
vision of man’s higher reality.
Historically,
the problem is that when carnal men who did not comprehend the unity of the
flesh with the pre-existent soul and spirit, attempted to reinterpreted the Word
and embody their very limited perception of reality into a secular institution
founded upon manmade doctrines and creeds, the whole spiritual focus and
direction of the teachings of Jesus became altered and misdirected from its
original course.
As
the Apostle states, spiritual reality is foolishness to the carnal mind that
envisions itself as originating with the body (see
Mystery Of The
Gospel). It is foolishness, because carnal man cannot perceive
anything beyond the three-dimensional barrier of this realm, and is incapable of
comprehending his origination as an embryonic projected image of man’s
indwelling pre-existent soul.
When
we therefore erroneously view ourselves as being the offspring of men and women,
instead of the image of our soul projected into this world -- which soul and
spiritual natures are the offspring of the One God -- we simply cannot perceive
of the very essence and meaning of both life and the scriptures.
The result is that we fail to see Jesus in accordance with his own words
spoken to us: “Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am returning to
my Father and your Father, to my God and your God’”
(John 20:17 NIV).
Thus, we fail to see the relationship between our pre-existent soul to
that of Jesus, and do not comprehend the meaning of Jesus' teachings that we are
all the prodigal sons of our Father.
The result is that we are forced to create doctrine upon doctrine in our
attempt to explain spiritual mysteries that are beyond our ability to
comprehend.
It
is because we open the Bible with preconceived notions that were infused upon
our modern ideas of religion by the Church of the Roman Empire, and we cling to
the doctrines of men in our search for truth, that we fail to perceive that the
teachings of The Way is the return of the prodigal son through the marriage and
merger of our inner, pre-existing spiritual nature -- overcoming the dilemma of
a "house divided cannot stand"
syndrome. We fail to grasp the very essence of what Jesus taught
when he told us: Turn about, and change the mind as seen in the English
translation of the scriptures where it states:
“Repent, for the kingdom of
heaven is at hand” (Matt 3:2 NAS) -- instead of the original meaning of
the Greek which literally means to “change the mind” -- conveying the
true spiritual meaning to “Open and unloose the mind, for the kingdom of
heaven is at hand”.
Under
the dominion of the Pagan Roman doctrines that we cling to today, we cannot even
conceive of how the Kingdom can be found when we
“Open and unloose the
mind” -- which is a core teaching of the New Covenant.
It
is because the Church of Rome threw away the
Keys of Knowledge, that we lack an
understanding of these fundamental spiritual precepts today -- precepts which
represent the very elementary concepts of the
Mysteries of God.
The result of our no longer possessing the key of knowledge is seen in
our failure to comprehend the manner in which our own eventual perfection is
achieved.
Moreover, what
truly confuses the whole state of affairs is the fact that the concept that
carnal man is incapable of perfection is not wrong -- but can only be understood
by perhaps using an analogy: If a mutant disease suddenly killed all the males
in the world today, from the perspective of bearing children, all the remaining
women would be unable to procreate.
In
the same way that a woman without a man would be unable to bring forth a child,
so too is the natural mind of man incapable of bringing forth spiritual Life
without the union of his pre-existent soul and indwelling spirit.
The
result of our very limited perception of the Word is seen in the fact that
perfection is beyond our scope of vision because we neither understand it, nor
do we comprehend the process. Why?
Because as Christians our forefathers were raped and ravaged by the Pagan
Emperor and his diabolical servants, when the True Spiritual Christians were put
to death for refusing to accept the religious dogma and leadership of the
Emperor's Church of the Anti-Christ. In
clinging to the doctrines of men, the Christian world dwells in what Jesus
portrayed as the "outer darkness" of mind and being -- and they possess a very limited vision of Creation
-- i.e., we see only this three-dimensional world, and we fail to realize that
the biblical goal of perfection which is written about throughout every book of
the Bible is merely the overcoming of our own inner division of carnal-body
mind, soul-mind, and spiritual-mind.
Moreover, in failing to understanding that our soul and spirit not only
at present consciously exists in parallel realms, and in fact pre-existed the
physical body and carnal mind that we are using in this life, the whole process
and requirement of perfection as outlined in the scriptures makes absolutely no
sense to us.
The
result is that we have been alienated from Christianity in its original form,
because we no longer possess a very clear perception of the very threefold
nature of the pre-Constantine Gentile Church.
What this means is that in the same way that man is comprise of a
threefold nature -- i.e., physical, soul and spirit, so too is the scriptures,
as well as the original Gentile Church prior to the hostile takeover by
Constantine and Pagan Rome.
It
it’s original form, there was one segment of the body of believers who were
very carnal in their perception of the Word -- and these were they who both the
Apostle and the Church Father Origen spoke of as needing the
“milk”
of the Gospel.
Then there
were those who progressed beyond the limitations of this realm, and were souls
in search of truth -- and these were the disciples who had dedicated their lives
to a more perfect and spiritual understanding of the Word. And lastly, there was the mature Israelite or Christian
who had themselves become spiritual -- and in overcoming their inner division
and unity with the Divine Essence within them, these were spiritual men and
women who perceived and became a part of the very destiny of mankind itself.
It
is important for us to recognize that in the words of Origen we find it
demonstrated the difference between a carnal church of the flesh, and one of the
spirit.
Because Constantine
was not only carnal, but in every way a ruthless conscienceless despot who
embraced evil in everything he did, the church that he formed was born in the
image of its creator.
If
modern Christians find these words offensive, again let me set the words of your
own witness before you when Luther said of the Christian Church:
“…once
the holiest of all, has become the most licentious den of thieves, the most
shameless of all brothels, the kingdom of sin, death, and hell. It is so bad
that even Antichrist himself, if he should come, could think of nothing to add
to its wickedness” (Quoted in: The Great Thoughts; compiled by George
Seldes).
In
a Living Church, there is no reason for beliefs, opinions, dogma or doctrine,
because the Living Christ will come to each disciple -- and, in the words of
Origen, “enlighten the reason in the true knowledge of things”.
Beliefs, opinions, dogma and doctrine, must therefore be seen as an
obstacle in the path of the disciple in a Living Church.
Many
sincere Christians today have attempted to embrace the higher aspects of the
Gospel -- but it is near impossible for them to follow in a more spiritual path
so long as many of their foundational doctrines are drawn from the genetic well
of Constantine's Church.
When
we begin to recognize this, we will become aware of the fact that to truly
restore the Gospel to its original form, we must become very cognizant of our
religious genetic flaws.
How
can we continue to open our Bibles to the many warnings of the Apostle when he
writes that the carnal mind is incapable of comprehending the Spiritual Gospel
of Christ -- and observe where he plainly tells us that the Mysteries of God are
beyond even our ability to envision -- and yet, we condemn both the Hebrew
Messianic believers who Jesus himself personally revealed the higher truths of
the Gospel, as well as the original Gentile Church who claimed to have received
these incomprehensible mysteries directly from the Apostle Paul, as heretics?
Are these first and earliest of Christians truly heretics, or are we just
perceiving them through our own religious genetic flaw that we inherited when
the church that immerged from the Reformation retained many of the foundational
doctrines of the Church of Constantine?
Regardless of how much we pray and call upon the name of the Lord, we can
draw no nearer to Christ until we have truthfully and accurately answered this
question.
The Pre-existent Soul: One
of the things that the modern reader must keep in mind is the fact that Origen
had not yet been born when The True Word was first published.
In view of the fact that Origen was officially anathematized by the
Emperor Justinian in the year 553 because of his teaching on the pre-existence
of the soul (reincarnation), it must be remembered that when Origen defends the
Church's doctrines of belief in this matter, he is not defending any beliefs
that he was responsible for bringing into the church.
In refuting the attack of Celsus on the church, Origen is in fact
defending beliefs and doctrines that were very much a part of the Christian
Church prior to Origen even being born -- i.e., beliefs that originated in the
first and second centuries of our Common Era.
Where the 4th
century Church of Constantine put to death the Spirit of the Church (see
above
The
Corruption Of The Church), it's Spiritual Castration which totally
alienated the congregation of believers from comprehending even what was
left of a corrupted and spiritually sanitized New Testament (see
Bible Corruption),
was implemented in the 6th century. As an example of how
the Christian world was literally forced to adhere to the dogma of the
secular priests and emperors, when the doctrine of the pre-existent soul
was outlawed by the Emperor Justinian, the Britannica confirms that the
emperor then forced his will upon the Church when he
"...banished
the pope to
Egypt
, and afterwards to an island, until he accepted the Council, which he
ultimately did"
(see
http://Ebionite.com/reincarnation.htm ). After relenting to the
will of the emperor, and finely accepting the decree of the emperor
after seven months of imprisonment, it is reported that the pope met
with an untimely death before he could even return to the Vatican.
And while it is true that most of the modern-day doctrines of the Church
was forced upon the Christian world in this same violent manner -- and
the vast majority of modern-day believers are all victims of what has
come to be known as the Stockholm Syndrome -- the removal of this
important original teaching has had such far ranging implications, that
it has become impossible for modern believers and critics alike to even
begin to get a valid sense of the original Gospel meaning and
objectives. The modern Church is faith-based -- founded upon
blind-faith -- because the reader lacks the necessary tools to even get
a sense of the very purpose of the original teachings of TheWay. And
this secular imposed intervention where the Christian world was
literally forced to succumb to the decree of the emperor, has had the
far ranging effect of spiritually castrating the Church.
What the
Bible states is that the lives of each person is orchestrated and
scripted by the Laws -- and yet, without an understanding of the Laws
that the scriptures states controls all events in this world, the very
purpose and meaning of life itself will remain a perpetual enigma -- as
will the scriptures. Jesus himself taught that not even a sparrow can
“...fall to the ground apart from the
will of your Father” (Matt 10:29 NIV). And in the very next
verse Jesus applies this same reality to man and states that every hair
is accounted for -- i.e., "And even the very
hairs of your head are all numbered" -- and yet, the
Christian world remains totally ignorant with respect to the workings of
the Laws that orchestrate and brings about all events that transpire in
this world.
Though
Origen was eventually condemned by the later Church of the Roman Empire for
holding fast to these earliest of Christian beliefs, and Clement of Alexandria
was stripped of his sainthood, the entire church was basically condemned by the
later Roman Church for being too Hellenistic.
Were they?
It must be
realized that neither Origen, nor Clement were the authors of these doctrines.
Therefore, what the writings of these earliest of Church Fathers provide
us is a picture of the Church when it was truly a spiritual entity -- i.e.,
prior to the time when the infusion of government authority undermined and
destroyed the great spiritual foundation which was ordained by the Living Word.
It was at this period that the church was in its finest day -- when it
healed the sick, and opened the doors of the Kingdom to the disciple in search
of Truth.
Secret System? When
Celsus attacked the Church for being a
“secret system”, teaching some
a different doctrine than others, Origen replied:
“Moreover, since he
frequently calls the Christian doctrine a secret system, we must confute him on
this point also, since almost the entire world is better acquainted with what
Christians preach than with the favorite opinions of philosophers.
For who is ignorant of the statement that Jesus was born of a virgin, and
that He was crucified, and that His Resurrection is an article of faith among
many, and that a general judgment is announced to come, in which the wicked are
to be punished according to their desserts, and the righteous to be duly
rewarded?”
Fundamentally,
what Origen enumerated was elementary Christian doctrine 101 -- i.e., what the
Apostle Paul refers to as the “milk” -- or that basic doctrine which
still exists to this very day
(see
Mystery Of The
Gospel).
Origen
acknowledged these doctrines -- refuted Celsus by stating that these beliefs are
openly expounded as articles of Christian faith, and then Origen explained:
“And
yet the mystery of the Resurrection, not being understood, is made a subject of
ridicule among the unbelievers.
In
these circumstances, to speak of the Christian doctrine as a secret system is
altogether absurd.
But that there
should be certain doctrines, not made known to the multitude, which are after
the exoteric ones having been taught, is not a peculiarity of Christianity
alone, but also of philosophic systems, in which certain truths are exoteric and
others are esoteric.
Some of the
heroes of Pythagoras were content with his ipse dixit; while others were taught
in secret those doctrines which were not deemed fit to be communicated to the
profane and insufficiently prepared ears.
Moreover,
all the mysteries that are celebrated everywhere throughout Greece and the
barbarous countries, although held in secret, have no discredit thrown upon
them, so that it is in vain he endeavors to calumniate the secret doctrines of
Christianity, seeing that he does not correctly understand its nature”.
It
is important that the reader not skim over this rather profound statement that
was composed by
Origen in reply to
the allegations of Celsus with respect to the acknowledgement that Christianity
was is a secret system where some were taught differently than those who were
more spiritually mature.
Moreover,
what is imperative for the modern Christian to realize is that Origen -- whose
reply to Celsus represented the position of the whole Church on these matters --
states that there is another meaning in the doctrine of the resurrection that is
not understood by the multitude of believers who were of the simple faith.
In view of the fact that this allegation by Celsus was made against the
church before Origen was even born, we cannot take the position that the ideas
expressed in this document represent the personal beliefs of Origen.
Exoteric Doctrines
Designed For Entry-Level Believers: In
explanation, the doctrine of the physical resurrection of the body, says Origen,
is misunderstood by the spiritually unaware, and writes that it was
“preached
in the Churches… for the simpleminded and for the ears of the common crowd who
are led on to live better lives by their belief”. Why?
Because
the resurrection is a spiritual event that has to do with the perfection of the
soul, and is experienced in the rebirth of the disciple.
This was not a matter of belief or doctrine -- but rather, this
understanding was based upon the very experiences of the Spiritual Christians
who had themselves inherited the promise of the Christ! That
the True Esoteric Teachings could not be revealed to the entry-level immature
believers, is explored at the
Mystery Of The
Gospel.
With
regard to the mystery of the resurrection, St. Gregory, Bishop of Nyssa writes:
“Observe,
then, that I can hear David, in the midst of his praises in the Divine Songs,
saying at the end of the hymn of the hundred and third (104th) Psalm, where he
has taken for his theme God's administration of the world, 'Thou shalt take away
their breath, and they shall die, and return to their dust: Thou shalt send
forth Thy Spirit, and they shall be created: and Thou shalt renew the face of
the earth.' He says that a power of the Spirit which works in all vivifies the
beings into whom it enters, and deprives those whom He abandons of their life.
Seeing, then, that the dying is declared to occur at the Spirit's departure, and
the renewal of these dead ones at His appearance, and seeing moreover that in
the order of the statement the death of those who are to be thus renewed comes
first, we hold that in these words that mystery of the Resurrection is
proclaimed to the Church, and that David in the spirit of prophecy expressed
this very gift which you are asking about”.
According
to St. Gregory who expresses a biblically based opinion that is correct in the
spiritual sense of the concept, death is that condition when the Holy Spirit is
not present, and the mystery of the resurrection is experienced when the
disciple is again made alive by the Anointing of the Holy Spirit.
What this means is that Constantine -- a dead man who was deprived of the
life-giving spirit -- is the father of our present-day dogmatic perception of the word.
What it also means is that from a spiritual perspective, the resurrection
is experienced by those who are reborn -- not philosophically, in the manner of
born again Christians today -- but truly reborn into the very Kingdom that Jesus
declared was awaiting those who “opened and unloosed” their minds to
man's spiritual nature and reality (see
GateOfEden.com .
With
regard to the mystery of the virgin birth, St. Gregory writes:
“…we
conclude that the power of the Highest, coalescing with our entire nature by
that coming upon (the Virgin) of the Holy Ghost, both resides in our soul, so
far as reason sees it possible that it should reside there, and is blended with
our body, so that our salvation throughout every element may be perfect”.
We
can begin to perceive what Origen was speaking of when he wrote that:
“But
that there should be certain doctrines, not made known to the multitude, which
are after the exoteric ones having been taught”. If the Christian is to be so immersed in the symbolism
of the scriptures to the degree where each of us must be born of a virgin,
anointed, perfected, crucified, and resurrected into the spiritual Kingdom of
God, while we are still living in this body of flesh and blood, then -- and only
then -- can be begin to get the true sense of Jesus' requirement for his
followers when he stated: “If anyone would come after me, he must deny
himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life
will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save
it” (Mark 8:34-35 NIV).
Thus,
because we no longer perceive either the spiritual meaning, or the need to
become totally immersed in the biblical symbols, it can be easily demonstrated
that the religion we practice today is not the same religion that Jesus taught.
Among
the mysteries that were concealed from the masses who were too carnal to receive
the deeper truths of Christianity, was the doctrine of the pre-existence of the
soul.
Again, in his writing
known as The True Word, Celsus accused the Christian Church of teaching
the masses the spurious doctrine of heaven and hell in an after death state,
while teaching the elect the doctrine of reincarnation.
Though this may astonish the modern believer, Origen does not refute
Celsus, but rather explains that:
“But on these subjects much and that of a
mystical kind, might be said; in keeping with which is the following: It is good
to keep close the secret of a king, (Tobit xii, 7), in order that the doctrine
of the entrance of souls into bodies, not, however, that of the transmigration
from one body into another, may not be thrown before the common understanding,
nor what is holy given to the dogs, nor pearls be cast before swine.
For such a procedure would be impious, being equivalent to a betrayal of
the mysterious declaration of God's Wisdom”.
“It
is good to keep secret the entrance of souls into bodies”,
Origen writes, but “not… the transmigration from one body into another”. In other words, Origen openly acknowledges that the
pre-existence of the soul, as well as the doctrine of transmigration
(reincarnation) are openly revealed to Christians who have been purified and
matured sufficiently to comprehend the mysteries of God, while the knowledge of
why the soul even came into this world is kept secret, and is not openly
revealed to carnal minds.
In
explanation, Origen quotes scripture and writes
“It is good to keep close
the secret of a king”, and affirms that certain mysteries only belong to
the spiritually mature in the word, and that one should not permit
“what is
holy given to the dogs, nor pearls be cast before swine”.
Again,
because of the nature of what is being discussed, I will again repeat that it is
important to remember that these allegations against the church which Origen
responded to were made prior to Origen being born, and at a time when his mentor
Clement of Alexandria, did not yet hold a position or authority in the Church.
These charges -- i.e., that the spiritually mature were taught the
pre-existence and reincarnation of the soul, while the people of the simple
faith were taught the doctrine of heaven and hell -- were made against the
church when it was barely one hundred years old.
And, seventy years after these allegations were written, Origen
acknowledged that there was the exoteric Christian doctrine which was
“preached
in the Churches… for the simpleminded and for the ears of the common crowd who
are led on to live better lives by their belief”, and there was the
esoteric Christian doctrine, which revealed the sacred mysteries of God to those
who were cleansed from the defilements of this world.
Today
we can observe many Fundamentalist Churched teaching the Old Testament as an
historical and literal fact.
Yet,
the Apostle Paul called such teachers
“an instructor of the foolish, a
teacher of babes, having the form of knowledge and truth in the law” (Rom
2:20 NKJ).
What the carnally
minded failed to perceive is that all religious doctrines of the flesh are used
to convey great metaphysical truths of the spirit.
What is conveyed literally, according to the Apostle, is that the text of
the scriptures are merely a “form” of the truth, which is veiled, in
order to conceal what carnal man is unable to comprehend with his very limited
mental resources.
Why were
the deeper Christian mysteries concealed from the masses? The resolution to the problem is not to reveal to
carnal minds what they are incapable of comprehending, but to lead the believers
of the simple faith to the point where they are able to begin to participate in
the mysteries of life, and become immersed in these sacred truths, in order for
the believer to become a disciple, whereby they will be able to begin the
experience of manifesting the Kingdom in their own life.
The key word that must be understood here is
“immersed”, which
in no way can be construed to be the same as one who philosophically believes
without actual participation.
This
great truth is seen in Origen's reply to Celsus where he wrote:
“By
participation in the Son of God one is adopted as a son…
by
participation in the Holy Spirit is a man rendered holy and spiritual…”
and,
“every rational creature needs a participation in the Trinity”. Those who have not themselves yet uncovered their true
spiritual nature as the son of God, perceive sacred truths in forms, types, and
allegories -- because they, being carnal,
“cannot comprehend” the
mysteries of God that awaits them.
When
God, in the words of St. Nazianzen, no longer is an
“object of wonder”,
but rather an “object of desire” -- and we, desiring to be purified
from the defilements of this world, make ourselves fit vessels for the Lord to
indwell, the Spirit, according to St. Nazianzen, reveals to us our true nature,
and the revelation of this manifest Sacred Knowledge makes
“us like God; so
that when we have thus become like Himself, God may, to use a bold expression,
hold converse with us as Gods, being united to us, and that perhaps to the same
extent as He already knows those who are known to Him”.
St. Nazianzen then writes that
“the Divine Nature then is boundless
and hard to understand” by those who are yet carnal and think as natural
beings of this world.
Who
among us has attained to such a level of Godliness that God will
“converse
with us as Gods”?
It is
for this reason that Origen admits that the disciple of Christ knows full well
that growing to spiritual maturity is not a simple chore.
In the same way that a man cannot grow to maturity in the cycle of a day,
neither can the soul grow to its Godly potential in the cycle of one lifetime.
In the same way that a child grows to a man in steps, the soul has
transmigrated and inhabited many bodies of flesh in its quest for this necessary
level of Godliness.
It is
also the true disciple of Christ who knows that the Lord Jesus came to save us
from our fate of being lost in this world -- in subjection to the Law, ever
reincarnating in useless lives of suffering and spiritual depravation -- but
carnal man, refusing to follow in Jesus' footsteps, continually chooses the
darkness of this world over the Light of the kingdom.
The
question the modern believer must ask is this: Do you truly believe the words of
our Lord when He said: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one
comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6 NIV)?
If you believe these words, then you have only one option: You must be
ready to cast off the manmade doctrines of error that have become infused into
modern Christianity, and become a genuine disciple of the Light.
If you truly believe, then you must begin your search for the real Jesus.
The true Christians are not those who believe in the christ of
Constantine or the very carnal and Pagan doctrines of the Roman Church -- but
rather, those who realize that they must have Jesus of Nazareth, and no other.
True Christians know that it is not enough to believe, they must believe
the Truth -- which Truth can only be received directly from the Lord.
The
problem is that in our quest for truth, we have been greatly misled.
Our experts, scholars and theologians do not know the real Jesus.
In the words of A. Powell Davies:
“Biblical scholars were not
disturbed by what they found in the Dead Sea Scrolls because they had known all
along that the origin of Christianity was not what was commonly supposed to have
been”.
Many of these
same biblical scholars have written numerous books warning the believer that the
foundation of church doctrine today was not born on the shores of Galilee at the
beginning of our Common Era -- but rather, Rome in the fourth century. Yet, the message of the biblical scholar has left a
great void in the understanding of the believer.
Why?
Our scholars
themselves cannot tell us what to believe, because they were not there when the
Lord physically walked the earth.
In
truth, they cannot tell you what they do not know.
Biblical
scholars such as Wescott and Hort have openly stated that the original text of
the Bible has been lost -- and because of the missing pieces, they are unable to
restore what they no longer possess.
What the scholar and experts from all disciplines can tell you is that:
The historical church -- the Roman Church whose hands believers today received
their gospel -- threw away the most important aspects of Jesus' teachings when
they recreated the church as a secular institution -- and adopted the doctrines
of Constantine and Pagan Rome -- who is in every way described as a dead man who
was deprived of the spirit.
Thus,
our experts, scholars and theologians cannot help us in our search of the true
teachings of Jesus.
If
it is true that an important part of the original teachings of Jesus has been
lost by the fourth century church, we must then ask the question as to how a
believer today can find the truth?
There
is only one way.
Each
Christian must seek the truth from the True Prophet that the Apostle Peter
taught lies dormant within each and every person, and which Prophet can meet and
teach each one of us within our own minds and being.
The answer lies in the very first principles of the gospel where it
reads:
“Repent, for the
kingdom of heaven is at hand” (Matt 3:2 NAS) -- except we must truly
repent through change, and the process of “opening and unloosing the
mind” in order to enter the Heavenly Kingdom that the Lord testified is at
hand.
If
we truly believe the teachings of Jesus, we cannot sit passively by without
coming to terms with the words of Prof. Allegro when he warned that:
“It is
a fact that the Qumran Library has profoundly affected the study of the
Johannine writings and many longheld conceptions have had to be radically
revised”.
Thus, we must ask
the question: What longheld conceptions must we radically revise in order to
begin to comprehend the true meaning of the New Testament, and especially the
Gospel of John?
Every
Sunday we listen to accepted religious authorities preach the gospel -- stating,
one only has to have faith to be saved. Yet, experts such as Prof. Allegro warn us that what is
being preached has little in common with the religion that Jesus taught.
The first flaw in our thinking has to do with our perception of the
scriptures themselves. When we pose the question as to why we can't just
simply read the scriptures like we have been doing?
The answer lies in Prof. Allegro's statement that John's
“…gnosticism,
and the whole framework of his thought is seen now to spring directly from a
Jewish sectarianism rooted in Palestinian soil, and his material recognized as
founded in the earliest layers of Gospel traditions.”
Thus, the problem lies in the fact that our mindset today is very
different -- and almost opposite -- to the mindset of the authors of our
Gospels.
Why?
If it is true that John and the other authors of our scriptures wrote
from the framework of Gnostic thought, then the whole direction of even the
manner we traditionally search for truth must be radically altered.
Few
Christians today possess any comprehension whatsoever with respect to the
meaning of the term Gnostic?
Webster's
Dictionary defines the word Gnostic as being the Greek word for Knowledge.
Roget's Thesaurus lists the word Gnostic as an alternative meaning of the
word discerning -- which is defined as
“showing insight and
understanding; discriminating” by Webster's.
Thus the word denotes those people who possess knowledge -- and
especially knowledge through direct spiritual experience -- in contradistinction
to those people who believe as an exercise in faith in the unknown.
In many respects the word Gnostic is synonymous with words such as
spiritual, mystical, paranormal, metaphysical, supernatural and transcendental
-- in that it has to do with the acquisition of knowledge gained directly from
sources beyond the physical senses of man.
When
the scriptures state that “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must
worship him in spirit and in truth” (John 4:24 KJV), the means by which we
learn to worship God in spirit, rather than in the flesh, is through the
acquisition of spiritual knowledge.
In
our natural state we are limited to using less than ten percent of our potential
of mind, because these parts of the mind relate to our soul and spiritual
nature.
When we begin to
grasp this greater reality, we begin to comprehend that the spiritual knowledge
that is acquired though direct interaction with inner sources beyond man's
physical nature is called “gnosis”, and is the foundation of the spiritual
or Gnostic temple.
What
did the first Christians believe?
Did
they believe the same faith-based doctrine as Christians do today?
The answers to this question will shock many modern believers as they
begin to examine the legacy of writings that have been preserved -- writings
that the majority of Christians today haven't the slightest idea exist, and even
fewer realize the message they convey.
Much
of what will be presented in the following pages will be from the writings of
the earliest of Church Fathers.
St.
Clement, who was the first century disciple of Peter who is mentioned by Paul in
Philippians 4:3.
Clement of
Alexandria, who was the most authoritive Christian voice in the second century.
Origen, who was Clement's pupil and head teacher of the Christian school
in Alexandria.
Who
were these people?
In the
writings of the second century Church Father Clement of Alexandria, he speaks of
himself as “preserving the tradition of the blessed doctrine derived
directly from the holy Apostles, Peter, James, John and Paul.”
In the introduction to Clement of Alexandria in the Anti-Nicean Library
it states: “Alexander, bishop of Jerusalem, speaks of Clement, in turn, as
his master: 'for we acknowledge as fathers those blessed saints who are gone
before us, and to whom we shall go after a little time; the truly blest
Pantaenus, I mean, and the holy Clemens, my teacher, who was to me so greatly
useful and helpful.' St. Cyril of Alexandria calls him 'a man admirably learned
and skillful, and one that searched to the depths all the learning of the
Greeks, with an exactness rarely attained before.' So Theodoret says, ‘He
surpassed all others, and was a holy man.' St. Jerome pronounces him the most
learned of all the ancients; while Eusebius testifies to his theological
attainments, and applauds him as an 'incomparable master of Christian
philosophy’”.
In
the case of Clement's pupil, Origen, he was not a convert -- his father was a
Christian martyr.
Origen is
called “…the most prominent of all the church fathers”
(Encyclopedia. Britannica), and was considered by Jerome to be
“the
greatest teacher of the Church after the Apostles.”
St. Gregory of Nyssa called him
“the prince of Christian learning in
the Third Century.”
Eusebius,
who is known as the Historian of the early church, writes of Origen that he
“…clung
firmly to the Christian principles his parents had taught him, as this record
has already shown”.
Speaking
of Origen's saintly life, Eusebius writes that:
“While Origen was
performing his normal tasks at Caesarea, his services were in constant demand
not only by the local people but also by innumerable foreign students who had
left their own countries.
The most
distinguished names known to me are those of Theodore - who was none other than
that illustrious bishop of my own day, Gregory - and to Greek and Roman studies,
but he implanted in them a love of true philosophy and induced them to exchange
their old enthusiasm for a theological training. Five whole years they spent with him, making such remarkable
progress in theology that while still young, both were chosen to be bishops of
the churches in Pontus”.
As
we review the writings of the early Church Fathers, it is important to keep in
mind that these men, and especially Origen who was perhaps the most prolific
writer in Church history, represent an example of Christian thought over the
first three centuries.
With
regard to Origen, we should ever be cognizant of the fact that Origen was not
just another presbyter -- but rather, someone who was considered the very
example of orthodoxy in his day.
In
his introduction to Origen in the Anti-Nicean Library, Rev. Frederick Crombie
writes:
Origen
[A.D. 185-230-254] The reader will remember the rise and rapid development of
the great Alexandrian school, and the predominance which was imparted to it by
the genius of the illustrious Clement. But in Origen, his pupil, who succeeded
him at the surprising age of eighteen, a new sun was to rise upon its noontide.
Truly was Alexandra “the mother and mistress of churches” in the benign
sense of a nurse and instructress of Christendom… As was to be expected, the
fame of the great Alexandrine teacher was not confined to his native city, but
spread far and wide; and an evidence of this was the request made by the Roman
governor of the province of Arabia to Demetrius and to the prefect of Egypt,
that they would send Origen to him that he might hold an interview with one
whose reputation was so great… The character of Origen is singularly pure and
noble; for his moral qualities are as remarkable as his intellectual gifts. The
history of the Church records the names of few whose patience and meekness under
unmerited suffering were more conspicuous than his… To him belongs the rare
honor of convincing heretics of their errors, and of leading them back to the
Church; a result which must have been due as much to the gentleness and
earnestness of his Christian character, as to the prodigious learning, marvelous
acuteness, and logical power, which entitle him to be regarded as the greatest
of the Fathers.
In
his Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, by Dr. F. H.
Scrivener, one of the ablest of modern-day biblical scholars and critics writes
of Origen: “Origen is the most celebrated biblical critic of antiquity. His
is the highest name among the critics and expositors of the early Church. He is
perpetually engaged in the discussion of various readings of the New Testament,
and employs language, in describing the then existing state of the text, which
would be deemed strong if applied even to its present condition, after the
changes which sixteen more centuries must needs have produced… Seldom have
such warmth of fancy and so bold a grasp of mind been united with the lifelong,
patient industry which procured for this famous man the honorable appellation of
Adamantius.”
The
biblical scholar Wescott says of the Church Father Origen that:
“We have
not yet made good the positions which he marked out as belonging to the domain
of Christian philosophy” (Religious Thought In the West, p. 252).
What Wescott makes reference to is that spiritual concepts which were at
one time openly accepted as belonging to Christian orthodoxy -- concepts that
were the foundation of what Jesus taught to his disciples -- and the disciples
taught to their disciples -- have in later centuries become rejected by the
institutionalized church.
Why?
As we move from the first to the second century, the second to the third,
the third to the fourth, the fourth to the Reformation, and the Reformation to
modern times, the spiritual connection to God became severed, and the Church was
left with little more than it’s doctrinal beliefs about God, its faith in the
unknown, and its manmade dogma.
As
we examine some of the writings of the earliest of Christians, the paramount
picture that will emerge will reveal a mindset that is not only opposite to our
own today, but totally spiritual in nature.
Where we are very Darwinist in our thinking -- and as such we often
exhibit a mindset that is anti-Gnostic -- we have lost the knowledge of the
spiritual Kingdom that is accessed via heretofore unknown dimensions that exist
within our own mind and being.
It
is these early Christian concepts -- concepts that were orthodox in their time
-- concepts that were Christian prior to the time of either Origen or Clement of
Alexandria -- spiritual concepts that were later rejected as the church became a
secular institution of the flesh, rather than the spirit, that will assist us in
our quest to recover the True Teachings and Revelation of Christ.
In view of our new found archeological discoveries that shatter our
understanding of Christian beginnings, it is these concepts that we must again
understand in order to once more possess the keys to the Kingdom -- a Kingdom
that has no place in an institutional secularized church.
When
Jesus said to his disciples: “The secret of the kingdom of God has been
given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables so
that, 'they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never
understanding…’” (Mark 4:11-12 NIV), Jesus was explaining to his
disciples that the knowledge -- or gnosis -- of the secrets and mysteries of
God, do not belong to the people who are
“outside” of the Kingdom,
but rather only to Israel -- who are the chosen people of God -- the disciples,
spiritual elect or initiates that the Lord reveals his Mysteries and Sacred
Secrets to.
In
the words of the Church Father Origen:
“And if you come to the books
written after the time of Jesus, you will find that those multitudes of
believers who hear the parables are, as it were, 'without', and worthy only of
exoteric doctrines, while the disciples learn in private the explanation of the
parables.
For, privately, to His
own disciples did Jesus open up all things, esteeming above the multitudes those
who desired to know His wisdom” (Origen Contra Celsum).
In other words, those who are outside of the spiritual Kingdom were given
only the parables and the exoteric doctrines -- which doctrines the Apostle
calls the “milk intended for babes in Christ” -- and only the
disciples received the revelation of the Mysteries of God.
From
a New Covenant perspective: A true teacher of God's Word is one that leads men
into the house, and this is seen in Jesus' condemnation of the Scribes and
Pharisees when he said: “But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites,
because you shut off the kingdom of heaven from men; for you do not enter in
yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in”
(Matt 23:13
NAS).
If our modern church
doctrines were compatible with original New Covenant teachings, and salvation
was through mere belief in Jesus, then Jesus would not have said the above words
to the leaders of the Jews -- but would have more appropriately stated:
“But
woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you shut off the kingdom
of heaven from men; for you do not yourselves believe in God's only begotten Son
in whom all men must acknowledge, nor do you allow those who are listening to
your doctrine to believe”.
Because
they failed to apply the scriptures and the Law of Moses within themselves, and
they created rituals and traditions that were to be practiced outwardly in
worldly temples and synagogues, they made themselves. In their building of a worldly temple made with hands
(Acts 7:48) -- their inauguration of a class of priests and teachers that
replaced the One Teacher -- their creation of doctrines and dogma that replaced
the true spiritual teachings received directly from God -- made the scribes and
Pharisees counterfeit because they
“shut off the kingdom of heaven from
men”.
If the kingdom of
God was something to believe in, then Jesus never would have said:
“for you
do not enter in yourselves” -- enter in what?
The New American Standard (NAS) translation at this sighting is very
interesting in that it could pertain to entering into something -- like a house
-- or, we could read it exactly as it appears, and understand that the scribes
and Pharisees did not “enter in yourselves” -- which is exactly where
Jesus said the Kingdom of God exists (Luke 17:21 KJV).
What
Jesus is revealing is the very foundation of Gnostic and mystical teaching --
i.e., that the Kingdom exists within each of us, and we must enter within this
Kingdom in order to find true salvation.
This is a truly difficult thing for the carnal mind to envision because
it has long grown accustomed to only looking outwardly.
The carnal mind does not perceive that it sits upon a great divide
between two worlds -- one that is outer and is a reflection of what is real --
the other is an inward world that is the active principle of man’s true
reality.
That the fourth
century church which was ruled over by heathen pagans, was unable to perceive
the inner Spiritual Temple, and fell into the same exact error that Jesus
condemned in the Pharisees and Sadducees -- an error that he did not see in the
Essenes.
Those
whose mind and perception have been opened by the Holy Spirit, and
have gazed across the great divide between heaven and earth, perceive
this world as an illusion of manifest form.
Yet,
it is a great deal more than an illusion as many Eastern Religions and Greek
Philosophers have proclaimed.
What
only a very few of the more spiritually enlightened seekers truly come to
realize, is that everything in this world is a pattern that is an allegorical
reflection of the other world.
The
result is that when we are able to perceive the pattern in its true naked state
-- stripped of its allegorical form -- we begin to perceive the reality that
lies beyond this three dimensional world.
The problem is that because we do not understand the multidimensional
significance of what we perceive, we ignore the many warnings in the Bible with
regard to man's inability to see reality because we are unable to come to terms
with the fact that what we see in this world is a reflection -- a reflection
that is both an illusion, and an allegory that is a pattern and form of what is
real and spiritual.
Thus, one
truth does not negate another truth in the eyes of a truly enlightened soul.
To contact the author: Allan_Cronshaw@nazirene.org
|
|
Part Two
Over the course of the first three
centuries there were Christians who
believed that Jesus did not even have a
physical nature. Because his body was
in fact a perfected physical nature, it
could be said that if Jesus was to
appear physically before us, what we
would see would be a projection that
originates in the realm of higher
spiritual reality. When the Bible
states of Jesus that:
“But passing
through their midst, He went His way”
(Luke 4:30 NAS) -- what is being
conveyed is that he simply became
invisible by retracting his physical
form that was projected into this realm,
and departed from the crowd that was
intent on killing him. A soul of his
stature who has conquered and perfected
the Laws of God within him, has this
type of power that is beyond the
comprehension of natural organic man in
his carnal state of being.
If
we possessed scriptures that were more
pure, we would quickly understand that
if we desire to come face to face with
reality, then we must seek to see beyond
the reflection, and into the world that
is real. It is this desire to come
face to face with reality that prompted
the Apostle to write:
“even though
we have known Christ according to the
flesh, yet now we know Him thus no
longer” (2 Cor 5:16
NAS). This spiritual Christ, over the
historical Christ in the flesh, was what
biblical scholar Rudolf Bultmann was
speaking of when he concluded that the
“…Christian faith is, and should be,
comparatively uninterested in the
historical Jesus and centered instead on
the transcendent Christ”
(Encyclopedia Britannica, 1998
electronic edition) -- transcendent,
meaning, the source of the projection
from the other side of the great divide.
Belief in Jesus, then, means that we
possess sufficient faith to follow him
into the Kingdom that he declared.
That we cannot presently accomplish this
feat, does not mean that we cannot
develop these abilities that are already
indigenous to our soul and spiritual
natures. It is for this reason that
such great importance was placed upon
picking up one's cross, and following in
the Master's footsteps. Belief alone
cannot open the door to the Kingdom --
but rather, belief and faith in the Lord
in conjunction with divinely imparted
knowledge and spiritual manifestation.
The Kingdom is not something to be
believed in -- but rather, to be entered
into while one is still physically alive
in this world. One cannot be taught
about the Kingdom -- we can only be
taught how to enter into the Kingdom.
Therefore, those of us who the Bible
speaks of as being “without”,
are taught in parables -- which are
images that contain within themselves
great spiritual truths. On the other
hand, those who are willing to go
“in the house” with the
Lord, are taught all things -- which
things are spoken of as the Mysteries of
God to those who are
“without”
-- Mysteries, because they are beyond
the comprehension of the carnal mind of
man which only uses less than ten
percent of its potential.
Clement, the first century disciple of
Peter writes of these mysteries:
“James the
Righteous, John and Peter were entrusted
by the Lord after his resurrection with
the higher knowledge. They imparted it
to the other apostles, to the seventy…”
(Outlines Book VIII). This higher
knowledge that was entrusted only to the
soul portrayed as his brother and the
direct disciples of Jesus, is what
Christians today are in search of, and
what was thrown away by the Church of
the Roman Empire.
With regard to the Secret Doctrine of
Jesus, Origen writes that Jesus
“conversed with
His disciples in private, and especially
in their sacred retreats, concerning the
Gospel of God; but the words which He
uttered have not been preserved, because
it appeared to the evangelists that they
could not be adequately conveyed to the
multitude in writing or in speech… and
they saw… what things were to be
committed to writing, and how this was
to be done, and what was by no means to
be written to the multitude, and what
was to be expressed in words, and what
was not to be so conveyed”.
In
these words Origen is here revealing an
important concept -- a phrase that
differentiates the gospel of Christ --
or what is commonly called the Good News
that was preached to the masses of
people -- and that doctrine that was too
sacred to be written, and is herein
called the
“Gospel of God”.
Origen says of this Gospel that it
“could not
be adequately conveyed to the multitude
in writing or in speech”.
What Origen is confirming is that the
Gospel of God has never been written in
a document of any kind that you could
read, as you do other religious
writings. It is this great truth that
is expressed in the words of the Church
Father when he writes that the Sacred
Mysteries of God's Gospel could never be
“committed to writing… and expressed in
words”.
What Origen is very clearly stating in
these words have great meaning to the
modern believer in search of the
Mysteries of God today. If we are to
spiritually mature, we must recognize
the fact that what we read literally --
i.e., with our physical eyes and natural
perception and understanding -- in our
Bibles today, is not the Gospel of God,
but rather, the doctrine intended for
the masses of people who dwell outside
the house or Kingdom. Open your Bibles
and see for yourself. Nowhere in the
New Testament scriptures does it suggest
that what is written is representative
of what the Bible states is the
Mysteries that was revealed to those who
were with the Lord
“in the
house”!
If
we are to embrace the higher knowledge
that we pray for, it is important that
we comprehend that in a Spiritual
Church, there would not be any reason to
attempt to teach Sacred Truths that
carnal words and understanding cannot
describe or fathom. In a Spiritual
Church, the only thing necessary to
teach is how to enter and open the front
door. Once in, God Himself will teach
the disciple all things. This great
truth is expressed in the Gospel of John
in the words:
“It is written in the Prophets:
'They will all be taught by God.'
Everyone who listens to the Father and
learns from him comes to me”
(John 6:45 NIV). Thus, the Gospel of
God is never taught or written in words
that men can perceive with carnal eyes
or understanding -- but rather, only the
instruction on how -- or The Way -- to
embrace the Higher Spiritual Knowledge.
Origen then uses the writings of John as
an example and writes:
“And once
more, John, in teaching us the
difference between what ought to be
committed to writing and what not,
declares that he heard seven thunders
instructing him on certain matters, and
forbidding him to commit their words to
writing”. The passage of
scripture that Origen is referring to
is: “And I saw another strong
angel coming down out of heaven, clothed
with a cloud; and the rainbow was upon
his head, and his face was like the sun,
and his feet like pillars of fire; and
he had in his hand a little book which
was open. And he placed his right foot
on the sea and his left on the land; and
he cried out with a loud voice, as when
a lion roars; and when he had cried out,
the seven peals of thunder uttered their
voices. And when the seven peals of
thunder had spoken, I was about to
write; and I heard a voice from heaven
saying, 'Seal up the things which the
seven peals of thunder have spoken, and
do not write them’”
(Rev 10:1-4 NAS).
What is it that John is conveying to
us? Very clearly he is warning the
reader that his writings are sealed --
sealed because the Sacred Truths are not
written literally, but with the garb of
Gnostic symbolism -- and that only the
disciples of the Light can grasp their
true meaning. That we do not have the
slightest idea as to the true spiritual
meaning of the Book of Revelations is
demonstrated in the fact that every
generation of church prophets has used
this writing to prove they were living
in the
“end times”, and all
have been proved to be in error.
What does this term sealed mean? In
the words of the prophet Isaiah:
“And the
vision of all is become unto you as the
words of a book that is sealed, which
men deliver to one that is learned,
saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he
saith, I cannot; for it is sealed: And
the book is delivered to him that is not
learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee:
and he saith, I am not learned.
Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as
this people draw near me with their
mouth, and with their lips do honor me,
but have removed their heart far from
me, and their fear toward me is taught
by the precept of men”
(Isa 29:11-13 KJV). The one who is
learned cannot read it because he cannot
betray the Mysteries of God to those who
are
“outside” the house.
While the one who is not learned cannot
read it because he lacks the spiritual
eyes to see beyond the facade of the
exoteric doctrine that is contained in
the literal understanding of the
narrative.
It
is impostor Jews such as the scribes and
Pharisees who attempt to read the
scriptures in accordance with what
Isaiah calls “the precept of
men”, that Jesus condemned.
Thus, it is these people whom the Lord
spoke of when he said that they
“draw near
me with their mouth, and with their lips
do honor me, but have removed their
heart far from me”.
Why? It is only through the
consecrated physical body, the purified
heart, and the enlightened (Anointed)
mind that the disciple enters into the
Spiritual Temple.
In
self-examination, this same condition
that Jesus condemned is prevalent in the
modern Church today. The people who
have very little knowledge of the Bible
depend upon others to teach them. This
is both good and bad. It is good that
the people gain a greater understanding
of the scriptures -- it is not good that
they learn the doctrine of the sect, and
then they study the scriptures to
confirm
“the precepts of men”
which they have been taught. When they
do this, they unknowingly remove their
heart farther from the Lord, and cut
themselves off from the Source of True
Knowledge. Moreover, because they
possess a carnal perception of God, when
they pray, they do not pray to the Lord,
but rather they prey to the god of their
precepts and dogma. And in the same
way, when they call upon the name of the
Lord, they often call upon the lord of
their own creation.
The
scriptures are spiritual writings that
are sealed -- which means that only
those who have matured spiritually, and
have been given the spiritual eyes to
see the true meaning of the scriptures
-- those who are able to look within and
beyond the seal -- will grasp the
essence of the Word. Why? Because
the objective of New Covenant teachings
is not to instruct men about the Kingdom
-- but rather, to teach them the means
to enter the Kingdom. In view of the
fact that our pre-existent soul already
consciously dwells in a heavenly realm
that is parallel to this physical world
in which we live, the initial knowledge
that we need is already manifest within
us.
What the Bible states is that the
Mysteries of the Kingdom and the Gospel
of God do not belong to the carnal and
profane, and this is seen in the command
of the Lord:
“Do not give dogs what is sacred;
do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you
do, they may trample them under their
feet, and then turn and tear you to
pieces” (Matt 7:6
NIV).
Under the heading of Dog, the
International Standard Bible
Encyclopedia for this verse it
reads:
“Other passages express by inference the
low esteem in which dogs are held.
Nothing worse could happen to a person
than that his body should be devoured by
dogs (1 Kin 14:11; 16:4; 21:19,23,
etc.). Job 30:1 says of the youth who
deride him that he disdained to set
their fathers with the dogs of his
flock. In Phil 3:2 and Rev 22:15, dogs
are coupled with evil-workers,
sorcerers, etc”.
With
regard to this verse the
Adam Clark
Commentary writes that the members
of this sentence should be transposed
thus:
Give not that
which is holy unto the dogs,
Lest they turn again and
rend you:
Neither cast
ye your pearls before swine,
Lest they
trample them under their feet.
The commentary then goes on to explain
the meaning:
“As a general meaning of this
passage, we may just say: The sacrament
of the Lord's supper, and other holy
ordinances which are only instituted for
the genuine followers of Christ, are not
to be dispensed to those who are
continually returning like the snarling
ill-natured dog to their easily
predominant sins of rash judgment,
barking at and tearing the characters of
others by evil speaking, back biting and
slandering; nor to him who, like the
swine, is frequently returning to wallow
in the mud of sensual gratifications and
impurities?”
Speaking of those Christians who again
turn to the things of this world after
beginning to embrace the gospel of
Christ, the Apostle Peter makes
reference to the scriptures and states:
“But it
is happened unto them according to the
true proverb, The dog is turned to his
own vomit again; and the sow that was
washed to her wallowing in the mire”
(2 Pet 2:22 KJV).
We
must come to terms with the reality
today that Jesus was not
all-inclusive. It is clearly seen in
the Bible that Jesus commanded his
disciples not to reveal even the
elementary precepts of the Gospel of God
to those people who can be likened to
dogs and swine -- even when they profess
with their mouths their allegiance to
the Lord. If they were true believers,
then they would know the Mysteries first
hand. For this reason the Sacred
Secrets that bring the believer to
maturity, are simply not written where
the carnal and unworthy can view them.
This is confirmed in the words of
Clement, the 1st century disciple of
Peter, who wrote:
“We remember
that our Lord and teacher, as
commanding, said to us, guard the
mysteries for me, and the sons of my
house. Wherefore also he explained to
his disciples, privately, the mysteries
of the kingdoms of the heavens.”
(Clementine Homilies).
What is important is for us to realize
that Jesus taught two gospels -- the
good news or gospel of Jesus that was
proclaimed to the masses, and the Gospel
of God, which were the Mysteries of the
Kingdom that was taught only to his
disciples. This is seen expressly in
the words of Clement when said regarding
the commandment of the Lord that the
disciples must
“guard the
mysteries for me, and the sons of my
house”. Those who
are in the house, are the disciples who
have gained entrance into the Spiritual
Kingdom that he declared. While those
who were said to be “outside”,
or sense bound in this world, received
only the good news announcing the
existence of the Spiritual Kingdom that
they must seek with a purified body and
mind.
From
a New Covenant perspective, knowledge
that is conveyed in the manner of
instruction must be understood to be the
elementary teachings which assist us in
our endeavor to prepare ourselves --
road markers that we will perceive as we
travel -- changes in consciousness that
we will observe -- and the route that we
must follow in our journey into the
Kingdom. The whole concept of the
coming of the Kingdom is not from the
perspective that a physical kingdom will
be inaugurated in this world -- but
rather, that the divide between the
inner Kingdom (Lk 17:21) will be
bridged, and we will then exist in both
realms simultaneously. Thus, herein
lies the problem once it is understood
that we already consciously exist in
both worlds, and it is this division
that divides us that Jesus said we must
strive and work to overcome. When the
Bible states that we must pick up our
own cross and walk in The Way, what it
is conveying is the need to purify the
body and expand the mind in preparation
for the Kingdom to come within the
consciousness that we are using in this
realm.
With regard to the spiritual term
“house”,
Origen wrote:
“I have not yet spoken of the
observances of all that is written in
the gospel, each one of which contains
much doctrine difficult to be
understood, not merely by the multitude,
but even by certain of the more
intelligent, including a very profound
explanation of the parables, which Jesus
delivered to ‘those without' while
reserving the exhibition of their full
meaning for those who have passed beyond
the stage of exoteric teachings, and who
came to him privately in the house. And
when he comes to understand it, he will
admire the reason why some are said to
be without, and others in the house”.
This same understanding is explained in
the scriptures when it states that one
should
“Speak not in the ears of a fool: for he
will despise the wisdom of thy words”
(Prov 23:9 KJV). In the words of
Origen, the true meaning of the parables
and the scriptures belongs only to
“those who
have passed beyond the stage of exoteric
teachings, and who came to him privately
in the house”.
What, then, is exoteric teachings?
Paul calls it the
“milk of the
Gospel”
designed for
the nourishment of immature believers
who he calls “babes in Christ”
(1 Cor 3:1-2). These entry-level
teachings have to do with the cleansing
and purification of the mind and body
from the defilements of this realm
because
“Nothing impure will ever enter it, nor
will anyone who does what is shameful or
deceitful” (Rev 21:27
NIV). In our assessment of these
statements, we must understand that
spiritual wisdom and understanding is
not derived from the memorization of
manmade concepts -- but rather, it is
the result of our endeavor to utilize a
greater potential of our mind.
The second century Church Father Clement
of Alexandria expressed this same
message when he wrote that:
“For the
prophet saith: Who shall understand a
parable of the Lord save he that is wise
and knowledgeable and loveth his Lord?
For it is given to few to contain all
things: For it is not as grudging that
the Lord commanded in a certain Gospel:
‘My secret mystery for me and for the
sons of mine house’”
(Clement of Alexandria, Strom.
V.10.63).
Dogs
and swine are symbols -- symbols of
those who claim to be believers, and yet
they attempt to alternate their lives
between the gospel and the things of
this world. Regardless of what these
people profess with their lips, they do
not love the Lord. Therefore, only the
disciple, the one who has put the
doctrines of men and the slavery to
materialism and the culture of this
world behind him, and has entered within
the house, can receive the true Gospel
and Mysteries of God.
In
his famed work De Principiis, Origin
explains who can be a recipient of the
Mysteries of the Kingdom and the Gospel
of God:
“Whoever has clean hands, and therefore
lifts up holy hands to God… let him come
to us… Whoever is pure, not only from
all defilement, but from what are
regarded as lesser transgressions, let
him be boldly initiated into the
mysteries of Jesus, which properly are
made known only to the holy and the
pure… To those who have been purified in
heart, he whose soul has for a long
time, been conscious of no evil,
especially since he yielded himself to
the healing of the Word, let such a one
hear the doctrines which were spoken in
private by Jesus to his genuine
disciples”.
The dogs and swine who attempt to live
an alternating lifestyle -- clinging to
this world while attempting to
half-heartedly embrace the gospel of
Jesus, cannot
“lift up holy hands to God”.
Having never become cognizant of the
spiritual essence within them -- an
essence that lies beyond the great
divide of heaven and earth -- they
remain sense bound, and cannot refrain
from sin. They therefore never become
“pure…
from all defilement”,
even from what are
“regarded as
lesser transgressions”.
Because they do not possess the
spiritual power and strength that
cleanses them from the defilements of
the carnal world, they make excuses for
their unholy condition, and create dogma
explaining why man cannot be perfect and
sinless. Because the believers who
know only the exoteric doctrine of the
Christ continue to cling to this world,
and have never been purified by the
healing of the Word, they continue to
dwell in what we call sin. Having
never been purified, they do not possess
the knowledge of those who were
“…initiated
into the mysteries of Jesus, which
properly are made known only to the holy
and the pure”.
Therefore, they never come to
“hear the
doctrines which were spoken in private
by Jesus to his genuine disciples”.
It
makes no difference what they call
themselves; i.e., Christian or Jew,
minister or rabbi, priest, bishop,
prophet, etc., they cannot be called
Jesus'
“genuine disciples” until
they have been “purified in
heart… for a long time, been conscious
of no evil, especially since he yielded
himself to the healing of the Word”.
Because they remain
“outside”,
they do not even know or understand the
essence of what Jesus truly taught.
They may preach the good news, and
appear to live a religious lifestyle,
but they are not very much different
than the scribes and Pharisees that
Jesus condemned for exactly the same
reason. Thus, the doctrine of
perpetual redemption, and the
sanctification of a carnal lifestyle as
seen in our churches today, simply had
no place among the genuine Christians of
the first three centuries.
The Minor Mysteries:
In the Martyrdom of Ignatius
(first Century Overseer of Antioch),
Ignatius speaks of himself as a disciple
of John. In his Epistle to the
Ephesians he writes that he has been
“initiated
into the mysteries of the Gospel with
Paul, the holy, the martyred”.
In his Epistle to the Trallaus he speaks
of the mysteries and writes:
“Might I not
write to you things more full of
mystery? But I fear to do so, lest I
should inflict injury on you who are
babes. Pardon me in this respect, lest,
as not being able to receive their
weighty import, ye should be strangled
by them”. Ignatius
also writes that though he is aware of
the mysteries, he is not yet
“by any means perfect, nor am I such a
disciple as Paul or Peter”.
What preacher of the gospel today warns
his congregation that if he was to
reveal the true teachings of the New
Covenant -- the Gospel of God -- he
would
“inflict injury on you who are babes”
in Christ? What teaching of the Lord
could a present-day preacher of the
gospel reveal that the congregation of
believers are not
“able to
receive their weighty import”?
If Ignatius, either of the two Clements,
or Origen was with us today, what
profound mystery could they speak
regarding the true teachings of Jesus
that believers today would be
“strangled
by them”?
What
must be immediately recognized is that
when we speak about the Christianity of
the first three centuries, we are not
talking about the same religion that
exists today. That's right! Because
of the political agenda and doctrines
that were forced upon the church in the
fourth century, it is easily
demonstrated that the Christianity we
know today is a mere shadow of what
Jesus taught and was believed over the
first three centuries of our Common
Era. Moreover, we can never even begin
to move beyond the entry level milk, and
partake of the solid spiritual food that
enables us to embrace the Gospel of God,
until we come to terms with the fact
that the Christianity of the first three
centuries was so profoundly different
than what remains today, that what is
practiced today must be recognized as a
new religion that came into being in the
fourth century, and was revised into
still an almost totally new form at the
time of the Reformation.
We
cannot today even relate to sacred
teachings that would
“strangle”
the common believer, because we no
longer possess the Gospel of God -- and
have only the good news that was
preached to the multitudes. Because
the Church became carnal and of the
flesh, we have only preserved the
doctrine that Origen spoke of as
“preached in
the Churches… for the simpleminded and
for the ears of the common crowd who are
led on to live better lives by their
belief”. I
understand that these words of Origen
will be viewed as being objectionable by
many believers today! Is the words of
Origen any different that the Word of
God where it is written:
"Wisdom
calls aloud in the street, she raises
her voice in the public squares; at the
head of the noisy streets she cries out,
in the gateways of the city she makes
her speech: "How long will you simple
ones love your simple ways? How long
will mockers delight in mockery and
fools hate knowledge? If you had
responded to my rebuke, I would have
poured out my heart to you and made my
thoughts known to you. But since you
rejected me when I called and no one
gave heed when I stretched out my hand,
since you ignored all my advice and
would not accept my rebuke, I in turn
will laugh at your disaster; I will mock
when calamity overtakes you--when
calamity overtakes you like a storm,
when disaster sweeps over you like a
whirlwind, when distress and trouble
overwhelm you. "Then they will call to
me but I will not answer; they will look
for me but will not find me. Since they
hated knowledge and did not choose to
fear the LORD, since they would not
accept my advice and spurned my rebuke,
they will eat the fruit of their ways
and be filled with the fruit of their
schemes. For the waywardness of the
simple will kill them, and the
complacency of fools will destroy them;
but whoever listens to me will live in
safety and be at ease, without fear of
harm" (Prov 1:20-33
NIV).
For
those of you who judge men such as
Origen for being blunt, and not
politically correct, wait until you meet
the Judge of all mankind!
There is no way that the people of the
simple faith are able to perceive and
understand the Mysteries of God. If
the modern Christian rejects what is
called the minor mysteries -- i.e., such
things as the doctrine of transmigration
(reincarnation) -- how are they able to
embrace the more profound Mysteries?
When Celsus attacked the Church for
teaching the masses one doctrine, while
teaching the spiritual elect of the
Church a secret doctrine, we cannot even
relate to Origen's answer when we wrote:
“It is
good to keep secret the entrance of
souls into bodies”,
but “not… the transmigration from one
body into another”. If we,
in our present day, continue to cling to
the religious concepts of the Emperor
Justinian, and view the doctrine of
transmigration (reincarnation) as heresy
-- a teaching that was considered only a
minor mystery -- how could we ever come
to understand what Origen refers to as
the
“secret [of] the entrance of souls into
bodies”? We
cannot! And neither can we progress
any further as Christians in our desire
to draw nearer to Christ!
It
is important for us to understanding the
far-reaching reality that is being
presented to us: From the perspective of
the more profound mysteries, if we
cannot come to understand the reason for
“the
entrance of souls into bodies”,
then neither can we ever get a right
sense of the eventual destiny of
mankind. Without knowing why we came
into this realm, or what we must
accomplish in order to complete our
journey into this life, we become a
people without direction -- perpetually
lost in what is known as the
“wheel of
rebirth” -- ever
remaining a slave to the ruler of this
world.
If
we are to begin to comprehend the depth
of the great truths that Jesus taught,
the modern believer must realize that
Ignatius could very well have been
speaking about Christians today when he
wrote: “Might I
not write to you things more full of
mystery? But I fear to do so, lest I
should inflict injury on you who are
babes. Pardon me in this respect, lest,
as not being able to receive their
weighty import, ye should be strangled
by them”. Today -- because
we are imbued with an anti-Gnostic
Darwinist mindset -- we have become so
alienated from the reality of our
indwelling pre-existent soul that we
have a real serious problem in
attempting to comprehend how a Christian
could even believe in reincarnation.
Yet, we can plainly see that Origen did
not even consider the belief in
reincarnation to be any big deal, and
was much more concerned with keeping
“secret the
entrance of souls into bodies”.
When the early Church Fathers wrote
about the Mysteries of God, they did not
even consider reincarnation to be
included in the teachings that should
not be discussed or revealed openly.
Moreover, neither was the belief in
reincarnation even considered in the
same league with those spiritual
concepts that would
“inflict
injury on you who are babes”.
The Christian concept of reincarnation
was never at any time considered to be
anything more than one of the
“minor mysteries” that must
be embraced as a gateway doctrine that
brings the disciple to a proper
understanding of life, in order to open
their mind to the spiritual mysteries
that could not be spoken about openly to
believers who were not prepared to
comprehend man's true spiritual
nature. In truth, the doctrine of
reincarnation, or the transmigration of
the soul, belonged more to the Mosaic
Law that controlled the carnally minded
people of this world, than to the
spiritually minded Christian who
embraced the higher reality of the Word.
In
the words of Clement of Alexandria in
his Stromata:
“The Lord… allowed us to
communicate those Divine Mysteries, and
of that holy light, to those who are
able to receive them. He did not
certainly disclose to the many what did
not belong to the many; but to the few
to whom He knew that they belonged, who
were capable of receiving and being
molded according to them. But Secret
things are entrusted to speech, not to
writing as in the case with God. And if
one says that it is written, 'there is
nothing secret which shall not be
revealed, nor hidden which shall not be
disclosed', let him also hear from us,
that to him who hears secretly, even
what is secret shall be manifested.
This is what is predicted by this
oracle. And to him who is able secretly
to observe what is delivered to him,
that which is veiled shall be disclosed
as truth; and what is hidden to the many
shall appear manifest to the few”.
The great truth that Clement writes is
almost totally devoid from the
understanding of the modern Christian.
In fact, the modern believer does not
even possess any comprehension with
respect to the basis of what is called
the oral teachings. When Clement
states that the Mysteries of God are
never written -- but rather, only spoken
between teacher and disciple -- the
ultimate meaning of this great truth is
only comprehended when one arrives at
the level where they realize that the
true oral teaching is that which is
whispered in the ear when a consecrated
disciple is able to come into the
presence of the True Prophet -- i.e.,
the indwelling Son of God. The problem
is that it is impossible for carnal man
who possesses no perception of anything
beyond his very limited sensual and
material reality, to even envision the
spiritual realms that lie just beyond
this three-dimensional world. Thus,
the result is that man in his natural
organic state of mind always perceives
the essence of the spiritual teachings
of Jesus in the exact misunderstanding
as was observed and predicted by the
Apostle Paul when he wrote:
“But the
natural man receiveth not the things of
the Spirit of God: for they are
foolishness unto him: neither can he
know them, because they are spiritually
discerned” (1 Cor 2:14
KJV).
Because it is impossible for the man of
a natural mind to even begin to
comprehend the Mysteries of Life, God
and Creation, those who are entrusted
with this sacred knowledge must of
necessity, not reveal to carnal man more
than he is able to understand. This is
why Ignatius wrote:
“Might I not
write to you things more full of
mystery? But I fear to do so, lest I
should inflict injury on you who are
babes. Pardon me in this respect, lest,
as not being able to receive their
weighty import, ye should be strangled
by them”. To what extent
was the secret doctrine, or spiritual
teachings of Jesus concealed from the
masses who were said to be
“outside” the house, can be
seen where Clement of Alexandria openly
writes that many times the true, or
Gnostic Christian, must lie, in order to
protect the babes in Christ who would be
stumbled by the revelation of more solid
spiritual food. In his Stromata, he
writes:
“Whatever, therefore, he has in his
mind, he bears on his tongue, to those
who are worthy to hear, speaking as well
as living from assent and inclination.
For he both thinks and speaks the truth;
unless at any time, medicinally, as a
physician for the safety of the sick, he
may deceive or tell an untruth…”
(Book 7, Chap 9).
What Clement is stating is that if you
believe wholeheartedly in the good news,
and have not gone beyond the
“milk” or exoteric doctrine
of the Christ, then you are believing
forms and symbols that could be
considered
“untruths”.
Why? Because like the Law of the Jews,
these literal doctrines are forms and
types that conceal deeper mysteries of
the spirit. Why is a baby is not given
solid food? Because he is not mature
enough to consume it. In like manner,
neither is an infant and young child
shown explicit sex acts. Why? For
the same reason that Origen wrote that
the exoteric doctrine which the Apostle
Paul refers to as the
“milk”,
is “…preached in the Churches…
for the simpleminded and for the ears of
the common crowd who are led on to live
better lives by their belief”.
Carnal man who uses less than ten
percent of his potential of mind, and
whose perception of life is totally
focused in this very limited physical
reality, is only capable of embracing
forms and symbols that convey to him
deeper spiritual truths that he is not
yet able to comprehend the true depth
of. Why? Because carnal man does not
yet possess the necessary maturity to
perceive or comprehend anything beyond
his very limited physical reality. Why
isn't a college level curriculum given
to elementary school students? The
problem goes far beyond the
intellectual: Not only is there a great
number of concepts that a child is
simply not prepared to understand, but
because they lack the necessary level of
development of mind, neither do they
possess the attention span and
intellectual focus to even begin to
learn at a college level. Their level
of physical development simply does not
support the aptitude necessary to
comprehend the more advanced concepts
that require a much higher state of
maturity.
The genuine religious experience can
very much be likened to the physical and
intellectual nourishment of a child.
In view of these early Christian
writings, what does the Bible say:
“Whom shall
he teach knowledge?” and
“whom shall he make to understand
doctrine?” Is the
question that is being posed?
“Them that
are weaned from the milk, and drawn from
the breasts. For precept must be upon
precept, precept upon precept; line upon
line, line upon line; here a little, and
there a little” (Isa
28:9-10KJV).
What is it that the scriptures are
conveying to us? Spiritual precepts
are revealed to the believer
“line upon line, here a little, and
there a little”, until the
babes in Christ are prepared to move on
to maturity. The reason we fail in our
present day to comprehend this great
spiritual truth, is because we no longer
even understand the process of spiritual
development. And what is this
process? Where today, in modern
Christian doctrine, is the teaching
that:
“The soul has neither beginning nor end…
Every soul… comes into this world
strengthened by the victories or
weakened by the defeats of its previous
life” (Origen, De
Principiis). In our very limited view
of reality, we embrace the concepts of a
Darwinist theology -- and because we are
unable to observe the process of the
perfection of the soul, we fail to grasp
the means by which we will one day
arrive at the cross of our own
resurrection. Because we read our
scriptures as a history book, in the
same manner as the Sadducees and
Pharisees, we never move beyond what the
Apostle calls the milk of the gospel.
In
the writings of the early church,
sinners are spoken of as being sick --
and as people who are afflicted with a
disease, they must be given the
appropriate medicine in order to be
restored to a spiritually healthful
state of perfection. It is clearly
written in both the scriptures, as well
as the writings of the early Church
Fathers, that this purification must be
accomplished before the sinner can
comprehend the true teachings of Jesus,
enter into the Kingdom, and receive the
Mysteries of God and Creation. The
medicine for the carnal believer whose
mind is controlled and attached to the
material and sensual things of this
world, is the
“milk of the Gospel”
-- and as this medicine begins to mold
the life of the believer, the
appropriate medicine that is then
dispensed is called the
“lesser mysteries” -- which
mysteries have been veiled within the
parables and the historical narrative of
the scriptures.
The Spiritual Embryo:
The problem is not that the authors of
our scriptures wished to hide sacred
truths from the reader. Neither Jesus,
his follower, nor the early church
desired to conceal anything from
anyone. The problem is congenital --
our mind is embryonic -- and this
embryonic state only permits us to use a
very small part of our potential of
mind. If we are to comprehend the
realms of Creation beyond the three
dimensional limits of this physical
world, then we must begin use those
parts of our mind that correspond to
these other realms. In our natural
state we are unable to perceive and
comprehend the Mysteries of God because
the part of the mind that we are
presently using corresponds to this
world. If we desire to see and
understand more of reality, then we must
learn to activate those parts of the
mind that relates to those extended
dimensions of being. The problem is
that because our physical bodies are
made up and comprised of earthly matter,
in its natural organic state it does not
readily support the perception and
comprehension of man’s reality beyond
his present existence.
In
our modern-day study of the differences
between the sexes, one of the paramount
things we have learned is that men and
women use different parts of the brain
to evaluate and respond to the same
stimulation. In understanding this
scientifically proven fact, it should
then be reasonable for us to comprehend
that because we have never made any
attempt to gaze beyond the three
dimensions of this world, that part of
the mind which we would have to use, is
lying dormant and inactive. That we
attempt to explain the Mysteries of God
from the perception of the part of the
mind that relates to this world, instead
of utilizing that part of our mind that
corresponds to our indwelling soul and
spiritual natures, is the fundamental
reason why carnal man is unable to
comprehend the Spiritual Gospel of
God.
In
the same way that an elementary school
student embraces each concept in its
proper order until his thinking begins
to mature and develop the power of
higher reasoning, as the believer
evolves -- line upon line, precept upon
precept -- toward perfection and
spiritual regeneration, these
“lesser mysteries” become
revealed to them as the veil of the
scriptures becomes slowly removed with
the development of spiritual eyes and
spiritual ears in their quest for the
deeper Knowledge. Why are they able to
see and comprehend more than the natural
man? Because they have begun to
activate the dormant parts of their mind
that lies beyond the ten percent barrier
used by carnal man.
When
the early church authorities write about
the absolute need for the purification
from sin, what are they saying? Where
the carnal mind envisions God, an angel,
or some supernatural being, looking down
upon men deciding who will receive the
gifts of the spirit, and who is not
worthy, this is simply not the case.
Ultimately, sin is the squandering away
and loss of our vital life force as it
is consumed by the sensual and material
things of this world -- which condition
in the parable of the prodigal son is
portrayed of as the squandering away of
the son’s inheritance on riotous
living.
In
order to use our full potential of mind,
we must be able to channel the vital
life-force through our carnal nature,
and into those parts of our mind that
correspond to the other dimensions of
Creation. If, like a gambler, an
addict, or any other person who is a
slave to the things of this world, we
squander away our earnings on things of
a temporal nature, and we fail to
conserve and direct our energies into
the higher purposes and realities of
life, we will continue to remain
spiritually destitute. The true
purpose of religion, then, is to imbue
the people with a higher sense of
reality, and then teach them how to
channel their Divine Inheritance in a
positive direction -- a direction that
will make them complete, and permit them
to take their place in the vision of
man's ultimate destiny with their
Eternal Father God.
In
the biblical story of Onan, the Lord
brought destruction upon him (Gen
38:8-10) because he spilled his seed
upon the ground, rather than raise up
offspring with his brother’s widow.
The underlying message is seen in the
fact that when we fail to use our
energies for the higher purpose of
mankind, we will suffer loss, and become
spiritually dead. This is true of our
sexual energy, as well as the six other
spiritual sources of energy that are
moving within and without the body-mind.
In
a Living Religion, there is very little
emphasis placed upon historical
events. Historical events mean
absolutely nothing to the disciple,
except to comprehend what disciples have
successfully employed in previous ages
in their search for higher truth. In a
Living Religion, the focus is on gaining
entrance into the Kingdom -- Repent,
i.e.,
“open and unloose the mind”,
for the kingdom of heaven is at hand
(Matt 3:2). The objective of a Living
Religion is the return of the prodigal
son to his Father in the Kingdom.
Faith or belief without action, cannot
transport a believer beyond the natural
barrier of this realm into the
Kingdom. Historical events, therefore,
are only valid inasmuch as they are used
as examples in the life of the
present-day disciple -- examples that
must be incorporated into the life of
the disciple in their quest to open the
gate to the Kingdom. In this respect,
in the same manner that Jesus interacted
with the world, we must learn to do the
same.
From
the perception of the milk of the
Gospel, to understand these great truths
we must pose the question: Who are the
Sadducees and Pharisees today? What is
their present day doctrine? How are
the present day Sadducees and Pharisees
blocking the entrance of the modern day
believer into the kingdom? What
lessons can be learned from the past
that will assist the disciple today in
his quest to receive the Secret Doctrine
of Jesus, and enter the Kingdom? What
is the meaning of the virgin birth, as
it pertains to the birth of the disciple
into the kingdom? What is the meaning
of the Anointing of the Holy Spirit in
the form of a dove in the river
Jordan? The twelve disciples? The
temptation? The Passover, crucifixion,
and resurrection? Regardless of what
we choose to believe, each of us must
one day come to terms with these great
spiritual symbols that have been
conveyed in the writings of the New
Covenant.
What we fail to understand is that even
if these symbols are based upon actual
historical events, they profit us very
little if we are unable to use them in
our present life. The commandment of
Jesus was for his disciples to follow in
his footsteps, and not to merely believe
that historical events took place.
Christians today proclaim that they are
saved by the blood of the cross -- and
yet, they ignore the fact that Jesus
himself refutes them, as seen in the
words:
“and anyone who does not take his cross
and follow me is not worthy of me.
Whoever finds his life will lose it, and
whoever loses his life for my sake will
find it” (Matt
10:38-39 NIV). Thus, what Jesus warns
the believer is that to be saved by the
blood of the cross, one must shed their
own blood on the cross!
It is
because we no longer understand the
symbol of the cross in relation to the
purification of the body-mind, that we
can no longer transcend this world and
enter the Kingdom. Yes, we are saved
by the blood of Jesus -- but when we
ignore the very clear statement of the
scriptures that it is absolutely
necessary for our own blood to be
intermingled with his in our own
crucifixion, then there is no life in
us! Jesus never said that he came to
save those who refuse to follow. There
is nothing in the scriptures that
conveys we can remain very much attached
to the things of this world, and still
be saved. Where we view the symbols of
the New Covenant as being philosophical,
the true worship of God can only be
realized when go beyond the symbolism of
the milk, and we begin to imitate the
example and pattern of Jesus in our
daily life.
In
the words of Gregory, Bishop of Nyssa:
“…it is
imperative on all those who have an
equally earnest desire for the Good as
He has, to be followers by the path of
an exact imitation of Him Who leads the
way to salvation, and to carry into
action what He has shown them. It is, in
fact impossible for persons to reach the
same goal unless they travel by the same
ways”.
Where the carnal Christian sees these
narratives of scriptures as articles of
faith and belief in historical events,
the spiritual Christian applies them to
their own lives in their quest to be
re-born into the Kingdom. The
spiritual Christian is he who perceives
the great truth in the words of Gregory,
and knows that he must walk the
“path of an
exact imitation of Him who leads the way
to salvation, and to carry into action
what He has shown them”.
Isn’t these words written by Gregory the
exact same message contained in the
words of Jesus when he warned:
“and anyone who
does not take his cross and follow me is
not worthy of me…”?
Thus, our path into the Kingdom has been
obstructed because we no longer
comprehend the manner in which the
seemingly historical symbols pertain to
our present life. The believer seeking
to walk in The Way comes to understand
that what appears in scripture to be
historical, is actually physical, mental
and spiritual events that take place in
the life of the disciple -- and he comes
to know that he must become born of the
virgin, baptized by the Holy Spirit in
the river Jordan, raise up the twelve,
travail through the seven great cities,
experience the crucifixion of the carnal
mind in Jerusalem, and become the Son of
God who reigns forever in the Kingdom.
In
order to walk in The Way, the disciple
knows that they must be nourished by the
knowledge of what lies beyond this
three-dimensional world. In order to
transcend the physical, and truly become
a heavenly being, man must activate
those portions of his mind that are
dormant in the life of natural man, and
be able to rise to his full potential.
In his endeavor to become complete, the
disciple understands that this sacred
knowledge -- i.e., the secret teachings
of Jesus -- could only be revealed to
those deemed worthy to walk upon
consecrated ground, and enter into the
house of the Lord in the endeavor to
hear His Words of Life. Thus, the
disciple endeavors to make his physical
the consecrated ground upon which the
Master is able to enter in and teach the
Sacred Knowledge of the Kingdom and
Creation.
Because the Divine Mysteries can only be
received directly from God through man's
spiritual nature, these Sacred Secrets
were never
“disclosed to the many what did not
belong to the many”.
The Gospel of God can only be embraced
by those who are spiritually
“capable of
receiving and being molded according to
them”. Believers
today should rightly ask that if these
things are so, then why isn't the
scriptures more clear on this crucial
matter? They were, but the later Roman
Church edited out the many warnings when
they purged the scriptures of what they
deemed to be Gnostic interpolations.
Gnostic -- or Spiritual Christians --
did not acknowledge the authority of the
institutionalized church -- and so, they
were deemed to be heretics. As
heretics, they were then silenced by the
sword of Constantine -- a ruthless
despot who was declared a saint by a
very carnal church that was born in his
image.
To
the Spiritual Christian, the focus of
his religious experience was on the
process of making his body a fit vessel
for his soul and spiritual natures to
indwell and manifest in. The more fit
and pure he made his physical body, the
easier was the acquisition of spiritual
knowledge in his endeavor to know
himself -- and ultimately, come to know
God through the total unity of his being
with the Divine Presence within him.
As an example: The newly discovered
Gospel of Thomas in the Nag Hammadi
Library begins this way:
“These are
the secret words which the Living Jesus
spoke and Didymos Judas Thomas wrote.
And He said: Whoever finds the
explanation of these words will not
taste death”.
With
respect to this declaration in The
Gospel of Thomas, at first glance it
would seem to be anti-Christian for
someone to be saved merely because they
find the explanation of certain words.
It would be correct for the modern
Christian to ask where faith and belief
in Christ enters into such a pattern of
religious thought? Yet, the modern
believer comes to this false assumption
because they fail to recognize the true
foundation of the Spiritual Living
Gospel that Jesus taught. In a Living
Gospel, there is only one means to find
the explanation of the words in Thomas's
Gospel, and that is to hear them at the
feet of the Master. To those people
who are sense bound, and have no
perception of the Spiritual Kingdom,
such a concept of religious thought is
impossible.
What is written in the opening of the
Gospel of Thomas is no different than
the words of Clement when he warns the
believer that
“Secret things are entrusted to
speech, not to writing… and if one says
that it is written”,
then the true spiritual message is
concealed from the eyes of the reader.
Why? Because
“they are
foolishness to him, and he cannot
understand them, because they are
spiritually discerned”
(1 Cor 2:14 NIV).
The
carnal mind, which thinks and perceives
Creation from a very limited
three-dimensional Darwinist perspective,
in the manner of an infant, simply does
not possess the mental and spiritual
tools to comprehend man's true
reality. The problem can be likened to
the very constitution of the body
itself. When we look only at the
flesh, which is the realm of physical
appearances, we cannot perceive the
internal organs that function within the
outer form of what we see. In the same
way that we can never get a right sense
of the workings of the body by looking
only upon the form, neither can we even
begin to comprehend the workings of
Creation without looking beyond the
world of appearances, and perceiving the
vital energies and heavenly powers that
are to this world as the inner organs
are to the body in which we dwell.
In
the same way that a true healer must
possess a working knowledge of all the
bodily systems and how they impact the
functioning of the body, a spiritual
healer must possess the knowledge of the
realms beyond the physical and how they
interact with the three-dimensional form
of Creation that we observe with our
bodily senses. Like the medical
student, the disciple who has begun to
be
“molded according to”
the Word, is
“able secretly to observe what is
delivered to him, that which is veiled
shall be disclosed as truth; and what is
hidden to the many shall appear manifest
to the few”.
What Clement is stating is that in the
same way a medical student must apply
himself in the endeavor to understand
the inner workings of the body, the
disciple must in like manner apply
himself to comprehend the inner workings
of the mind and spirit of man -- and
especially how the laws of Creation
impact the lives of the individual.
When reading the scriptures, the masses
who are
“outside” of the
house, and perceive only the physical
form, will see only the gospel of Jesus
-- which is an invitation -- the good
news, intended to call the lost sheep
into the Kingdom. Clement says that
the true meaning of the scriptures are
“veiled”,
and cannot be seen by the carnal mind.
It does not matter that those on the
outside proclaim that they are baptized,
committed, and claim to be reborn
believers -- so long as they abide
outside of the house, they remain
strangers therein. What the Apostle
and all early Christian authorities
proclaim, is that the babe in Christ can
no more comprehend the Living Gospel,
than the child in elementary school
could comprehend modern physics.
In order for us to follow in the
footsteps of Jesus, we must desire to
learn, grow, and embrace new dimensions
of thinking. When Edmund Wilson, an
expert who worked on the Dead Sea
Scrolls asked the question as to what
difference it makes if
“Jesus… had
been trained in the discipline and
imbued with the thought of a certain
Jewish sect, and that he had learned
from it the role that he afterwards
lived…” (The Scrolls
From The Dead Sea), in view of the fact
that the Jewish sect was very Gnostic,
it makes all the difference in the
world. When Clement admits that the
true gospel is “veiled”,
he is confirming not only the existence
of a higher knowledge that Jesus taught
only to those who were willing to learn
and be molded by that sacred knowledge,
but also the Gnostic element and nature
of our scriptures was also confirmed.
In this respect, only a Gnostic -- or
Spiritual Christian who has received the
knowledge of the Kingdom directly from
God -- can understand the true meaning
of the scriptures, which are written in
a spiritual language.
With regard to the masses, or the people
who are
“outside” the house --
the people whose hearts are blinded to
the true meaning of the Word -- Origen
writes that:
“But if some continue indolent,
and do not train themselves so as to
attend to the reading of the word, and
'to search the Scriptures,' and,
agreeably to the command of Jesus, to
investigate the meaning of the sacred
writings, and to ask of God concerning
them, and to keep 'knocking' at what may
be closed within them, the Scriptures is
not on that account to be regarded as
devoid of wisdom”.
Throughout our present-day Bibles there
are numerous passages which warn the
reader that the spiritual meaning and
sense of the message is veiled beneath
the allegorical nature of the
writings. For the most part,
Christians today simply ignore these
many warnings. Origen states that the
believer of the simple faith does not
begin the process of unveiling the
spiritual meaning of the Bible, because
he chooses to ignore these many
warnings. In recognition of this fact,
Origen defends the Bible by stating that
this indolent effort by the people of
the simple faith is not the fault of the
scriptures. In the first instance, we
must understand why they are indolent.
In order to understand this, we must ask
what their religious objective is?
Fundamentally they remain spiritually
indolent because they cling to the
doctrines of men and the things of this
world, and close their hearts and minds
to the inner voice of the Spirit.
When the Church Father speaks of those
who
“continue indolent”,
which basically means to remain as they
were when they were introduced to the
gospel, he was speaking of those
believers who have not become disciples,
and know only the exoteric milk of the
doctrine of Christ. With regard to the
spiritual meaning of the scriptures --
the meaning that is revealed only to the
disciple who seeks the gnosis -- Origen
says that they must
“investigate
the meaning of the sacred writings, and
to ask of God concerning them”.
Again we see the thought that spiritual
knowledge can only be learned directly
from God.
With regard to the inner mystical door
to the Kingdom that must be opened,
Origen states that they should
“keep
'knocking' at what may be closed within
them”. It is of
great importance for us to understand
that true religion is a process that
must be embraced daily as it begins to
mold and encompass every aspect of our
lives. God can only speak to us in
accordance with our own spiritual needs
and condition. In the manner of an
elementary school student, each level of
instruction takes the concepts of life
that we already possess to new
heights. Which means that everything
we know must remain in a state of flux
-- whereby, everything we think we know
is continually being grown and evolved
to even higher levels of understanding.
The
majority of church authorities today
will automatically reject everything
that is being presented here. Why?
Because they do not desire change -- but
rather, they want everything in life to
remain status-quo. They are successful
in their shepherding of the flock of
believers. Thus, because they are full
of the old wine (Lk 5:39), they desire
nothing more than superficial
philosophical changes in order to
continue their attachments to the
traditions and temporal things of this
world. They therefore adopt religious
doctrines that permit them the license
to live their life in pursuit of carnal
fulfillment. How many times have we
heard a televangelist preach that
Christians should have it all -- i.e.,
wealth, luxury, affluence -- and what is
especially needed is sufficient wealth
that enables the listeners to make
rather large contributions to the
ministry of the televangelist.
Spiritually, these people are
children. In the same way that our
modern educational systems are age
appropriate, so too is God's system of
spiritual development -- the difference
being that age from a spiritual
perspective is in relationship to the
soul’s individual achievement. In the
case of the simple believer, they are
not yet ready to move beyond the
temporal things of this world. They
therefore live out their lives under the
dominion of a limited curriculum, and
perceive only a very small revelation of
the Word as contained in the Bible.
Something that is easily observed
throughout all of humanity is the fact
that it is natural for people to move in
groups -- all groups of people have
their leaders -- and leaders retain
their position of authority either by
force, or because they say what the
group wants to hear. Successful
leaders learn to speak to the people’s
imagination. In the case of religion,
these leaders convince the people that
they are the chosen people -- and they
will inherit the good, while those who
oppose the doctrines of the leader or
group will meet with destruction. From
a spiritual perspective, this causes
stagnation -- as was the case with the
Jewish sects of the Sadducees and
Pharisees that Jesus condemned. The
result is that these groups squander
their opportunity of life, so limiting
themselves with their doctrines of
belief, that they never perceive either
their own spiritual nature, or the inner
mind and spirit of the scriptures.
In
his Stromata, Clement of Alexandria
writes:
“now that the Savior has taught the
Apostles, the unwritten rendering of the
written, this has been handed down also
to us”. What Clement
is stating is that it was Jesus who
revealed to his disciples the inner soul
and spirit of the scriptures.
Moreover, once we begin to understand
that the Bible is not an account of
historical events -- but rather,
spiritual events -- then the Son of God
will be able to open our own minds to
the soul and spirit of the written word
of the scriptures. This, in
acknowledgement of this fact, Clement
then explains that:
“the
mysteries are delivered mystically, that
what is spoken may be in the mouth of
the speaker; rather not in the voice,
but in his understanding”.
In
his search for Truth and Meaning, the
path that leads to a higher
understanding of the mysteries of life
that Clement makes reference to -- but
because man does not endeavor to
properly prepare the physical body and
mind to embrace spiritual reality, he
continually rejects the higher path of
knowledge perpetually confronts man.
To overcome this stagnation, the
scriptures are themselves designed to
impede the literal perception of the
written word -- and the more one reads
and studies the Bible, the more
difficult it is to believe the written
word. On this very issue, Origen is
quoted pertaining to this biblical fact
in the Encyclopedia of Religion and
Ethics:
“Scripture contains an
unhistorical element in-woven with the
history, in order that the worthlessness
of the latter may drive us to seek the
spiritual meaning”.
What does this mean?
“Scripture
contains an unhistorical element
in-woven with the history”
-- or, there exists events reported in
what, on the surface appears to be
history, that never actually happened.
Why? Why would the scriptures contain
events that never physically happened?
In answer to this question Origen
writes:
“in order that the worthlessness of the
latter may drive us to seek the
spiritual meaning”.
What Origen is stating is that to read
the scriptures as history is an almost
worthless endeavor! Why? Because
what happened during historical events
of the past cannot save you -- you can
only be saved by entering within the
Kingdom and becoming a disciple of the
Living Christ. Yet Christians today
not only read their scriptures solely as
history, but unceasingly argue over
their many interpretations of what
Origen labels as being worthless.
In
this respect, Christians today are
falling prey to the very trap that has
been set by the literal word of the
scriptures. In the Clementine Homilies
the Apostle Peter is found explaining
the nature of scripture to his disciple
Clement:
“…consider with me that if any one,
as he pleases, form a dogma agreeable to
himself, and then carefully search the
Scriptures, he will be able to produce
many testimonies from them in favor of
the dogma that he has formed”.
In considering this, Clement then asks
Peter:
“How, then, can confidence be placed in
them against God, when what every man
wishes is found in them?”
What Peter is stating is this great
truth: All the many conflicting opinions
that all the sects of Christianity have
argued about throughout all of Christian
history, are the product of the design
of the scriptures themselves. As Peter
warns, “if
anyone form a dogma, …and then carefully
search the Scriptures, he will be able
to produce many testimonies from them in
favor of the dogma”. In
other words, no matter what you choose
to believe, you will find in the
scriptures conformation of your
beliefs. Why, we ask, would the Bible
be written in such a convoluted
manner? It would appear rational to us
to reasonably assert: Why not compose
the scriptures so they make perfect
sense to the reader? The answer can
only be realized when we begin to
comprehend the true problem. If the
scriptures were composed in such a
manner so they made perfect sense, then
it would be to the carnal mind that the
body of the text would make sense to.
The purpose of the scriptures is to
awaken the dormant part of the mind that
corresponds to man's soul and spiritual
nature -- thereby enabling the disciple
to use a greater part of his potential
of mind.
What we fail to understand is that the
scriptures themselves are written from a
universal perspective. Therefore, the
exoteric doctrine -- or milk of the
scriptures -- is designed to prepare all
of mankind to walk in The Way. If each
person did not see their own personal
mindset present in the writings, then
the scriptures would be useless in their
purpose of being the means to lead all
men into the Kingdom. Clement of
Alexandria puts the whole problem into
perspective when he quotes a passage of
scripture that is no longer in our
bibles today:
“For by doing the will of God we
know the will of God”
(Stromata, Bk 1, Ch 8).
What
we must begin to grasp is that the
scriptures are created in a Divine
Pattern that is beyond our very limited
comprehension. If all men see their
own mindset and predetermined beliefs in
the scriptures, they will then find
affinity in the writings, and claim the
scriptures as their source of spiritual
truth. Having adopted the sacred
writings, they will then begin to
incorporate the Commandments of God into
their lives, permitting the scriptures
to begin the process of molding them,
resulting in the necessary preparation
required to receive the higher knowledge
of the spirit. It is by design that
the man who is a Jehovah's Witness sees
his doctrine in the scriptures -- God
wants it that way. It is by design
that the Baptist sees his -- that the
Pentecostal or Seventh Day Adventist
sees theirs -- and it is by design that
even the Atheist sees his doctrine.
Regardless of how many pamphlets the
born again Christian publishes in an
attempt to prove the doctrine of the
Trinity, the Jehovah's Witness will
continue to see their favorite passages
of scripture that affirm their position
that Jesus was not God. In like
manner, the sects that are considered
more mainstream, will continue to use
the Bible in the endeavor to prove that
the other two groups are self-imposed
fundamentalist extremists. Why?
Because these mainstream groups are not
ready to embrace the scriptures in a
more intimate manner -- having become so
attached to the philosophy and thinking
of this world, they would be incapable
of a fundamentalist perception of life
and the Bible.
The
result is that each group uses the same
book to prove the other group in
error. Why was the scriptures written
in such a way? Because the Bible is
universal -- and though each of them
embraces the Bible from a different
doctrinal perspective, when they begin
to do the will of God, they will then
begin to know the Will of God -- and in
the process of knowing and doing, the
disciple begins the journey of spiritual
transformation. How successful each
one will be in their religious quest,
will be in direct relation to how
quickly each can shed their carnal
mindset and limitations, and begin to
truly come to the Lord in word, thought
and deed.
Scriptures Written In Acceptable Customs
Of The People:
In the words of the Church Father Origen
who confirms the statement found in the
Clementine Homilies, we find his
assertion that the Word takes on a form
which is appropriate to a certain group
of people, that it might bring those
people to a spiritual level of maturity:
“If a Greek
wished by wholesome instruction to
benefit people who understood only
Egyptian or Syriac, the first thing that
he would do would be to learn their
language; and he would rather pass for a
Barbarian among the Greeks, by speaking
as the Egyptians or Syrians, in order to
be useful to them, than always remain
Greek, and be without the means of
helping them. In the same way the divine
nature, having the purpose of
instructing not only those who are
reputed to be learned in the literature
of Greece, but also the rest of mankind,
accommodated itself to the capacities of
the simple multitudes whom it addressed.
It seeks to win the attention of the
more ignorant by the use of language
which is familiar to them, so that they
may easily be induced, after their first
introduction, to strive after an
acquaintance with the deeper truths
which lie hidden in Scripture. For even
the ordinary reader of Scripture may see
that it contains many things which are
too deep to be apprehended at first; but
these are understood by such as devote
themselves to a careful study of the
divine word, and they become plain to
them in proportion to the pains and zeal
which they expend upon its
investigation” (Origen
Contra Celsum).
This
statement by Origen is of the utmost
importance if we are to begin to
comprehend the manner in which God
reveals Himself to all peoples of the
world. The scriptures are written in
the language and the culture of the
people. In order to benefit the Jews,
the Divine Nature was revealed in the
Old Testament scriptures in a manner
that would be acceptable to the Jewish
carnal mindset of the people in the
time-frame they were composed. The New
Testament, on the other hand, was
written for the people of the New
Covenant who were known as the Essenes,
Ebionites and Nazarenes. And as the
Gospel message found its way into the
hands of the Gentiles, there were then
literally hundreds of scriptures
composed from the perspective of the
Greek converts known as Christians.
When Mohammed observed that the Roman
Christian and Jewish religious worlds
had degenerated into the abyss of
secular institutional rule, he brought
the Koran into being which again
revealed the Divine Nature in a manner
that the Arab people could receive the
higher teachings.
In
many instances, these scriptures that
were published by the Gentile Christians
did not even retain a connection with
the Jewish heritage of the Gospel. Is
God Jewish? In the Old Testament the
Divine Nature that Origen makes
reference to, incorporates the language
of the people in order to develop the
people. The authors of the scriptures
were the historical Essenes who, in the
words of Origen, “would rather
pass for a Barbarian… in order to be
useful to them”. Unlike the
Sadducees and Pharisees, the Essenes did
not slaughter animals for the redemption
of sin in the temple -- neither did they
eat only certain kinds of animals,
because they were vegetarians and
embraced a spiritual lifestyle that was
free from the defilements of this
world.
When
the question is asked: Why did they
write the scriptures in the manner that
we observe in the Old Testament?
Because the carnal Jews had for a long
time sacrificed animals to the gods --
and by sacrificing only to the One God,
in the One Temple, and only sacrificing
certain animals that represented higher
symbols in the consciousness of man,
they were able to begin the process of
preparing barbarians to embrace the
teachings of The Way. Moreover, they
were successful -- i.e., the Old
Testament moral law and symbolism
incorporates concealed mysteries that
pertain to man's spiritual nature and
his relationship to God which the
average person whose mindset is imbued
with our modern culture would be unable
to even conceive of.
In
much the same manner, the Gentile
converts created scriptures that
basically performed the same function --
i.e., they made the Divine Nature
acceptable and perceptible to the people
of the Nations. I the Gentile
scriptures Jesus was severed from his
original Hebrew foundation, and became
more universal in his appeal to the mind
of the Greeks and Romans. Though these
scriptures were successful in their
purpose to transform the Greek convert
into a Spiritual Christian, they
presented another problem. Regardless
of the level of their spiritual
revelation, because they could not be
used in an historical sense, they were
later condemned by the Roman Church.
In view of the fact that the Gentile
Christians had no relationship to
Judaism, the leaders of these movements
wrote their scriptures in the language
and culture of the Gentiles, which meant
that there was little or no connection
to either the Old or New Testament
writings that we have today.
In
each case the scriptures were written in
the endeavor to reveal the Divine Nature
in a way that the people could accept.
A common thread to all the sacred
writings, though, was the fact that the
body of the scriptures contained many
points which were not historically
accurate or true. Why? Because the
Divine Nature is not Jewish, Greek,
Roman, or of any other worldly culture
-- and, like the scriptures, the body of
man is just the tip of the iceberg in
relation to the totality of his being.
Therefore, both the body of the
scriptures, as well as the body of man,
always points to -- and is dependent
upon -- a soul (realm of mind) and
spiritual nature that is not perceived
with the physical senses.
The Threefold Patten Of The Scriptures:
By Divine Providence, everything in this
world -- which is the body or physical
embodiment -- is always incomplete
without the higher spheres of mind and
spirit. In the same way that the
concept of male and female can only be
defined by their relationship to each
other, nothing in the body can be
explained without its interconnected
mental and spiritual natures.
Throughout all of life there is a Divine
Pattern: In the same way that the
organic life chain of this world begins
with the sun (spirit), the atmosphere
(mind), and the physical manifestation
of life (body), this same pattern exists
within each of us and throughout all of
Creation.
The
“correct… understanding of the
Scriptures, and the investigation of
their meaning, we consider to be of the
following kind” writes
Origen, “for we are instructed
by Scripture itself in regard to the
ideas which we ought to form of it”.
Origen then goes on to explain that:
“In the Proverbs of Solomon we
find… the following laid down,
respecting the consideration of holy
Scripture: 'And do thou,' he says,
'describe these things to thyself in a
threefold manner, in counsel and
knowledge, and that thou mayest answer
the words of truth to those who have
proposed them to thee.’”
Scripture, then, is patterned after all
of Creation, and exists in a threefold
manner -- i.e., body, mind and spirit.
Origen then goes on to state:
“Each one, then,
ought to describe in his own mind, in a
threefold manner, the understanding of
the divine letters -- that is, in order
that all the more simple individuals may
be edified, so to speak; by the very
body of Scripture; for such we term that
common and historical sense: while, if
some have commenced to make considerable
progress, and are able to see something
more (than that), they may be edified by
the very soul of Scripture. Those,
again, who are perfect, and who resemble
those of whom the apostle says, 'We
speak wisdom among them that are
perfect, but not the wisdom of this
world, nor of the princes of this world,
who will be brought to naught; but we
speak the wisdom of God, hidden in a
mystery, which God hath decreed before
the ages unto our glory’”.
What
Origen is conveying is that carnal man
sees only the (physical) body of the
scriptures -- which body instructs him
in the proper lifestyle to embrace in
order to make spiritual progress. In
our analysis we must ask the question:
Does the carnal Christian believe that
he knows the Word of God? From his
perception, everything that he believes
can be demonstrated by reading the Bible
in its literal sense. If he did not
believe it, then it could have no
lasting and beneficial effect upon
him. Therefore, it is the Will of God
that he believes -- and it is the Hand
of God upon his heart and mind that
causes him to proclaim the truth of the
Gospel that he perceives. What he
fails to comprehend, though, is that the
scriptures were designed so that he
would easily see his beliefs in the
written word. From a spiritual
perspective, what he believes about the
Mysteries of Creation that is beyond his
understanding is not important at that
point in his life. What is important,
is that he begin the process of
cleansing and moving into harmony with
the Light of the Word.
In
view of the fact that all carnal
perceptions of the scriptures are
equally very partial and incomplete,
does it really matter from the Divine
Perspective which flavor of
incompleteness he embraces? From one
perspective the answer is no -- and from
another perspective, there is a
necessary and good reason why each man
views both the Bible and life itself
from a different point of view.
The person who progresses beyond the
milk of the Gospel and becomes a
disciple in the beginning of his walk
with the Lord, seeks the soul or mind of
the scripture that he might learn
“The Way”
by which he can enter the Kingdom. And
further along the path, those who have
ceased to be of this world -- i.e.,
those who no longer live in bondage to
sin and carnal desire -- having
themselves entered the Kingdom and are
walking in “The Way”
of the Lord, are those who perceive the
spirit of the scriptures.
With this foundation laid, Origen then
explains that:
“…all such
as these may be edified by the spiritual
law itself (which has a shadow of good
things to come), as if by the Spirit.
For as man is said to consist of body,
and soul, and spirit, so also does
sacred Scripture, which has been granted
by the divine bounty for the salvation
of man”. The
scriptures are universal -- and are made
for the salvation of all men. The
carnal man sees only the historical
narrative which appears to contain the
physical laws of God -- the disciple
sees The Way -- the perfected soul sees
God and the Divine Nature that manifests
throughout all of Creation.
Origen then observes this same great
truth being conveyed in an early
Christian scripture known as the
Shepherd of Hermas, and he writes:
“Hermas is
commanded to write two little books, and
afterwards to announce to the presbyters
of the Church what he learned from the
Spirit. For these are the words that are
written: 'And you will write,' he says,
'two books; and you will give the one to
Clement, and the other to Grapte. And
let Grapte admonish the widows and
orphans, and let Clement send through
all the cities which are abroad, while
you will announce to the presbyters of
the Church.' Grapte, accordingly, who is
commanded to admonish the orphans and
widows, is the pure understanding of the
letter itself; by which those youthful
minds are admonished, who have not yet
deserved to have God as their Father,
and are on that account styled orphans.
They, again, are the widows, who have
withdrawn themselves from the unjust
man, to whom they had been united
contrary to law; but who have remained
widows, because they have not yet
advanced to the stage of being joined to
a heavenly Bridegroom. Clement,
moreover, is ordered to send into those
cities which are abroad what is written
to those individuals who already are
withdrawing from the letter -- as if the
meaning were to those souls who, being
built up by this means, have begun to
rise above the cares of the body and the
desires of the flesh; while he himself,
who had learned from the Holy Spirit, is
commanded to announce, not by letter nor
by book, but by the living voice, to the
presbyters of the Church of Christ,
i.e., to those who possess a mature
faculty of wisdom, capable of receiving
spiritual teaching”.
When James, the brother of Jesus writes
that:
“Religion that God our Father accepts as
pure and faultless is this: to look
after orphans and widows in their
distress and to keep oneself from being
polluted by the world”
(James 1:27 NIV), he is not saying that
pure religion is to look after the wives
and children of those whose father has
died. Widows and orphans are a symbol
employed in order to portray those
believers who are still carnal in
nature. It is these believers who see
only the letter -- or body -- of the
scriptures, of which Origen writes whose
“youthful minds are admonished, who have
not yet deserved to have God as their
Father, and are on that account styled
orphans”. With
regard to widows Origen writes:
“They,
again, are the widows, who have
withdrawn themselves from the unjust
man, to whom they had been united
contrary to law; but who have remained
widows, because they have not yet
advanced to the stage of being joined to
a heavenly Bridegroom”.
The unjust man is the citizen of the far
country in the parable of the prodigal
son -- i.e., the god of this world.
Thus,
widows and orphans do not represent
widows and orphans in accordance with
our understanding of these terms -- but
rather, they represent stages of
spiritual growth. Moreover, because of
our modern politically correct mindset
where the Bible is at time viewed as
sexist, in these words we must perceive
that the term widows is used with
respect to both men and women. We can
never get a right sense of either the
scriptures, or life, until we begin to
realize that all of us are reflective
with respect to our soul, and therefore
we are often rightfully portrayed in the
feminine gender.
In
the words of James: Pure religion
consecrated by the Father is for the
disciple to be of the spirit, minister
to the orphans and widows, while keeping
oneself
“unspotted from the world”
(KJV). Unspotted denotes that
condition where one has absolutely no
part of the world, with the exception of
ones manifestation as a spiritual
presence. It is these unspotted
individuals who are those who have been
reborn into the spirit, and have totally
manifested the Light of Christ in their
lives.
Widows and orphans see only the body of
the scriptures, and are yet carnal
believers who the Apostle Paul describes
as the Christians of the simple faith.
We can see the next stage of development
in Origen's words as he describes those
who are more mature:
“Clement,
moreover, is ordered to send into those
cities which are abroad what is written
to those individuals who already are
withdrawing from the letter -- as if the
meaning were to those souls who, being
built up by this means, have begun to
rise above the cares of the body and the
desires of the flesh”.
Those who are abroad are the people who
have traversed the sea of spiritual
cleansing, and have risen above the
“cares of
the body and the desires of the flesh”.
It is these men and women who have
consecrated their lives in the pursuit
of Truth, that will see the mind of the
scriptures in their quest to walk in The
Way.
With regard to the more mature in
Christ, Origen writes of Hermas:
“…while he
himself, who had learned from the Holy
Spirit, is commanded to announce, not by
letter nor by book, but by the living
voice, to the presbyters of the Church
of Christ, i.e., to those who possess a
mature faculty of wisdom, capable of
receiving spiritual teaching”.
The name Hermas means the
“messenger”
-- thus it is only the spiritual
Christians who are able to hear the
Shepherd -- or in the symbolism of the
Shepherd of Hermas, the Living voice of
Christ. Clement means merciful -- and
it is only those who are themselves
walking in The Way who receive the mercy
of the Lord. The widows and orphans --
or those believers who remain of the
flesh and see only the letter of the
scriptures and the exoteric doctrine or
good news of the Christ -- must
spiritually mature in order to have
their hearts and minds open enough to
begin to perceive the Gospel of God, and
possess the knowledge to enter the
Kingdom.
People Only See Their Own Doctrines Of
Belief In The Scriptures:
Returning once again to the writings of
Clement we can now see that Peter's
explanation should make perfect sense in
the confrontation that is to take place
with the proverbial Simon Magus:
“Therefore
Simon, who is going to discuss in public
with us tomorrow, is bold against the
monarchy of God, wishing to produce many
statements from these Scriptures, to the
effect that there are many gods, and a
certain one who is not He who made this
world, but who is superior to Him; and,
at the same time, he is going to offer
many scriptural proofs. But we also can
easily show many passages from them that
He who made the world alone is God, and
that there is none other besides Him”.
Thus, it is foretold that each side will
be able to prove their dogma with many
scriptural passages. Simon will be
able to prove that the world was created
by a false god -- and Peter will be able
to prove that the world was created by
the One God. Both will be able to use
the same scriptures to prove their
assertions. This inherent design of
scripture is by Divine Providence that
each person sees in the body of the
writings which confirm their own
beliefs.
Peter then goes on to state that:
“But if any
one shall wish to speak otherwise, he
also shall be able to produce proofs
from them at his pleasure. For the
Scriptures say all manner of things,
that no one of those who inquire
ungratefully may find the truth, but
simply what he wishes to find, the truth
being reserved…” for
the disciple who can only learn the
correct meaning of the scriptures from
the Shepherd and True Prophet.
During their discussion that was to
ensue, Simon became hostile when Peter
refused to engage in his interpretation
of the scriptures and said:
“Then said
Simon: 'You are manifestly avoiding the
hearing of the charge from the
Scriptures against your God.' Then
Peter: 'You yourself appear to me to be
doing this; for he who avoids the order
of inquiry, does not wish a true
investigation to be made. Hence I, who
proceed in an orderly manner, and wish
that the writer should first be
considered, am manifestly desirous to
walk in a straight path’”.
In
these words are noted the most profound
error of Bible readers today who only
perceive what is literally written in
the narrative of the written word.
Believers see and read the scriptures in
the manner of their doctrines, while
ignoring the very warning of the
scriptures that it is their own
perception of the Word that is in
error. Simon wants to engage Peter and
use the scriptures to prove that the
world was created by a lesser god.
Peter states that anyone can prove
almost any doctrine by using the
scriptures -- and therefore, before the
scriptures can be understood, the
“writer should first be
considered” -- meaning that
the reader must look past their own
opinions and beliefs, and perceive the
inner meaning conveyed by the writer.
That Peter's warning is correct, is
overwhelmingly proven by the modern
church. Many very intelligent minds
and astute biblical students have
studied the scriptures and continue to
hold conflicting opinions that oppose
what the next person sees very clearly
represented in the Bible. Jehovah's
Witnesses do not believe that Jesus is
God -- and they can demonstrate their
doctrine in the bible. Baptists,
Pentecostals, and most other Evangelical
Christians believe that Jesus is God,
and they have a whole host of biblical
citations to prove their doctrines.
The Mormons believe in the pre-existence
of the soul. The Quakers have no
formal doctrine, and believe only in the
revelation of the inner Light.
Presbyterians, Methodists, Lutherans,
this Orthodox, that Orthodox, this
Church of God, the Universalists, the
Reformers, the all inclusive Liberals,
the Conservatives, etc., all faithfully
read the scriptures, and all find
important points of disagreement. What
we must begin to understand is that many
of these people are very intelligent and
sincere believers -- and yet they all
see something different when they read
the scriptures. Their flaw is not in
what they see -- but like Simon, they
all failed to heed Peter's words when he
warned that the
“writer
should first be considered”
-- and if the writer is the Holy Spirit,
then it is the interpretation that this
writer teaches that is the only true
meaning.
If
what the early church authorities say is
true, and any number of doctrines and
dogma can be proven using the same
scriptures, then the reader must learn
to relinquish personal interpretation.
What, then, is the answer? The genuine
revelation of the scriptures can only be
learned from the True Prophet as to the
correct meaning of the narrative.
“Hence, O
beloved Clement”,
proclaims Peter,
“if you
would know the things pertaining to God,
you have to learn them from Him alone,
because He alone knows the truth. For if
any one else knows anything, he has
received it from Him or from His
disciples”. These
words -- that you can only learn the
things of God from Him alone -- are as
true today as when Peter spoke them to
his disciple Clement in the first
century.
|
|
The Inconceivable
Reality Of The Scriptures
Modern Christians who are in search of
the correct doctrine to believe in, are
aghast and horrified at the thought that
the Bible was purposely designed so that
anyone could prove almost any doctrine
by using the scriptures -- or that the
scriptures contain narratives that are
not historically accurate. Modern
believers will rightly ask: If what is
written in the scriptures is not a
faithful portrayal of the historical
events that transpired, then of what
value are they? This type of thinking
is carnal, and is the result of
anti-Gnostic thinking -- i.e., tell me
what to believe, so I can be on the
right side of God. The problem is that
man can never be on the right side of
God until he returns home to the
Kingdom. Belief, or faith, then, is
not part of the equation where these
things are independent of man's efforts
to walk in The Way. If you do not pick
up your own cross and follow in the
footsteps of the Lord, then you are
neither a genuine believer or a person
of sincere faith.
In
the words of Origen, those who demand
historical accuracy do not understand
the very purpose of the scriptures --
they have yet to “withdraw
themselves from the unjust man”,
and are still carnal and under the power
of this world. As believers, they are
orphans, and not yet even considered
widows. They may proclaim they are
chosen -- saved -- they may even wear
the garb of a priest, minister, rabbi,
or other clergy -- but they have yet to
begin the process of spiritual
maturity. The disciple knows that in
order to draw nearer to God, they must
possess Spiritual Truth -- and truth can
only be found in the mind and spirit of
both the scriptures and the Kingdom
within themselves.
Confirmation Of Science:
In order to demonstrate the
co-relationship between the wisdom of
the authors of our scriptures with the
findings of modern science, we can
observe this same message in the words
of Einstein when he admitted:
“We may
therefore regard matter as being
constituted by the regions of space in
which the field is extremely intense…
There is no place in this new kind of
physics both for the field and matter,
for the field is the only reality”
(quoted in M. Capek, The Philosophical
Impact of Contemporary Physics). What
both the scientist and the prophet are
conveying to us is that man must come to
terms with the fact that reality only
exists in the Kingdom -- the world in
which we presently dwell is only a
shadow of reality; and by virtue of its
incompleteness, is an illusion. The
scriptures were not written to comfort
the believer during their stay in this
world. The scriptures were not written
to confirm tradition, or to verify ones
doctrines of belief. What the
scriptures were written for was to
provide the disciples with the keys to
escape this world and enter the Kingdom
which is their source of origination.
The scriptures speak of life in our
present realm of existence as being a
state of death, because we dwell in the
world of incompleteness and illusion.
From the vision of spiritual reality: We
literally dwell in the realm of
allegorical appearances. The
scriptures -- though not always
historically accurate -- are real keys
that provide the disciple with genuine
truths in his spiritual quest.
In
conformation of what Origen said
regarding the fact that in the narrative
of the scriptures there exists many
things that are not true, Peter said:
“If,
therefore, some of the Scriptures are
true and some false, with good reason
said our Master, 'Be ye good
money-changers,' inasmuch as in the
Scriptures there are some true sayings
and some spurious. And to those who err
by reason of the false scriptures He
fitly showed the cause of their error,
saying, 'Ye do therefore err, not
knowing the true things of the
Scriptures; for this reason ye are
ignorant also of the power of God.’”
Origen On
Allegory: In
his celebrated work, De Principiis,
Origen wrote concerning the factualness
of the literal narrative of the
scriptures:
“Where the word found that things done
according to the history could be
adapted to these mystical senses, he
made use of them concealing from the
multitude the deeper meaning; but where
in the narrative of the development of
super-sensual things, there did not
follow the performance of those certain
events which were already indicated by
the mystical meaning, the scripture
interwove in the history the account of
some event that did not take place,
sometimes what could not have happened;
sometimes what could but did not.”
What
is Origen saying to us? Where the Word
found that using events from history
could fulfill the purpose of the
scriptures, the Word used these
historical events,
“concealing from the multitude the
deeper meaning”. In
this respect, Jesus lived and taught the
people the Royal Law of God and the
means to gain entrance into the
Kingdom. These things are true. But
scripture is designed for a greater
purpose than to inform us with respect
to the past -- scripture is the handbook
of those who desire to enter into Life.
What
is the purpose of the scriptures?
Surely not to teach us about history --
how can history open the door to the
Kingdom within us. By placing
spiritual truths in what appears to he
an historical document, scripture
accomplishes the necessary task of
putting the sacred truths of God in the
hands of the people -- in a language
they can understand and relate to --
even during that time when they are yet
carnal, and unable to comprehend the
Mysteries of God. By writing the
scriptures in this fashion, the carnal
Jew could relate to the scriptures
because the writings appeared -- on the
surface -- to communicate and manifest a
history of the people who were using
them. Yet, Origen warns that, even
when the scriptures are historically
accurate, there is concealed within the
narrative a deeper meaning than what is
grasped by the carnal reader.
Was
there a historical man named Jesus?
Yes -- but it is the Living Christ that
will save you. Because the scriptures
are written for the purpose of assisting
the disciples in finding the Christ,
even when the scriptures are conveying
historical truths pertaining to the
Christ, the genuine message is still
embedded within the body of the text.
Why? Because the purpose of the
scriptures is that of a guide and road
map out of this world -- not to convey
to us a system of doctrines in which we
should blindly believe and remain
immersed in lives of materialism.
Why
two gospels? Why would Jesus have
incorporate in his teachings what has
been referred to as a secret doctrine?
The modern believer who only possesses a
very limited perception of higher
reality will reject the idea of an inner
meaning to the scriptures, and will
reason that Jesus would have spoken all
truths very clearly. To the carnal
believer, if it is true that Jesus
concealed the mysteries, this would be
viewed as being dishonest. Moreover,
they would ask why, even when the
scriptures are historically accurate,
would the true meaning of the message be
concealed from the reader? The
believer asks the question: Why not just
write the truth. The answer is found
in the words of Ignatius:
“Might I not
write to you things more full of
mystery? But I fear to do so, lest I
should inflict injury on you who are
babes. Pardon me in this respect, lest,
as not being able to receive their
weighty import, ye should be strangled
by them”.
In
the words of St. Nazianzen:
“The Divine
Nature then is boundless and hard to
understand”. And in the
words of St. Gregory:
“The man who in
calculating the transcendent powers of
the Deity limits them by his own is a
fool”. In order to
perceive God and reality, man must go
beyond the physical, and activate his
own spiritual nature that is lying
dormant within his carnal nature.
Until this spiritual nature is
manifested, man's true reality makes no
sense, and man is unable to understand
things of any real value.
Carnal man places great confidence and
reliance on the events of history -- so
the Holy Spirit uses what appears to be
historical narratives to convey great
spiritual truths in the form of
allegories. Origen writes that some
parts of these historical narratives are
based upon a correct perception of
historical facts. This causes us to
adopt them, and cling to them as a
source of spiritual truth. But, Origen
warns, even when the narratives of the
scriptures are historically accurate,
they are still written in such a way
that a higher level of spiritual truth
is contained within the veil of what is
written.
Did
Jesus heal a man who was born blind?
Yes he did. But how does this
knowledge of an historical event draw
you closer to God? Even if it makes
you believe and have faith in Jesus,
this knowledge means nothing if it does
not provoke you to strive to walk in The
Way. On the other hand, when you begin
to recognize the fact that all men born
of woman are congenitally blind from a
spiritual perspective -- and will remain
blind until healed by the Son of God --
then this knowledge has the capacity to
provoke you to change, and cause you to
desire to see and behold man's true
reality.
Did
Jesus have twelve disciples? He had
many disciples -- but the number twelve
is of the greatest importance because of
its relevance to the mind of man as he
begins the process of walking in The
Way. Therefore, it does not injure the
people of the simple faith to believe
that Jesus had twelve disciples -- but
it is important for the seeker who looks
beyond the narrative of the text to
perceive the blueprint of the mind that
he must bring into a state of harmony in
order to walk in The Way.
Unlike our modern text books which are
different for each level of instruction,
the scriptures are written for believers
and disciples of all levels of spiritual
maturity. This is seen in the words of
Origen when he wrote:
“Since, then,
it was the intention of the Holy Spirit
to enlighten with respect to these and
similar subjects, those holy souls who
had devoted themselves to the service of
the truth, this object was kept in view,
in the second place, for the sake of
those who either could not or would not
give themselves to this labor and toil
by which they might deserve to be
instructed in or to recognize things of
such value and importance, to wrap up
and conceal, as we said before, in
ordinary language, under the covering of
some history and narrative of visible
things, hidden mysteries. There is
therefore introduced into the narrative
of the visible creation, and the
creation and formation of the first man;
then the offspring which followed from
him in succession, and some of the
actions which were done by the good
among his posterity, are related, and
occasionally certain crimes also, which
are stated to have been committed by
them as being human; and afterwards
certain unchaste or wicked deeds also
are narrated as being the acts of the
wicked. The description of battles,
moreover, is given in a wonderful
manner, and the alternations of victors
and vanquished, by which certain
ineffable mysteries are made known to
those who know how to investigate
statements of that kind. By an admirable
discipline of wisdom, too, the law of
truth, even of the prophets, is
implanted in the Scriptures of the law,
each of which is woven by a divine art
of wisdom, as a kind of covering and
veil of spiritual truths; and this is
what we have called the 'body' of
Scripture, so that also, in this way,
what we have called the covering of the
letter, woven by the art of wisdom,
might be capable of edifying and
profiting many, when others would derive
no benefit”.
Thus,
the body of the scriptures which are not
necessarily historically accurate, are
“capable of
edifying and profiting many”
by the reading of the literal word.
Yet, as the believer matures, he begins
to realize that the endless portrayal of
wars, genealogies, and stories of carnal
strife against Divine Providence, are
absolutely meaningless in the life of
the disciple. As he begins to
spiritually develop, and starts to
experience a shift in perception, he
begins to realize that these wars,
genealogies and strife in the flesh have
great meaning within his own being, as
he travails to overcome his carnal
nature in his quest to enter the
extended realm of his soul. What,
therefore, the carnal believer sees as
history, the disciple sees as great
spiritual truths that are imparted to
him in his pursuit of spiritual
perfection and manifestation.
Origen writes that the scriptures
contain many places where what is
written literally could not have
happened. In examination of this
statement we ask why? Why not create a
written word which was totally
factual? The answer that Origen
provides to this question is once again
very simple:
“But as if, in all the instances of
this covering (i.e., of this history),
the logical connection and order of the
law had been preserved, we would not
certainly believe, when thus possessing
the meaning of Scripture in a continuous
series, that anything else was contained
in it save what was indicated on the
surface; so for that reason divine
wisdom took care that certain
stumbling-blocks, or interruptions, to
the historical meaning should take
place, by the introduction into the
midst (of the narrative) of certain
impossibilities and incongruities; that
in this way the very interruption of the
narrative might, as by the interposition
of a bolt, present an obstacle to the
reader, whereby he might refuse to
acknowledge the way which conducts to
the ordinary meaning; and being thus
excluded and debarred from it, we might
be recalled to the beginning of another
way, in order that, by entering upon a
narrow path, and passing to a loftier
and more sublime road, he might lay open
the immense breadth of divine wisdom”.
What
Origen states is not only true, but is
of the utmost importance for us to
comprehend in our present day: If the
scriptures were historically accurate,
then we would believe, and never move
beyond the written word. In never
moving beyond the written word, we would
fail to develop those parts of our mind
that relate to our soul and spiritual
natures and reality -- and in our
failure to mature, we would remain lost
in this carnal world, and never open the
door to the Kingdom within our being.
From a scriptural perspective, the
prodigal son would never return home to
his Father.
Origen and many of the other early
Church Fathers comprehended this design
and higher purpose of the Gospel. They
understood that the scriptures are
written in such a way that our reading
them would be interrupted by the many
instances where what we read literally
is not true -- and in coming to this
scriptural roadblock, the intension was
for us to seek to understand the deeper
meaning -- a meaning that can only be
perceived by drawing closer to our own
spiritual nature.
UnTruths
Written Into Scriptures:
Some
of the more outrageous and blatant
untruths in the literal word would be
the classic case of the sun and moon
standing still:
“Then Joshua spoke to the LORD in
the day when the LORD delivered up the
Amorites before the sons of Israel, and
he said in the sight of Israel, 'O sun,
stand still at Gibeon, and O moon in the
valley of Aijalon.' So the sun stood
still, and the moon stopped, until the
nation avenged themselves of their
enemies. Is it not written in the book
of Jashar? And the sun stopped in the
middle of the sky, and did not hasten to
go down for about a whole day”
(Josh 10:12-13 NAS). In the first
instance, the sun does not revolve
around the earth. Secondly, there
exists sufficient records of the time in
question to confirm that such an event
never took place.
“Nor was it only
with regard to those Scriptures which
were composed down to the advent of
Christ that the Holy Spirit thus dealt”
writes Origen,
“but as being
one and the same Spirit, and proceeding
from one God, He dealt in the same way
with the evangelists and apostles. For
even those narratives which He inspired
them to write were not composed without
the aid of that wisdom of His, the
nature of which we have above explained.
Whence also in, them were intermingled
not a few things by which, the
historical order of the narrative being
interrupted and broken up, the attention
of the reader might be recalled, by the
impossibility of the case, to an
examination of the inner meaning”.
Just
one of these examples are provided at
the time of the crucifixion where it
reads:
“And
it was about the sixth hour, and there
was a darkness over all the earth until
the ninth hour. And the sun was
darkened, and the veil of the temple was
rent in the midst” (Luke
23:44-45 KJV). There exists sufficient
historical records of that time to
demonstrate conclusively that the earth
was never plunged into darkness for a
period of three hours. In view of the
fact that this event took place at the
time of the Passover, when the moon is
full, it could not have been an
eclipse. Moreover, neither can an
eclipse bring darkness over all the
earth for a period of three hours.
Since
this event could not have taken place in
the historical sense, why is it
reported? Origen explains this when he
writes that, in the development of
“super-sensual things… the scripture
interwove in the history the account of
some event that did not take place”
-- which denotes episodes such as these
in the scriptures that a reasonable mind
must conclude is not historically
accurate. In the words of Origen,
“sometimes what could not have
happened” -- events reported as
history that could not have taken place
-- and
“sometimes what could but did not”.
Sometimes the inconsistencies in
scripture are blatant. This is done
intentionally, so the believer is unable
to read the text of the body of
scripture in its literal sense.
Speaking of the conversion of Paul along
the road to Damascus, Acts 9:7 reads:
“And the men which journeyed with him
stood speechless, hearing a voice, but
seeing no man”. Yet, in Acts
22:9 the narrative reads:
“And
they that were with me saw indeed the
light, and were afraid; but they heard
not the voice of him that spake to me”.
The discerning reader will immediately
ask which account was true? In the
first instance they heard the voice but
saw nothing, in the second they saw the
light but heard nothing. Thus, we are
presented with two contradictory
witnesses pertaining to the same event.
By
design the reader is supposed to
question and reason to themselves that,
if the same person wrote both accounts,
then why were they written in direct
opposition to each other? If you look
in the many Bible commentaries you will
observe numerous creative attempts to
explain away this apparent
contradiction. Yet, none of them
perceives that Saul/Paul is spoken of as
being in The Way -- that Saul in this
New Testament rendition is synonymous
with the Saul who proceeded David as
king of Israel -- that only Saul/Paul
was struck down with blindness, while
those who were with him were not -- and
that they were on their way to Damascus
-- that Saul/Paul was blind for a period
of three days -- that a disciple named
Ananias was told in a vision to go to
Saul/Paul, who would be at the house of
Judas, on a street named
“straight”, and heal and baptize
him.
This
account is so rich with important
symbolism and meaning to the disciple,
that it is almost inconceivable that it
could be read as an historical, rather
than a spiritual event. The idea that
Saul (the forerunner of David) was in
The Way, and was blinded by the Light
for a period of three days (a period of
time used throughout the scriptures to
denote a process of spiritual
transformation), and was at the house of
Judas (the betrayer of the Christ), on a
street named straight, where he was to
be baptized. Thus, we see the common
references to the command to
“Enter ye in at the strait gate”
(Matt 7:13 KJV);
“Prepare ye the
way of the Lord, make his paths
straight”
(Matt 3:3 KJV); as
well as the connection between the
concept of the straight path and
baptism: “Every valley shall be
filled, and every mountain and hill
shall be brought low; and the crooked
shall be made straight, and the rough
ways shall be made smooth; And all flesh
shall see the salvation of God. Then
said he to the multitude that came forth
to be baptized of him…” (Luke
3:5-7 KJV). While it is impossible to
believe the two accounts literally in an
historical sense, the purpose of the
text is to force us to look beyond the
letter and into the spirit, as
demonstrated in the words of the
Apostle: “Who also hath made us
able ministers of the new testament; not
of the letter, but of the spirit: for
the letter killeth, but the spirit
giveth life” (2 Cor 3:6 KJV).
What
is important here is that the reader
understand the things conveyed not as
the conversion of an historical man, but
rather the evolution of consciousness
from Stephen who was stoned by Saul and
the Jews -- to Saul who began to walk in
The Way -- was transformed from a Jew
who was blind when he resided at the
house of Judas, the betrayer of Christ
-- and after his baptism became Paul,
who was the little one (meaning of the
name Paul) who was chosen to serve the
Lord by bringing the teachings of The
Way to the Gentiles -- Gentiles being
that part of us that worships the gods
(powers and things) of this world.
Where these things mean very little to
us from an historical perspective, they
are of the highest importance to us from
the perspective of spiritual events that
are to take place in the life of the
disciple.
Was
Paul an historical man? Yes. But
what is conveyed in the scriptures is
not historical -- and cannot even be
read in a literal sense. What is
important is that we see that the death
of Stephen -- a man who is constantly
referred to as a person of great faith,
and whose name is defined in the
Thayer’s Lexicon as one who is
“crowned”. As we investigate
we must also recognize that Stephen was
one of seven deacons in the Jerusalem
Church, and the first martyr. Just as
important is the fact that after Stephen
is introduced into the narrative of the
scriptures, we see the recital of an
historical account of the Jewish people
-- and in this recital, the names,
places, events and numbers are conveyed
in such a manner so as to instruct the
disciple into the necessary stages with
respect to the evolution in
consciousness and God awareness.
Death
in the scriptures has nothing to do with
physical death -- but rather, the
transitioning from one level of
consciousness to another. Thus, when
Stephen is stoned by the angry Jews, we
see the immergence of Saul -- which
Thayer’s Lexicon defines as having to do
with desire. Again in the
transformation of this desire into Paul,
which is defined as the
“little
one”, we are presented with the
pattern that one must
“turn about”,
and become a “little one”,
in order to enter the Kingdom. This
message is very plainly seen in the
warning of Jesus when he said:
“Truly, I say to you, unless you turn
and become like children, you will never
enter the kingdom of heaven”
(Matt 18:3 RSV).
Intentional Conflicts In Text:
In order to force the reader to stop,
and contemplate the inner spiritual
message, a conflicting account is
purposely entered into the scriptures:
Acts 9:7 reads: “And the men which
journeyed with him stood speechless,
hearing a voice, but seeing no man”.
Yet, in Acts 22:9 the narrative reads:
“And they that were with me saw
indeed the light, and were afraid; but
they heard not the voice of him that
spake to me”. It means
absolutely nothing for the modern reader
to believe that Saul was converted on
the road to Damascus -- there is no
spiritual edification or uplifting when
we relate this knowledge to an
historical event at the beginning of our
Common Era. But what is conveyed
spiritually is of great value to the
disciple in search of the Light -- and
must bring about a change of mind in his
quest to open the door to the Kingdom.
Thus the disciple begins to see his own
transformation from the death of Stephen
as spirit became clothed with flesh, to
Saul -- from a Jew to Paul -- from Paul
the little one, whose blindness was
healed by Ananias -- the gift from God.
The
many points at which the scriptures
conflict in order to force the reader to
look for the inner meaning is so
numerous, that an entire book could be
written in their compilation. Acts
7:14 has 75 persons coming with Jacob
into Egypt -- Gen 46:27; Ex 1:5; Deut
10:22 state there were 70. Acts
7:16-17 has Jacob buried in Shechem --
Gen 49:28-30; 50:13 buried in Mamre
which is Hebron according to Gen
23:19. If the Holy Spirit wrote both
sets of scriptures, there should have
been uniformity between them.
Moreover, if the New Testament authors
were attempting to convince others that
they knew what they were speaking about
from a literal sense, they would have
been very careful to get the facts
correct.
The Genealogies:
Perhaps one of the finest examples of
the carnal mind's attempt to explain
away what it should be investigating is
demonstrated in the genealogies of
Jesus. The fact that the genealogy
presented in Luke is not the same as
that in Matthew has been the source of
many dogmatic theories. But the fact
that the genealogy in Matthew contains
four women, and three foreigners, should
immediately send up a red flag warning
that these genealogies cannot be read
literally.
Two
of the women were strangers to the
commonwealth of Israel, Rachab a
Canaanitess, and a harlot besides, and
Ruth the Moabitess. In the pedigree of
the kings of Judah, between Joram and
Ozias (v. 8), there are three left out,
namely, Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah --
and therefore Joram could not have begat
Ozias. When it is said (v. 12) that
Jechonias begat Salathiel, that
Jechonias was the son of that Jehoiakim
who was carried into Babylon, the
scriptures tell us that Jechonias was
childless (Jer. 22:30), and in direct
contradiction to what is written in
Matthew, it is written that
“No
man of his seed shall prosper”.
In
order to insure that the genealogies
cannot be read literally it is further
stated in Matthew: “Thus there
were fourteen generations in all from
Abraham to David, fourteen from David to
the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from
the exile to the Christ” (Matt
1:17 NIV). With regard to the many
problems presented in the genealogies,
the Adam Clark Commentary writes:
"Josias begat Jechonias and his
brethren, about the time they were
carried away to Babylon:] There are
three considerable difficulties in this
verse. Josias was not the father of
Jechonias; he was only the grandfather
of that prince: (1 Chr. 3:14-16) . 2.
Jechonias had no brethren; at least,
none are on record. Josias died 20 years
before the Babylonian captivity took
place, and therefore Jechonias and his
brethren could not have been begotten
about the time they were carried away to
Babylon. To this may be added a fourth
difficulty, namely, there are only
thirteen in this 2nd class of
generations; or forty-one, instead of
forty-two, in the whole".
When
we closely examine the literal word of
the Bible, all of the scriptures could
be deciphered in this same manner to
demonstrate the inconsistencies from an
historical perspective. Moreover, the
problem would be even more serious than
it is at present if the Bible had been
left in its original condition. In
many instances, where these many places
that appear to be contradictions were
detected, they were fixed by later
scribes who copied the scriptures. In
their ignorance of the very manner in
which the scripture are composed, every
time they fixed a contradiction or
offending verse, they defiled and
obstructed the very purpose of the Word
of God. In the case of the difference
between the genealogies of Matthew and
Luke, there are Greek texts that exist
where the genealogy of Luke was replaced
by the one in Matthew in the endeavor to
conceal this easily detected flaw in the
written word.
Where
the carnal believer sees a genealogy
that would be impossible to be read
literally, it never dawns on the readers
that what we have is the pedigree of the
three minds of man -- physical, mental
(soul), and spiritual -- and that in the
formation of the series of numbers in
the pattern of fourteen, fourteen and
fourteen, what is being indicated has
great spiritual significance.
Moreover, the fact that there is
forty-one, instead of forty-two, is also
important in our quest to understanding
the spiritual meaning of what is being
conveyed with regard to what Jesus had
yet to accomplish in his endeavor to
become the first Son re-born into the
Kingdom.
Origen - Scripture Objectives:
Does all these things mean that the
scriptures are untrue? In the words of
Paul: God forbid! It is us who is not
real and untrue; not the scriptures.
In understanding why the Bible is
written in this manner, we must not
allow ourselves to be burdened by carnal
thinking, and lose sight of what sets
scriptures apart from any other writings
known to man.
“The chief object
of the Holy Spirit”,
writes
Origen, “is to preserve the coherence
of the spiritual meaning, either in
those things which ought to be done or
which have been already performed, if He
anywhere finds that those events which,
according to the history, took place,
can be adapted to a spiritual meaning,
He composed a texture of both kinds in
one style of narration, always
concealing the hidden meaning more
deeply; but where the historical
narrative could not be made appropriate
to the spiritual coherence of the
occurrences, He inserted sometimes
certain things which either did not take
place or could not take place; sometimes
also what might happen, but what did
not: and He does this at one time in a
few words, which, taken in their
'bodily' meaning, seem incapable of
containing truth, and at another by the
insertion of many. And this we find
frequently to be the case in the
legislative portions, where there are
many things manifestly useful among the
'bodily' precepts, but a very great
number also in which no principle of
utility is at all discernible, and
sometimes even things which are judged
to be impossibilities. Now all this, as
we have remarked, was done by the Holy
Spirit in order that, seeing those
events which lie on the surface can be
neither true nor useful, we may be led
to the investigation of that truth which
is more deeply concealed, and to the
ascertaining of a meaning worthy of God
in those Scriptures which we believe to
be inspired by Him”.
Origen writes that we must come to the
realization that “those events
which lie on the surface can be neither
true nor useful”. In
opposition to this statement we ask:
Isn't the belief in the historical Jesus
useful? The answer is yes, but only to
the degree that the historical narrative
assists the disciple in manifesting the
Living Christ in their life at the
present time. What does the name Jesus
(Yehshua) mean? What must we do in
order to bring about that state of mind
which is portrayed in the scriptures in
the life of the historical Jesus, into
our present life?
What
is important is that we
“be led to
the investigation of that truth which is
more deeply concealed”. Since
we know that everything we can learn
from others in this world is of a
preparatory nature, and the one true
doctrine that will nourish us can only
be revealed to those who are in
“the house”, and are deserving
to be taught privately the Mysteries of
the Kingdom, we must therefore seek to
enter into the house with our Lord and
Savior. It is important that we
perceive that whatever is written
literally in the historical narrative is
the exoteric doctrine -- or good news --
that serves as merely the invitation to
the masses to enter the mystical house
of the Lord where the Secrets of
Creation can be revealed to the disciple
in search of the Truth and the Mysteries
of God.
In
fully comprehending these statements in
relation to the whole purpose of the
teachings of The Way, let us again
examine the definitive statement which
conveys to us the very essence of the
Gospel -- and especially the Revelation
of John: “Blessed are those who do
His commandments, that they may have the
right to the tree of life, and may enter
through the gates into the city. But
outside are dogs and sorcerers and
sexually immoral and murderers and
idolaters, and whoever loves and
practices a lie” (Rev 22:14-15
NKJ).
If
the Revelation represented the end of
the world, as is commonly believed by
the majority of Christians today, then
why are those who remain outside the
city portrayed as “dogs and
sorcerers and sexually immoral and
murderers and idolaters, and whoever
loves and practices a lie”?
Armageddon, then, indicates the
disciples personal conflict as he
endeavors to overcome his own lower
nature through the crucifixion of what
is symbolized by the flesh, in order
that he can possess the Knowledge of the
fruit of the Tree of Life, transcend the
natural barriers of this world, and
“enter through the gates into the
city”. With regard to those
who call themselves Christian, and
continue to remain in this world, these
are the ones who, like the Sadducees and
Pharisees, “loves and practices a
lie” in their refusal to follow
in the footsteps of the Master.
Again
let us revisit the statement by the
Wycliffe Commentary on Genesis 2:7 where
it writes about the nature of man:
“Man's body was fashioned from the
dust of the ground, while his spirit
came from the very 'breath' of God. He
is literally a creature of two worlds;
both earth and heaven can claim him”.
What the fundamental teachings of the
New Covenant convey is that if man
“turns about”, and re-focuses
his direction in life through the
process of “opening and unloosing
the mind” -- freeing it from the
attachments and constraints of this
realm -- man will discover that God has
given him the power to gaze upon that
which is Eternal.
As
with all things Created by God, the
scriptures are multidimensional. Even
in what appears to be historical, we see
the same form being followed. Our
scholars know that Herod could not have
been king during that time frame that
Jesus was born. They also know that
the plight into Egypt to evade being
killed is also not true:
“Then
Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of
the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and
sent forth, and slew all the children
that were in Bethlehem, and in all the
coasts thereof, from two years old and
under, according to the time which he
had diligently inquired of the wise men”
(Matt 2:16 KJV). Such an act would
have been well documented in the
numerous writings of the many historians
of the time.
The
answer is found in the meaning of the
names Herod and Egypt -- and why it was
important to make the connection between
the same episode that are portrayed in
the saving of Moses when the slaughter
of the infants was ordered. Thus, what
is a meaningless and worthless
historical account to the modern
believer, is used to convey great truths
to the disciple of the Light -- in that
they, themselves, must undergo these
same transformations in order for the
Christ to be born within them.
In an
attempt to clarify his position, and
place these things in their proper
perspective, Origen writes:
“No
one, I think, can doubt that the
statement that God walked in the
afternoon in paradise, and that Adam lay
hid under a tree, is related
figuratively in Scripture, that some
mystical meaning may be indicated by it.
The departure of Cain from the presence
of the Lord will manifestly cause a
careful reader to inquire what is the
presence of God, and how any one can go
out from it. But not to extend the task
which we have before us beyond its due
limits, it is very easy for any one who
pleases to gather out of holy Scripture
what is recorded indeed as having been
done, but what nevertheless cannot be
believed as having reasonably and
appropriately occurred according to the
historical account. The same style of
Scriptural narrative occurs abundantly
in the Gospels, as when the devil is
said to have placed Jesus on a lofty
mountain, that he might show Him from
thence all the kingdoms of the world,
and the glory of them. How could it
literally come to pass, either that
Jesus should be led up by the devil into
a high mountain, or that the latter
should show him all the kingdoms of the
world (as if they were lying beneath his
bodily eyes, and adjacent to one
mountain), i.e., the kingdoms of the
Persians, and Scythians, and Indians? or
how could he show in what manner the
kings of these kingdoms are glorified by
men? And many other instances similar to
this will be found in the Gospels by any
one who will read them with attention,
and will observe that in those
narratives which appear to be literally
recorded, there are inserted and
interwoven things which cannot be
admitted historically, but which may be
accepted in a spiritual signification”.
Where
the carnal mind looks upon the world and
attempts to see continuity, it is the
disciple who knows full well that we
dwell in a world of incompleteness and
illusion. Where the carnal believer
attempts to read the scriptures as a
witness to historical events, the
disciple probes to the depths of the
scriptures and understands them as the
means by which we begin to awaken to the
inner Truth and the Light of the
Spirit.
The
believer will rightly ask: If God wants
us to know what to believe, why would
the scriptures contain events that did
not, and even what could not have
happened? Again, the purpose of the
scriptures is not to induce people to
believe what happened in the past, and
then dwell in the comfort of their
beliefs -- but rather, to focus their
attention on what is taking place at the
present time in their own lives. That
the scriptures were written to coincide
with a particular time or event in
history, only makes them that much more
acceptable to the common people. This
acceptance is important -- because even
though the scriptures are not
historically accurate, they contain
within the body of the narrative the
essential truths that each of us must
embrace in order to find the ultimate
Truth which is our destiny. In their
original form -- prior to their being
defiled by the Roman Church -- what was
written in the scriptures was one
hundred percent accurate with respect to
man's quest to enter the Kingdom.
Thus, in their original form, the
scriptures were the Truth of all Truths!
The
Allegorical Genesis:
With regard to reading the narrative as
actual events in history, Origen wrote:
“What man of sense will agree with
the statement that the first, second and
third days in which the evening is named
and the morning, were without sun, moon
and stars, and the first day without a
heaven. What man is found such an
idiot as to suppose that God planted
trees in paradise in Eden, like a
husbandman, and planted therein the tree
of life, perceptible to the eyes and
senses, which gave life to the eater
thereof; and another tree which gave to
the eater thereof a knowledge of good
and evil? I believe that every man must
hold these things for images, under
which the hidden sense lies concealed”
(Origen - Huet., Prigeniana, 167 Franck,
p. 142).
A man
of reason will ask: If there was no sun,
moon and stars, how could there have
been a day, night and dawn of a new
day? “What man of sense”,
Origen asks, will blindly believe such
statements? This fundamental question
is very similar to that asked by Jesus
with regard to the blindness of the
Sadducees and Pharisees who also
attempted to read the scriptures
literally. Who could believe that God
planted trees in the Garden of Eden
which gave to the eater the knowledge of
good and evil, while the fruit of
another tree gave eternal life? These
things are not history, writes Origen,
but rather “images, under which
the hidden sense lies concealed”.
Origen explains that the scriptures are
an allegory that conceal the deeper
truths of the spirit, and writes:
“It is sufficient however, to represent
in the style of a historic narrative
what is intended to convey a secret
meaning in the garb of history, that
those who have the capacity may work out
for themselves all that relates to the
subject.”
When
Clement (Clementine Homilies) asked of
Peter concerning the many things in
scripture that are not true, he said:
“Truly I rejoice, and I give thanks
to God, who in all things doeth well.
However, he knows that I shall be able
to think nothing other than that all
things are for God. Wherefore do not
suppose that I ask questions, as
doubting the words concerning God, or
those that are to be spoken, but rather
that I may learn, and so be able myself
to instruct another who is ingenuously
willing to learn. Wherefore tell me what
are the falsehoods added to the
Scriptures, and how it comes that they
are really false. Then Peter answered:
Even although you had not asked me, I
should have gone on in order, and
afforded you the exposition of these
matters, as I promised. Learn, then, how
the Scriptures misrepresent Him in many
respects, that you may know when you
happen upon them”.
In
his Ecclestical History Eusebius
writes that: “Many were led astray
by reading the allegorical contents of
the scriptures literally in the method
of the Pharisees and Sadducees”.
In these words we are provided great
insight into the true heresy of the
Pharisees and Sadducees, and why Jesus
condemned them as being blind guides.
When it is realized that Jesus was born
among the Essenes, who were Gnostic, and
a people who comprehended the inner
meaning of the Law, we begin to
understand that the true focus of the
conflict in scripture was the spiritual
Israelites vs the carnal Jews. On the
side of the spiritual Israelites was
Jesus and the Essenes -- who perceived
the true meaning of the scriptures as
the guide that assists the disciple in
opening the doors to the true Temple of
God. The Pharisees and Sadducees, on
the other hand, read the scriptures
literally -- and were under the
erroneous belief that God dwells in
temples made with man's hands -- and
employed a body of priests -- and
approved a series of sacrifices, rituals
and observances.
Key Of Knowledge: What
was it that the Lord accused the
Pharisees of doing?
“Woe to you
lawyers! For you have taken away the key
of knowledge; you did not enter in
yourselves, and those who were entering
in you hindered” (Luke 11:52
NAS). Yet, modern Christians today do
not believe this statement. We do not
believe that the lawyers possessed the
keys of knowledge prior to the advent of
Christ. We thus fail to understand
that the keys of knowledge is the
understanding of the true threefold
nature of the scriptures, and man's
inherent ability to learn directly from
the Christ within.
Because we read the scriptures in the
manner of the Pharisees, we have
ourselves become the modern day Jews in
opposition to the Lord. Thus, the
scriptural confrontation continues right
down to this present day -- the
spiritual vs. the carnal believers. In
the words of Origen:
“Many, not
understanding the Scriptures in a
spiritual sense, but incorrectly, have
fallen into heresies”. Anyone
who attempts to read the scriptures,
seeing the body only, while ignoring the
mind and spirit, are doomed to fall into
these heresies.
From
a scriptural perspective, even the name
Jew contains a very real message to the
disciple of the Light. Jesus warned of
the pitfalls of division -- i.e.,
“But he, knowing their thoughts, said
unto them, Every kingdom divided against
itself is brought to desolation; and a
house divided against a house falleth”
(Luke 11:17 KJV). The Jews, being the
decedents of Judah, represented one
twelfth of the children of Israel. The
disciple understands that, throughout
both the Old and New Testament
scriptures, the Bible is not speaking
about a people who called themselves
Jews, but rather the spiritual condition
of mind -- a mind that by virtue of its
carnal perception of the Word, is
limited to only one twelfth of its
potential -- which potential can only
begin to be realized when we contemplate
and embrace the difference between the
partiality of the Jew, and the
completeness of Israel.
In
this respect, from a biblical
perspective the majority of believers
today are represented in the scriptures
as Jews, others as Samaritans, and still
many others as the people of the
Nations. Moreover, we are not just
Jews, or Samaritans, or of the Nations
-- in that, each one of us possesses
aspects of our person that are as the
multitudes of separate personalities --
separate personalities wherein each must
be converted, brought into oneness, and
raised up as the children of Israel.
In all things what we perceive as the
one, is comprised of the many, and the
disciple understands that the many
factions need to be brought into total
harmony if the prodigal son is to return
to the Father. Thus, it is the
realization of these great spiritual
truths that enables us to understand the
words of Origen where he wrote:
“Scripture contains an unhistorical
element in-woven with the history, in
order that the worthlessness of the
latter may drive us to seek the
spiritual meaning” (Origen
quoted under Origen Adamntius; The
Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics).
The Righteous Need
Not A Physician: Perhaps one of the most classic verses
that remains an enigma to believers
today is where Jesus states:
“They
that be whole need not a physician, but
they that are sick… for I am not come to
call the righteous, but sinners to
repentance” (Matt 9:12-13
KJV). By present day religious
doctrine Jesus made a mistake, and it is
apparent from a modern dogmatic
perspective that he did not know what he
was speaking about. From our
perception of mankind, no one is whole,
and there are no righteous people.
Contrary to what is clearly written in
the scriptures, we believe that Jesus
came to call everyone. In
Matthew
Henry's Commentary we read that:
“Jesus Christ is the great Physician
of souls… Sin-sick souls have need of
this Physician, for their disease is
dangerous; nature will not help itself;
no man can help us; such need have we of
Christ, that we are undone, eternally
undone, without him. Sensible sinners
see their need, and apply themselves to
him accordingly”. Thus, the
Matthew Henry Commentary does not agree
with the words that Jesus spoke, that
only those who are sick need a
physician, and he did not come to call
the righteous.
The
Adam Clarke Commentary clarifies
this doctrine when it states that:
“Jesus Christ represents himself here
as the sovereign Physician of souls.
That all stand in need of his healing
power. That men must acknowledge their
spiritual maladies, and the need they
have of his mercy, in order to be healed
by him. That it is the most inveterate
and dangerous disease the soul can be
afflicted with to imagine itself whole,
when the sting of death, which is sin,
has pierced it through in every part,
infusing its poison everywhere”.
Again we see that the Adam Clark
Commentary also does not believe the
words of Jesus.
In
our present day understanding of the
scriptures we cannot even comprehend the
meaning of the words:
“They that
be whole need not a physician”.
Why? Because we have lost sight of the
very Kingdom that Jesus came to declare
-- a Kingdom that exists within each of
us (Lk 17:21 KJV). Like Cain, each of
us has gone forth from the presence of
God, and it is the destiny of all the
prodigal sons of the Father to return to
the Kingdom. In order to accomplish
this, we must first understand what the
Bible means when it states that we must
be whole?
The
Mystical Essenes and early Gnostic
Christians understood the term
“whole” as indicating one who
converts the Jew, Samaritan, and the
Nations within himself, and brings the
twelve spheres of mind together into
abiding harmony -- reigning over his
three natures (body, mind and spirit) --
and consciously dwells in the Kingdom
that is accessed within himself. The
disciple also understands that when the
twelve spheres of mind which are
represented in the Revelation as the
Tree of Life, are divided, what we have
is the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and
Evil. Thus the words of Origen:
“What man is found such an idiot as to
suppose that God planted trees in
paradise in Eden, like a husbandman, and
planted therein the tree of life,
perceptible to the eyes and senses,
which gave life to the eater thereof;
and another tree which gave to the eater
thereof a knowledge of good and evil? I
believe that every man must hold these
things for images, under which the
hidden sense lies concealed”.
We
fail to understand these elementary
truths of the scriptures, because what
is today called the Christian religion
has been cast out of The Way by
Constantine and the Church of the Roman
Empire. Having been imbued with a
carnal mindset, we simply cannot come to
terms with the words:
“Whoever
walks blamelessly will be saved”
(Prov 28:18 NKJ). Why? Because in the
adoption of Augustine's doctrine of
Original Sin that attempts to explain
away sacred spiritual symbols that are
impossible to understand from a carnal
perspective, we don't believe that any
man can walk blamelessly without the
historical Jesus. In our doctrines, we
do not believe Jesus. We do not
believe that the Kingdom is within us --
and when we manifest the laws of the
inner Kingdom in our outer life, we will
walk blamelessly. We view the Christ
as an historical personage, and not the
Light that calls to us from within the
door of our soul.
In
our scriptures at Luke 10:25-28 (NIV) we
find “an expert in the law”
asking Jesus,
“what must I
do to inherit eternal life?”
To
this question Jesus asks: “What
is written in the Law?” Yet,
in accordance with our present day
doctrines of belief, Jesus never would
have answered in this manner. Again we
see another scriptural sighting where it
is clear that Jesus is in need of
instruction with regard to what we must
do to be saved.
From
the perspective of modern Christian
dogma and belief: There is nothing in
the Law that could save the man, and
this passage of scriptures represents
just one more enigma. Moreover, we are
unable to even comprehend why Jesus
would ask him the question: What is
written in the Law. In the narrative
the man answers and says:
“Love
the Lord your God with all your heart
and with all your soul and with all your
strength and with all your mind; and,
Love your neighbor as yourself”.
In our Bibles today Jesus replies:
“Do this and you will live”;
but in the Bible used in the second
century by Clement of Alexandria, Jesus
replied: “This do, and thou shalt
be saved” (The Instructor, Book
3).
Fundamentally, modern Christians do not
believe these words of Jesus! Why?
Because we don't believe the Law can
either save us, or bestow upon us
life. If what is written here is true,
and one can be saved by fulfilling the
Law, then where does belief in the
historical Jesus come into the
picture? Moreover, if this is true,
that would mean that modern day Jews who
fully embrace the Law could be saved,
even though they never converted to
Christianity.
In
the version of this scriptural encounter
contained in Mark 12:34, the reply of
Jesus takes on a whole new dimension.
In reply, Jesus said to the scribe when
he answered correctly:
“Thou art
not far from the kingdom of God”.
But we don't believe that either.
Why? Because in accordance with our
doctrines, one cannot be saved apart
from the historical Jesus.
What
is written in the gospel is no different
than what was conveyed by Paul when he
wrote: “For when Gentiles who do
not have the Law do instinctively the
things of the Law, these, not having the
Law, are a law to themselves”
(Rom 2:14 NAS). How could the Gentiles
who did not have the Law, keep the
precepts of the Law?
“For the
truth about God is known to them
instinctively; God has put this
knowledge in their hearts” (Rom
1:19 TLB). Thus, because we view the
scriptures from the same vision as the
Sadducees and Pharisees, we are
incapable of comprehending the reality
of what the Bible is conveying to us --
i.e., by doing good, and seeking to know
God -- our True Source of Being -- the
Christ that dwells in the heart of man
will reveal himself to the faithful, and
make known to them the means by which
they may enter the Kingdom.
Contrary to modern day Christian
doctrine: If a man lives on a remote
island -- having never heard the Law of
God spoken -- having never heard a word
about the Jesus of the New Testament --
and this man searches within his own
heart and manifests the truth
(instinctively), he will be saved -- as
seen in the words of Paul:
“For
when Gentiles who do not have the Law do
instinctively the things of the Law,
these, not having the Law, are a law to
themselves” (Rom 2:14 NAS) --
and in spirit, the Lord will come to the
man who instinctively does the things of
God in their life, and make them whole.
Thus, by fulfilling the Law of God that
is written in their hearts, we can begin
to comprehend the truth in the statement
that: “Whoever walks blamelessly
will be saved” (Prov 28:18
NKJ); and,
“They that be whole
need not a physician, but they that are
sick… for I am not come to call the
righteous, but sinners to repentance”
(Matt 9:12-13 KJV).
We
must ask the question: Why can’t the
modern Christian believe these many
passages of scriptures? Because,
having adopted the traditions of the
Pharisees and Sadducees, we look only to
the letter of the written word --
reading the scriptures as history --
rejecting the wisdom of both the
Essene/Ebionite/Nazirenes, as well as
the Gentile Christians, whereby they
used the scriptures as keys to open the
door to the Spirit and the Kingdom of
God within their our own minds and
being. An example of this same error
of reading the scriptures literally in
the manner of the Sadducees and
Pharisees is brought to light by
Eusebius, who writes of the doctrines
conceived by the early Christians Papias
and Irenaeus, and still held throughout
the modern Christian world today:
“Papias reproduces other stories
communicated to him by word of mouth,
together with some otherwise unknown
parables and teachings of the Saviour,
and other things of a more allegorical
character. He says that 'after the
resurrection of the dead there will be a
period of a thousand years when Christ's
kingdom will be set up on this earth in
material form'. I suppose he got these
notions by misinterpreting the apostolic
accounts and failing to grasp what they
said in mystic and symbolic language.
For he seems to have been a man of very
small intelligence, to judge from his
books. But it is partly due to him that
the great majority of churchmen after
him took the same view, relying on his
early date; e.g. Irenaeus and several
others, who clearly held the same
opinion” (Eusebius, Hist Eccl.,
Book III, 39.11).
The
mature spiritual Christian understands
the parables and the seemingly
historical events of the written word
not as signifying events in a past age
-- even if there is an historical basis
-- but rather, these events are seen as
spiritual events pertaining to the
plight of the disciple as they seek to
open the gates to the Kingdom within
their mind and being. When Eusebius
writes of Papias' doctrine that
“after the resurrection of the dead
there will be a period of a thousand
years when Christ's kingdom will be set
up on this earth in material form”,
he makes reference to the error of
Papias when he interprets the
“allegorical character” of the
scriptures in a literal fashion in the
manner of the Sadducees and Pharisees
and writes: “I suppose he got
these notions by misinterpreting the
apostolic accounts and failing to grasp
what they said in mystic and symbolic
language. For he seems to have been a
man of very small intelligence, to judge
from his books”. In these
words it is again important for us to
grasp what Eusebius states -- i.e., that
the apostolic accounts are written in
the “mystic and symbolic language”
of the Essene Gnostics. With regard to
the thousand years when the kingdom will
be set up on the earth -- Armageddon and
the second coming of Christ is
understood to signify the true war that
wages within the disciple in his mental
and spiritual quest to overcome the
elemental powers in his physical body,
and thereby reign in the Kingdom that
Jesus said is accessed within us (Luke
17:20-21).
If
Eusebius could meet with modern
Christians today, he would convey that
we are a people who have been greatly
deceived. He would ask: Why have we
taken upon ourselves the error of the
Sadducees and Pharisees and that of
Papias, Irenaeus and the others who
“got these notions by misinterpreting
the apostolic accounts and failing to
grasp what they said in mystic and
symbolic language”? When
Eusebius writes of Papias that he must
“have been a man of very small
intelligence, to judge from his books”,
he said this because any man who is
“outside” of the house, even
if they are one of carnal man's greatest
scholars, is of “very small
intelligence” -- using at best
only one twelfth of their mental
resources. In comparison to the
Gnostic or Spiritual Christians or
Hebrews who are the true children of
Israel, and who -- in their completion
of mind and spirit -- have found
entrance into the Kingdom -- the modern
believer has embraced only the simple
faith that Paul refers to as the
“milk” of the Gospel meant for
“babes in Christ”.
Eusebius questions how carnal Christians
can believe the doctrine that:
“after the resurrection of the dead
there will be a period of a thousand
years when Christ's kingdom will be set
up on this earth in material form”,
when Jesus clearly explained to the
Pharisees that the kingdom of God will
never come upon the earth in material
form: “The kingdom of God does not
come with your careful observation, nor
will people say, 'Here it is,' or 'There
it is,' because the kingdom of God is
within you” (Luke 17:20-21
NIV). It is because the Kingdom is a
Spiritual Kingdom within you that Thomas
can say in his gospel:
“Whoever
finds the explanation of these words
will not taste death”
-- and:
“When the Lord was asked by a certain
man, when should his kingdom come, he
said unto him, when two shall be one and
the without as the within, and the male
with the female, neither male nor
female”. Thus, the disciple
understands that the
“apostolic
accounts” are written in a
“mystic and symbolic language”
that only the Lord can open their mind
to see and understand.
In
the words of St. Augustine:
“What
the apostle says pertains to this
problem: 'For the letter killeth, but
the spirit quickeneth', that is, when
that which is said figuratively is taken
as though it were literal, it is
understood carnally. Nor can anything
more appropriately be called the death
of the soul than that condition in which
the thing which distinguishes us from
beasts, which is the understanding, is
subjected to the flesh in the pursuit of
the letter. He who follows the letter
takes figurative expressions as though
they were literal and does not refer the
things signified to anything else”
(De Doctrina Christiana).
When
St. Augustine quotes Paul with regard to
the saying
“the letter killeth,
but the spirit” makes alive, he
is making reference to those who read
the scriptures literally as historic
narratives vs those who perceive the
inner meaning of what is written.
“Tell me, ye that desire to be under
the law, do ye not hear the law?”
Writes the Apostle Paul to those who
want to read the written word
literally.
“For it is written,
that Abraham had two sons, the one by a
bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But
he who was of the bondwoman was born
after the flesh; but he of the freewoman
was by promise. Which things are an
allegory” (Gal 4:21-24 KJV).
In
these words we must ask what Paul is
conveying to us? The Apostle is
stating nothing different than that
expressed by either of the two
Clement's, Origen, or Eusebius when each
of these earliest of Christian witnesses
warn the believer that those
“babes in Christ” who observe
these things by the letter of the
written word cannot know the truth,
because the letter or body of the
scriptures cannot save us. The Apostle
states that to observe these things by
the letter is meaningless, because the
things written literally in the
scripture are an allegory -- which
allegory is a story which may on the
surface appear to be historical, but in
the sacred writings conceals a deeper
spiritual truth.
Paul On The
Allegory Of Abraham: From
an historical perspective, maybe there
was a person named Abraham -- maybe
there wasn't. Maybe he had two sons --
maybe more, maybe one, maybe none.
From the perspective of man entering
into the Kingdom, it makes no difference
whether the historical personage of
Abraham lived or not, or how many sons
he had. What matters is that we
understand that we cannot be free until
we rid ourselves of the covenant of the
flesh, which is the letter of the Law,
and cleave to the spiritual, which is
the Life that lies within the letter.
In the same way that the body of man
without the mind and spirit is dead, so
too is the written word of the
scriptures dead without the mind and
spirit, and belief in the letter and the
historical context cannot save us.
To
carnal believers such as the Sadducees
and Pharisees, it is very important that
Abraham was an historical person -- that
he had two sons -- and that they are of
the lineage of Sarah, his wife.
Without these things being historically
true, they would not be able to call
themselves the chosen people blest by
God. When John the Baptist saw the
Sadducees and Pharisees he said to them:
“And do not think you can say to
yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our
father.' I tell you that out of these
stones God can raise up children for
Abraham” (Matt 3:9 NIV). It is
important that we ask what was John
attempting to convey? In an opposite
fashion to the mystical Essenes, the
Sadducees and Pharisees viewed the
scriptures as literal historical
narratives. John the Baptist, who
through the Dead Sea Scrolls it has been
demonstrated was an Essene, and who
understood the scriptures in their
spiritual language, warned them that God
is not the God of carnal believers who
twist the meaning of the scriptures --
but rather, the God of the spiritual
believer who surrenders his life to the
Lord, and lives the Word of God in word,
thought and deed.
Do
you believe in the historical Jesus?
Do you believe that the historical Jesus
can save you? If you believe, that is
good, but be sure to heed his words when
he warned:
“And why call ye me,
Lord, Lord, and do not the things which
I say?” (Luke 6:46 KJV). The
New Testament scriptures were written
for the very purpose of your salvation
-- but those who do not do what the Lord
has commanded are unbelievers,
regardless of what they profess with
their lips.
With
regard to the body of the scriptures:
“Which things are an allegory”,
writes the Apostle,
“for these are
the two covenants; the one from the
mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage,
which is Agar. For this Agar is mount
Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to
Jerusalem which now is, and is in
bondage with her children. But Jerusalem
which is above is free, which is the
mother of us all. For it is written,
Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not;
break forth and cry, thou that
travailest not: for the desolate hath
many more children than she which hath
an husband. Now we, brethren, as Isaac
was, are the children of promise. But as
then he that was born after the flesh
persecuted him that was born after the
Spirit, even so it is now. Nevertheless
what saith the scripture? Cast out the
bondwoman and her son: for the son of
the bondwoman shall not be heir with the
son of the freewoman. So then, brethren,
we are not children of the bondwoman,
but of the free”
(Gal 4:24-31
KJV).
The
Apostle Paul writes that the story of
Abraham is not historically true, and is
an allegory. If this is so, how can
the Jews be the children of Abraham?
Origen would probably say: What man of
sense would believe that Sarah conceived
a child at the age of ninety-nine.
Does not the very concept of two nines
-- nine divided -- convey to us a state
of division? Is not this same state of
division presented to us in the New
Testament scriptures where it states:
“What do you think? If any man has a
hundred sheep, and one of them has gone
astray, does he not leave the
ninety-nine on the mountains and go and
search for the one that is straying?”
(Matt 18:12 NAS).
The
man of the spirit perceives that the
Hebrew Holy Men wrote and conveyed
messages in numbers -- and the number
nine has a profound meaning in relation
to the Kingdom. Therefore, the number
ninety-nine demonstrates a division that
can be overcome when we begin to
comprehend what it means to go and
search in the mountains in our quest for
the one hundredth sheep -- which is a
number that conveys wholeness and
completion.
In
view of the fact that the Apostle Paul
writes that the story of Abraham, Sarah,
and the two sons are not historically
true, how does this impact the genealogy
of Jesus? Was his lineage born from an
allegory -- or does the lineage itself
convey a series of profound sacred
truths to the disciple -- truths that
are concealed from the perception of the
carnal believer who sees only the letter
of the written word?
With
regard to the two covenants, we are the
children of the free woman so long as we
pursue the spirit of the Word, rather
than the flesh. In the words of St.
Augustine:
“He is a slave to a sign
who uses or worships a significant thing
without knowing what it signifies. But
he who uses or venerates a useful sign
divinely instituted whose signifying
force he understands does not venerate
what he sees and what passes away but
rather that to which all such things are
to be referred. Such a man is spiritual
and free, even during that time of
servitude in which it is not yet
opportune to reveal to carnal minds
those signs under whose yoke they are to
be tamed” (De Doctrina Christiana).
The
literal word of the scriptures are signs
that signify spiritual truths. The
literal word may be based upon
historical facts, or the text of the
narrative may be a complete
fabrication. Whether they are
historically accurate or not, they
appear in scripture as signs that
signify profound spiritual truths that
assist the disciple in his quest to
enter the Kingdom. Augustine writes
that: “He is a slave to a sign who
uses or worships a significant thing
without knowing what it signifies”.
These stories that resemble historical
narratives are allegories, not
history. These allegories are written
“when it is not yet opportune to
reveal to carnal minds those signs under
whose yoke they are to be tamed”.
Yet, those who perceive the deeper
meaning of the word,
“are
spiritual and free”.
Carnal believers will view these things
as confusing and not in accord with
their understanding of the scriptures.
They will rightly say: How can I believe
the scriptures when you state that they
are not historically accurate. With
regard to this position Origen wrote:
“Let no one, however, entertain the
suspicion that we do not believe any
history in Scripture to be real, because
we suspect certain events related in it
not to have taken place; or that no
precepts of the law are to be taken
literally, because we consider certain
of them, in which either the nature or
possibility of the case so requires,
incapable of being observed; or that we
do not believe those predictions which
were written of the Savior to have been
fulfilled in a manner palpable to the
senses; or that His commandments are not
to be literally obeyed. We have
therefore to state in answer, since we
are manifestly so of opinion, that the
truth of the history may and ought to be
preserved in the majority of instances.
For who can deny that Abraham was buried
in the double cave at Hebron, as well as
Isaac and Jacob, and each of their
wives? Or who doubts that Shechem was
given as a portion to Joseph? or that
Jerusalem is the metropolis of Judea, on
which the temple of God was built by
Solomon? - and countless other
statements. For the passages which hold
good in their historical acceptation are
much more numerous than those which
contain a purely spiritual meaning.
Then, again, who would not maintain that
the command to 'honor thy father and thy
mother, that it may be well with thee,'
is sufficient of itself without any
spiritual meaning, and necessary for
those who observe it? Especially when
Paul also has confirmed the command by
repeating it in the same words. And what
need is there to speak of the
prohibitions, 'Thou shalt not commit
adultery,' 'Thou shalt not steal,' 'Thou
shalt not bear false witness,' and
others of the same kind? And with
respect to the precepts enjoined in the
Gospels, no doubt can be entertained
that very many of these are to be
literally observed, as e.g., when our
Lord says, 'But I say unto you, Swear
not at all;' and when He says,
'Whosoever looketh upon a woman to lust
after her, hath committed adultery with
her already in his heart;' the
admonitions also which are found in the
writings of the Apostle Paul, 'Warn them
that are unruly, comfort the
feeble-minded, support the weak, be
patient towards all men,' and very many
others. And yet I have no doubt that an
attentive reader will, in numerous
instances, hesitate whether this or that
history can be considered to be
literally true or not; or whether this
or that precept ought to be observed
according to the letter or not. And
therefore great pains and labor are to
be employed, until every reader
reverentially understand that he is
dealing with divine and not human words
inserted in the sacred books”.
What
we must not loose sight of is that the
bible is a spiritual book that does not
deal with man's history -- but rather,
man's relationship to the Kingdom of
God. Yes, it is true that the Son of
Man walked the earth at the beginning of
our Common Era -- that he came to save
those who were lost -- this is an
historical fact that with my own eyes I
have been permitted to witness. But we
must remain ever mindful that the Son of
God is calling us into his Kingdom this
very day, and those who will hear him
calling and enter therein will be
saved. Therefore, even when the
scriptures are historically accurate,
their accuracy means very little unless
you can understand what is being
conveyed in the context of your quest to
enter the Kingdom during our present
time.
It is
not until we understand that the Living
Christ is present within us, and that we
must become the Son of Man who walks in
The Way, that we can begin to embrace
the written word in its soul and
spiritual essence. All the names,
numbers and seemingly events that are
reported in the New Testament, convey a
sacred meaning to the disciple of the
Lord who is in search of the Truth and
Light. All those who walk in The Way
must be born of a virgin -- be baptized
in the river Jordan -- raise us twelve
disciples -- preach the Living Word to
the Nations (the elemental forces of the
body/mind -- convert the Jew (Judas) who
practices the Word of God outwardly,
instead of inwardly -- carries their
cross to the crucifixion in the endeavor
to overcome the body/mind of flesh and
return as the prodigal son to the
Kingdom of Origination where our
Heavenly Father awaits us.
The
carnally minded believer who simply
skims over the body of the scriptures
and sees historical events -- rather
than intimate spiritual truths --
believes horrific absurdities about God
that are not worthy to even entertain,
as well as beliefs that are often
contradicted in other places within the
scriptures. Anyone who believes that
the Bible is literally true where it is
written: “And the LORD our God
delivered him over to us; so we defeated
him, his sons, and all his people. We
took all his cities at that time, and we
utterly destroyed the men, women, and
little ones of every city; we left none
remaining” (Deut 2:33-34 NKJ);
is simply unable to perceive the Divine
Essence of God.
How
can we believe that God would look
favorably upon the senseless destruction
of innocent men, women, and children?
How can we believe that God would
Himself orchestrate such a heinous act
of irrational and pointless violence?
Only those people who are themselves of
a gross, barbaric, and unrefined nature,
would even entertain the belief that a
Supreme Being would orchestrate and
affirm such horrendous behavior.
Often
those places in scripture that contain
the greatest absurdities, are the very
places where important truths are placed
for man to discern and behold. Thus,
an example of this fact is seen in the
Ten Commandments where it is written:
“You shall not bow down to them or
worship them; for I, the LORD your God,
am a jealous God, punishing the children
for the sin of the fathers to the third
and fourth generation of those who hate
me” (Deut 5:9 NIV). Is this
the loving God revealed by Jesus who
holds the children of unbelievers
accountable to the third and fourth
generation?
From
a spiritual perspective, what we have
here is the embodiment of a very
important and profound spiritual concept
-- a concept conveying a truth of such
magnitude, that if we understood its
spiritual meaning, we would begin to
comprehend the reason why carnal man
cannot gaze into the heavenly realms
with his physical eyes. Going one step
further, if we knew what is being
conveyed in this statement, and we could
perceive the workings of the natural
laws of this realm and their impact upon
our minds and thinking, we would
immediately understand why we are
limited to less then ten percent of our
potential of mind. Yet, instead of
seeking out the spiritual significance
of this absurdity, Christians believe
that God punishes the children of
sinners to the third and fourth
generation.
That
the literal meaning of the written word
is not worthy of our belief is even
demonstrated in the Bible's own
refutation of such a doctrine that the
children of sinners will be held
accountable to the third and fourth
generation:
“The soul that
sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not
bear the iniquity of the father, neither
shall the father bear the iniquity of
the son: the righteousness of the
righteous shall be upon him, and the
wickedness of the wicked shall be upon
him” (Ezek 18:20 KJV).
The
reader who pays close attention to the
scriptures will immediately question why
God would hold innocent children
accountable for the sins of their
forefathers to the third and fourth
generation? Is this the righteousness
of God? Or, are we supposed to seek
the inner meaning of the scriptures, and
learn what great spiritual truth the
Bible is attempting to convey to us with
regard to the third and fourth
sequential generation?
The Shepherd Of
Hermas: In
view of the fact that such an absurdity
was written so that men of a reasonable
mind could not believe such statement
literally, we would do well to learn
from the first Christians, and
investigate their mindset regarding the
nature of scripture? In the
introduction of the early Christian
writing known as the Shepard of Hermas
it is written:
“The Pastor of
Hermas was one of the most popular
books, if not the most popular book, in
the Christian Church during the second,
third, and fourth centuries... In
ancient times two opinions prevailed in
regard to the authorship. The most
widely spread was, that the Pastor of
Hermas was the production of the Hermas
mentioned in the Epistle to the Romans.
Origen states this opinion distinctly,
and it is repeated by Eusebius and
Jerome”.
If it
is true that the Pastor of Hermas was
one of the most important scriptural
authorities over the first four
centuries, then we can use it in our
endeavor to better understand the
essence of early Christian thought.
What the Shepherd of Hermas has to say
is very important to us today because it
represents the scriptural tradition that
was taught directly to the faithful
flock by the Apostles of Christ. Thus,
on the nature of scripture, in the
Shepherd we find:
“I am senseless,
sir, say I, and do not understand these
parables. For how she can crush out, and
on the other hand save, I do not
perceive. Listen, says he. Those who
have never searched for the truth, nor
investigated the nature of the Divinity,
but have simply believed, when they
devote themselves to and become mixed up
with business, and wealth, and heathen
friendships, and many other actions of
this world, do not perceive the parables
of Divinity; for their minds are
darkened by these actions, and they are
corrupted and become dried up. Even as
beautiful vines, when they are
neglected, are withered up by thorns and
divers plants, so men who have believed,
and have afterwards fallen away into
many of those actions above mentioned,
go astray in their minds, and lose all
understanding in regard to
righteousness; for if they hear of
righteousness, their minds are occupied
with their business, and they give no
heed at all. Those, on the other hand,
who have the fear of God, and search
after the Godhead and truth, and have
their hearts turned to the Lord, quickly
perceive and understand what is said to
them, because they have the fear of the
Lord in them. For where the Lord dwells,
there is much understanding. Cleave,
then, to the Lord, and you will
understand and perceive all things”.
The
message that is very clear from this
early Christian writing is that it is
impossible to mature spiritually, while
attempting to divide oneself between the
two worlds. In our present day culture
we are living proof as to the validity
of the wisdom that is portrayed in this
writing -- i.e., one cannot perceive the
true meaning of the parables and the
inner significance of the historical
narrative of the scriptures, while one
devotes their lives to their
“business, and wealth, and heathen
friendships, and many other actions of
this world” -- which would
include an addiction to television,
computer games, internet pornography,
and all the many leisure’s and
entertainments that captivate and
control our every-day lives. Moreover,
how can we even be called believers when
we send our children to educational
systems that not only teach a Darwinist
perception of life that is fatally
flawed, but further teaches our children
to become totally immersed in the
sensual and materialistic powers of this
world? Fundamentally, what this
universally accepted first century
writing conveys to us is that, contrary
to what is being preached in our
pulpits, the Sunday go to church people
who live culturized lives over the
course of the rest of the week, are
incapable of fulfilling the requirements
of the Word of God.
In
the Shepherd of Hermas a reference is
made to a tower, of which it is written:
“And the tower, I asked, what does
it mean? This tower, he replied, is the
Church. And these virgins, who are they?
They are Holy Spirits, and men cannot
otherwise be found in the kingdom of God
unless these have put their clothing
upon them: for if you receive the name
only, and do not receive from them the
clothing, they are of no advantage to
you. For these virgins are the powers of
the Son of God. If you bear His name but
possess not His power, it will be in
vain that you bear His name”.
In
understanding what is written, it is
most important for us to be aware of the
continual message found in the words:
“If you bear His name but possess not
His power, it will be in vain that you
bear His name”. Thus, if you
call yourselves Christian, but fail to
purify and develop your mind and body
from the defilements of this world --
and do not possess the true Knowledge of
the Spiritual Christ -- and have not
yourselves inherited the same higher
powers of mind that the Son of God
promised all his followers would possess
-- then
“it will be in vain that
you bear His name”.
Everything throughout the scriptures,
including the New Testament, has three
meanings, as proclaimed in the Proverbs:
“And do thou describe these things
to thyself in a threefold manner, in
counsel and knowledge, and that thou
mayest answer the words of truth to
those who have proposed them to thee”.
In explaining this great truth, Origen
writes of the miracles of Jesus:
“…so also there were many dead in the
days of Jesus, but those only rose from
the grave whom the Logos knew to be
fitted for a resurrection, in order that
the works done by the Lord might not be
merely symbols of certain things, but
that by the very acts themselves He
might gain over many to the marvelous
doctrine of the Gospel. I would say,
moreover, that, agreeably to the promise
of Jesus, His disciples performed even
greater works than these miracles of
Jesus, which were perceptible only to
the senses. For the eyes of those who
are blind in soul are ever opened; and
the ears of those who were deaf to
virtuous words, listen readily to the
doctrine of God, and of the blessed life
with Him; and many, too, who were lame
in the feet of the 'inner man,' as
Scripture calls it, having now been
healed by the word, do not simply leap,
but leap as the hart, which is an animal
hostile to serpents, and stronger than
all the poison of vipers. And these lame
who have been healed, receive from Jesus
power to trample, with those feet in
which they were formerly lame, upon the
serpents and scorpions of wickedness,
and generally upon all the power of the
enemy; and though they tread upon it,
they sustain no injury, for they also
have become stronger than the poison of
all evil and of demons” (Symbols
of miracles; Origen, Contra Celsum).
What
these words demonstrate to us is the
great truth that both life, and the
scriptures, is a great deal more than
what we perceive it to be. The secret
to understanding the Bible, which is the
key to the knowledge of life itself, was
possessed by the early church, and can
still be embraced in the words of Origen
when he responded to Celsus that the
Christ still visits the Godly, as seen
in the words:
“I maintain that
even after His incarnation, He is always
found by those who possess the acutest
spiritual vision to be most God-like”.
Thus, the secret, then, is not in what
one believes -- for all philosophical
belief is at best a mere shadow of
reality -- but rather, all the great
Truths of Creation belong to those who
are willing to live their life in
accordance with the teachings of The
Way, in order to make themselves a fit
vessel for the Son of God to come and
make his abode within them, and
personally reveal the Mysteries of God
and the Sacred Secrets of Creation.
|
|
|
|